| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Information disclosure due to buffer overread in Core |
| Information disclosure due to buffer overread in Core |
| Transient DOS due to buffer over-read in WLAN while processing 802.11 management frames. |
| Transient DOS due to buffer over-read in WLAN while parsing WLAN CSA action frames. |
| Information disclosure due to buffer over-read in WLAN while parsing BTM action frame. |
| Information disclosure due to buffer over-read in WLAN while WLAN frame parsing due to missing frame length check. |
| Information disclosure due to buffer over-read in Bluetooth HOST while processing GetFolderItems and GetItemAttribute Cmds from peer device. |
| Insufficient input validation in SEV firmware may allow an attacker to perform out-of-bounds memory reads within the ASP boot loader, potentially leading to a denial of service.
|
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Customer Interaction History product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Outcome-Result). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Customer Interaction History. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Customer Interaction History, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Customer Interaction History accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Customer Interaction History accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| A buffer over-read vulnerability was reported in the ThinkPadX13s BIOS PersistenceConfigDxe driver that could allow a local attacker with elevated privileges to cause information disclosure. |
| Microsoft PostScript Printer Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft ODBC Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Windows iSCSI Discovery Service Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| An Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an adjacent, unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) to device due to out of resources. When a device is configured with "service-provider/SP style" switching, and mac-limiting is configured on an Aggregated Ethernet (ae) interface, and then a PFE is restarted or the device is rebooted, mac-limiting doesn't work anymore. Please note that the issue might not be apparent as traffic will continue to flow through the device although the mac table and respective logs will indicate that mac limit is reached. Functionality can be restored by removing and re-adding the MAC limit configuration. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX5k Series, EX46xx Series: All versions prior to 20.2R3-S5; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S5; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S4; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S1; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3 on; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3 on; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R2 on. |
| LibTIFF 4.4.0 has an out-of-bounds read in tiffcp in tools/tiffcp.c:948, allowing attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from sources, the fix is available with commit e8131125. |
| Not exploitable |
| Foxit PDF Reader and PDF Editor 11.2.1.53537 and earlier has an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. |
| A malicious / defective bluetooth controller can cause buffer overreads in the most functions that process HCI command responses. |
| TOTOLINK CPE CP450 v4.1.0cu.747_B20191224 was discovered to contain a stack buffer overflow vulnerability in the setIpQosRules function. |
| In tmu_tz_control of tmu.c, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |