| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Five routine detail action endpoints check a cache before calling `self.get_object()`. In versions up to and including 2.4, ache keys are scoped only by `pk` — no user ID is included. When a victim has previously accessed their routine via the API, an attacker can retrieve the cached response for the same PK without any ownership check. Commit e964328784e2ee2830a1991d69fadbce86ac9fbf contains a patch for the issue. |
| wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. In versions up to and including 2.4, three `nutritional_values` action endpoints fetch objects via `Model.objects.get(pk=pk)` — a raw ORM call that bypasses the user-scoped queryset. Any authenticated user can read another user's private nutrition plan data, including caloric intake and full macro breakdown, by supplying an arbitrary PK. Commit 29876a1954fe959e4b58ef070170e81703dab60e contains a fix for the issue. |
| The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on
the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may
allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing
or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force
attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely
associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the
same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable
session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where
the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and
receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability
may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a
malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming
the backend with valid session requests. |
| Charging station authentication identifiers are publicly accessible via web-based mapping platforms. |
| WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling
attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate
data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the
OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station
identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger.
Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege
escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and
corruption of charging network data reported to the backend. |
| The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on
the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may
allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing
or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force
attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on
the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may
allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing
or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force
attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely
associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the
same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable
session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where
the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and
receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability
may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a
malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming
the backend with valid session requests. |
| Charging station authentication identifiers are publicly accessible via web-based mapping platforms. |
| WebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling
attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate
data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the
OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station
identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger.
Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege
escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and
corruption of charging network data reported to the backend. |
| The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on
the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may
allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing
or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force
attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely
associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the
same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable
session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where
the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and
receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability
may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a
malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming
the backend with valid session requests. |
| An OS command injection
vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an
authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by
injecting malicious input into the devices field of the firmware update
update action to achieve remote code execution. |
| An OS command injection
vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an
authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by
injecting malicious input into the devices field of the firmware update
apply action. |
| An OS command injection
vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an
authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by
injecting malicious input into the devices field when accessing the get
setup route, leading to remote code execution. |
| An OS command injection
vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an
authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by
injecting malicious input into the map filename field during the map
upload action of the parameters route. |
| A vulnerability has been found in bolo-solo up to 2.6.4. This impacts the function importMarkdownsSync of the file src/main/java/org/b3log/solo/bolo/prop/BackupService.java of the component SnakeYAML. Such manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| A vulnerability in Brocade SANnav before 2.4.0b prints the
Password-Based Encryption (PBE) key in plaintext in the system audit log
file. The vulnerability could allow a remote authenticated attacker
with access to the audit logs to access the pbe key.
Note: The vulnerability is only triggered during a migration and not
in a new installation. The system audit logs are accessible only to a
privileged user on the server.
These audit logs are the local server VM’s audit logs and are not
controlled by SANnav. These logs are only visible to the server admin of
the host server and are not visible to the SANnav admin or any SANnav
user. |
| Brocade SANnav before Brocade SANnav 2.4.0b logs database passwords in clear text in the standby SANnav server, after disaster recovery failover. The vulnerability could allow a remote authenticated attacker with admin privilege able to access the SANnav logs or the supportsave to read the database password. |
