Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openshift
Subscriptions
Total
931 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-10213 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-08-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| OpenShift Container Platform, versions 4.1 and 4.2, does not sanitize secret data written to pod logs when the log level in a given operator is set to Debug or higher. A low privileged user could read pod logs to discover secret material if the log level has already been modified in an operator by a privileged user. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10215 | 2 Bootstrap-3-typeahead Project, Redhat | 2 Bootstrap-3-typeahead, Openshift | 2024-08-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| Bootstrap-3-Typeahead after version 4.0.2 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting flaw in the highlighter() function. An attacker could exploit this via user interaction to execute code in the user's browser. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10165 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-08-04 | 2.3 Low |
| OpenShift Container Platform before version 4.1.3 writes OAuth tokens in plaintext to the audit logs for the Kubernetes API server and OpenShift API server. A user with sufficient privileges could recover OAuth tokens from these audit logs and use them to access other resources. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10150 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-08-04 | N/A |
| It was found that OpenShift Container Platform versions 3.6.x - 4.6.0 does not perform SSH Host Key checking when using ssh key authentication during builds. An attacker, with the ability to redirect network traffic, could use this to alter the resulting build output. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10176 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-08-04 | N/A |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift Container Platform, versions 3.11 and later, in which the CSRF tokens used in the cluster console component were found to remain static during a user's session. An attacker with the ability to observe the value of this token would be able to re-use the token to perform a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 44 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 41 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9515 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 36 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 33 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9512 | 6 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 3 more | 24 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 21 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-7609 | 2 Elastic, Redhat | 3 Kibana, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-08-04 | 10.0 Critical |
| Kibana versions before 5.6.15 and 6.6.1 contain an arbitrary code execution flaw in the Timelion visualizer. An attacker with access to the Timelion application could send a request that will attempt to execute javascript code. This could possibly lead to an attacker executing arbitrary commands with permissions of the Kibana process on the host system. | ||||
| CVE-2019-7610 | 2 Elastic, Redhat | 2 Kibana, Openshift | 2024-08-04 | N/A |
| Kibana versions before 6.6.1 contain an arbitrary code execution flaw in the security audit logger. If a Kibana instance has the setting xpack.security.audit.enabled set to true, an attacker could send a request that will attempt to execute javascript code. This could possibly lead to an attacker executing arbitrary commands with permissions of the Kibana process on the host system. | ||||
| CVE-2019-7608 | 2 Elastic, Redhat | 2 Kibana, Openshift | 2024-08-04 | N/A |
| Kibana versions before 5.6.15 and 6.6.1 had a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information from or perform destructive actions on behalf of other Kibana users. | ||||
| CVE-2019-6648 | 2 F5, Redhat | 2 Container Ingress Service, Openshift | 2024-08-04 | 4.4 Medium |
| On version 1.9.0, If DEBUG logging is enable, F5 Container Ingress Service (CIS) for Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift (k8s-bigip-ctlr) log files may contain BIG-IP secrets such as SSL Private Keys and Private key Passphrases as provided as inputs by an AS3 Declaration. | ||||
| CVE-2019-5736 | 13 Apache, Canonical, D2iq and 10 more | 20 Mesos, Ubuntu Linux, Dc\/os and 17 more | 2024-08-04 | 8.6 High |
| runc through 1.0-rc6, as used in Docker before 18.09.2 and other products, allows attackers to overwrite the host runc binary (and consequently obtain host root access) by leveraging the ability to execute a command as root within one of these types of containers: (1) a new container with an attacker-controlled image, or (2) an existing container, to which the attacker previously had write access, that can be attached with docker exec. This occurs because of file-descriptor mishandling, related to /proc/self/exe. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3889 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-08-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| A reflected XSS vulnerability exists in authorization flow of OpenShift Container Platform versions: openshift-online-3, openshift-enterprise-3.4 through 3.7 and openshift-enterprise-3.9 through 3.11. An attacker could use this flaw to steal authorization data by getting them to click on a malicious link. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3876 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-08-04 | 6.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the /oauth/token/request custom endpoint of the OpenShift OAuth server allowing for XSS generation of CLI tokens due to missing X-Frame-Options and CSRF protections. If not otherwise prevented, a separate XSS vulnerability via JavaScript could further allow for the extraction of these tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3884 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2024-08-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability exists in the garbage collection mechanism of atomic-openshift. An attacker able spoof the UUID of a valid object from another namespace is able to delete children of those objects. Versions 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11 and 4.1 are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3826 | 2 Prometheus, Redhat | 3 Prometheus, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-08-04 | N/A |
| A stored, DOM based, cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw was found in Prometheus before version 2.7.1. An attacker could exploit this by convincing an authenticated user to visit a crafted URL on a Prometheus server, allowing for the execution and persistent storage of arbitrary scripts. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3818 | 2 Kube-rbac-proxy Project, Redhat | 3 Kube-rbac-proxy, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| The kube-rbac-proxy container before version 0.4.1 as used in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform does not honor TLS configurations, allowing for use of insecure ciphers and TLS 1.0. An attacker could target traffic sent over a TLS connection with a weak configuration and potentially break the encryption. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0542 | 2 Redhat, Xtermjs | 3 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform, Xterm.js | 2024-08-04 | 8.8 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Xterm.js when the component mishandles special characters, aka "Xterm Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects xterm.js. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36182 | 5 Debian, Fasterxml, Netapp and 2 more | 47 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Cloud Backup and 44 more | 2024-08-04 | 8.1 High |
| FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS. | ||||