| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenCA PKI 0.9.2.5, and possibly earlier versions, allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as authorized users via a link or IMG tag to RAServer. |
| The web interface on the Axesstel MV 410R redirects users back to the referring page after execution of some CGI scripts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to avoid detection of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, as demonstrated by a redirect from the cgi-bin/wireless.cgi script. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Drupal 5.x before 5.10 and 6.x before 6.4 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add or (2) delete user access rules. |
| WordPress 2.6.3 relies on the REQUEST superglobal array in certain dangerous situations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct delayed and persistent cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via crafted cookies, as demonstrated by attacks that (1) delete user accounts or (2) cause a denial of service (loss of application access). NOTE: this issue relies on the presence of an independent vulnerability that allows cookie injection. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the wpcr_do_options_page function in WP Comment Remix plugin before 1.4.4 for WordPress allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as administrators via a request that sets the wpcr_hidden_form_input parameter. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Joomla! before 1.5 RC4 allow remote attackers to (1) add a Super Admin, (2) upload an extension containing arbitrary PHP code, and (3) modify the configuration as administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| The Events Manager – Calendar, Bookings, Tickets, and more! plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.4.7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify booking statuses via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| eladmin v2.7 and before is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the DatabaseController.java component. |
| The Smart Forms WordPress plugin before 2.6.87 does not have authorisation in various AJAX actions, which could allow users with a role as low as subscriber to call them and perform unauthorised actions such as deleting entries. The plugin also lacks CSRF checks in some places which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as deleting entries. |
| The Smart Forms WordPress plugin before 2.6.94 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged-in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks, such as editing entries, and we consider it a medium risk. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wprio Table Block by RioVizual allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Table Block by RioVizual: from n/a through 2.1.7. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Quý Lê 91 Administrator Z allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Administrator Z: from n/a through 2025.03.04. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saiful Islam UltraAddons Elementor Lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects UltraAddons Elementor Lite: from n/a through 2.0.0. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BeRocket Sequential Order Numbers for WooCommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Sequential Order Numbers for WooCommerce: from n/a through 3.6.2. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kuppuraj Advanced All in One Admin Search by WP Spotlight allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Advanced All in One Admin Search by WP Spotlight: from n/a through 1.1.1. |
| The WPFront User Role Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the whitelist_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the default role option that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This is only exploitable on multisite instances. |
| Rumpus - FTP server version 9.0.7.1 Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) – vulnerability may allow unauthorized action on behalf of authenticated users. |
| Rumpus - FTP server Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) – Privilege escalation vulnerability that may allow privilege escalation. |
| Leantime 3.0.6 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). This vulnerability allows malicious actors to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users, specifically administrators. |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Form Tools 3.1.1 allows attackers to manipulate sensitive user data via crafted link. |
