Total
524 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-10356 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 33 Debian Linux, Active Iq Unified Manager, Cloud Backup and 30 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.2 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Security). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u161, 7u151, 8u144 and 9; Java SE Embedded: 8u144; JRockit: R28.3.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit executes to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit accessible data. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 6.2 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2016-9243 | 3 Canonical, Cryptography.io, Fedoraproject | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Cryptography, Fedora | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| HKDF in cryptography before 1.5.2 returns an empty byte-string if used with a length less than algorithm.digest_size. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8370 | 1 Mitsubishielectric | 6 Qj71e71-100, Qj71e71-100 Firmware, Qj71e71-b2 and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Mitsubishi Electric Automation MELSEC-Q series Ethernet interface modules QJ71E71-100, all versions, QJ71E71-B5, all versions, and QJ71E71-B2, all versions. Weakly encrypted passwords are transmitted to a MELSEC-Q PLC. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6602 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Webnms Framework | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| ZOHO WebNMS Framework 5.2 and 5.2 SP1 use a weak obfuscation algorithm to store passwords, which allows context-dependent attackers to obtain cleartext passwords by leveraging access to WEB-INF/conf/securitydbData.xml. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-6601 for a remote exploit. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6485 | 1 Magento | 1 Magento2 | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The __construct function in Framework/Encryption/Crypt.php in Magento 2 uses the PHP rand function to generate a random number for the initialization vector, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by guessing the value. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6340 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Quickstart Cloud Installer | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The kickstart file in Red Hat QuickStart Cloud Installer (QCI) forces use of MD5 passwords on deployed systems, which makes it easier for attackers to determine cleartext passwords via a brute-force attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5542 | 2 Oracle, Redhat | 6 Jdk, Jre, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u121, 7u111, 8u102; and Java SE Embedded 8u101 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via vectors related to Libraries. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5431 | 1 Php Jose Project | 1 Php Jose | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The PHP JOSE Library by Gree Inc. before version 2.2.1 is vulnerable to key confusion/algorithm substitution in the JWS component resulting in bypassing the signature verification via crafted tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3702 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms Management Engine | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Padding oracle flaw in CloudForms Management Engine (aka CFME) 5 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3099 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Hpc Node and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| mod_ns in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation 7 allows remote attackers to force the use of ciphers that were not intended to be enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2217 | 1 Dest-unreach | 1 Socat | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The OpenSSL address implementation in Socat 1.7.3.0 and 2.0.0-b8 does not use a prime number for the DH, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain the shared secret. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2183 | 6 Cisco, Nodejs, Openssl and 3 more | 14 Content Security Management Appliance, Node.js, Openssl and 11 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0923 | 1 Dell | 1 Bsafe | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The client in EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.9 and 4.1.x before 4.1.5 places the weakest algorithms first in a signature-algorithm list transmitted to a server, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging server behavior in which the first algorithm is used. | ||||
| CVE-2015-9235 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Jsonwebtoken | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In jsonwebtoken node module before 4.2.2 it is possible for an attacker to bypass verification when a token digitally signed with an asymmetric key (RS/ES family) of algorithms but instead the attacker send a token digitally signed with a symmetric algorithm (HS* family). | ||||
| CVE-2015-8234 | 1 Openstack | 1 Glance | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The image signature algorithm in OpenStack Glance 11.0.0 allows remote attackers to bypass the signature verification process via a crafted image, which triggers an MD5 collision. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4000 | 13 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 10 more | 31 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Safari and 28 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3230 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 2 389 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| 389 Directory Server (formerly Fedora Directory Server) before 1.3.3.12 does not enforce the nsSSL3Ciphers preference when creating an sslSocket, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact by requesting to use a disabled cipher. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2808 | 9 Canonical, Debian, Fujitsu and 6 more | 102 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Sparc Enterprise M3000 and 99 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0535 | 1 Dell | 2 Bsafe, Bsafe Ssl-c | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3 and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier do not properly restrict TLS state transitions, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks to EXPORT_RSA ciphers via crafted TLS traffic, related to the "FREAK" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2015-0204. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0533 | 1 Dell | 2 Bsafe, Bsafe Ssl-c | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3 and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier allow remote SSL servers to conduct ECDHE-to-ECDH downgrade attacks and trigger a loss of forward secrecy by omitting the ServerKeyExchange message, a similar issue to CVE-2014-3572. | ||||