Search
Search Results (26075 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-11737 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists that could lead to a denial of service and a loss of confidentiality, integrity of the controller when an unauthenticated crafted Modbus packet is sent to the device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31995 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Maxai Workbench | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low |
| HCL Unica MaxAI Workbench is vulnerable to improper input validation. This allows attackers to exploit vulnerabilities such as SQL Injection, XSS, or command injection, leading to unauthorized access or data breaches, etc. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43319 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in bPlugins LLC Flash & HTML5 Video.This issue affects Flash & HTML5 Video: from n/a through 2.5.31. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12741 | 1 Google | 1 Cloud Looker | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Looker user with Developer role could create a database connection using Denodo driver and, by manipulating LookML, cause Looker to execute a malicious command. Looker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable. This issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances. No user action is required for these. Self-hosted instances must be upgraded as soon as possible. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted. The versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page https://download.looker.com/ : * 24.12.108+ * 24.18.200+ * 25.0.78+ * 25.6.65+ * 25.8.47+ * 25.12.10+ * 25.14+ | ||||
| CVE-2024-8969 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| OMFLOW from The SYSCOM Group has a vulnerability involving the exposure of sensitive data. This allows remote attackers who have logged into the system to obtain password hashes of all users and administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27244 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| AssetView and AssetView CLOUD contain an issue with acquiring sensitive information from sent data to the developer. If exploited, sensitive information may be obtained by a remote unauthenticated attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34021 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR camera models, including iZero, Targa 512, Targa 504, Targa Semplice, Targa 704 TKM, Targa 805, Targa 710 INOX, Targa 750, and Targa 704 ILB. The application fails to validate user-supplied input in JSON POST parameters such as ipnotify_address and url, which are used by internal mechanisms to perform image fetch and DNS lookups. This allows remote unauthenticated attackers to induce the system to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external systems, potentially bypassing firewall policies or conducting internal service enumeration. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-01-25 UTC. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38798 | 1 Tianocore | 1 Edk2 | 2026-04-15 | 5.2 Medium |
| EDK2 contains a vulnerability in BIOS where an attacker may cause “Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor” by local access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will lead to possible information disclosure or escalation of privilege and impact Confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26318 | 2026-04-15 | 5.8 Medium | ||
| hb.exe in TSplus Remote Access before 17.30 2024-10-30 allows remote attackers to retrieve a list of all domain accounts currently connected to the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38760 | 1 Sumanbhattarai | 1 Send Users Email | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in David Maucher Send Users Email allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Send Users Email: from n/a through 1.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14156 | 2 Ays-pro, Wordpress | 2 Fox Lms, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Fox LMS – WordPress LMS Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5.1. This is due to the plugin not properly validating the 'role' parameter when creating new users via the `/fox-lms/v1/payments/create-order` REST API endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new user accounts with arbitrary roles, including administrator, leading to complete site compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58442 | 1 Saleor | 1 Saleor | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.21.0 and prior to version 3.21.16, requesting certain fields in the response of `accountRegister` may result in errors that could unintentionally reveal whether a user with the provided email already exists in Saleor. Version 3.21.16 fixes the issue. As a workaround, rate-limit the mutation to reduce the impact. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13596 | 1 Atisoluciones | 1 Ciges | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A sensitive information disclosure vulnerability exists in the error handling component of ATISoluciones CIGES Application version 2.15.6 and earlier. When certain unexpected conditions trigger unhandled exceptions, the application returns detailed error messages and stack traces to the client. This may expose internal filesystem paths, SQL queries, database connection details, or environment configuration data to remote unauthenticated attackers. This issue allows information gathering and reconnaissance but does not enable direct system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53243 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Enterprise, Splunk Secure Gateway | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.2, 9.2.4, and 9.1.7 and versions below 3.2.462, 3.7.18, and 3.8.5 of the Splunk Secure Gateway app on Splunk Cloud Platform, a low-privileged user that does not hold the “admin“ or “power“ Splunk roles could see alert search query responses using Splunk Secure Gateway App Key Value Store (KVstore) collections endpoints due to improper access control. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52237 | 1 Siemens | 80 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I800nc, Ruggedcom I801 and 77 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i800NC, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i801NC, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i802NC, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM i803NC, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100NC, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200NC, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC30NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RP110NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600FNC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS1600TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400NC, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS401NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNC, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000ANC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000HNC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000NC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS8000TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS910NC, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RS969NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. The web server of the affected devices allow a low privileged user to access hashes and password salts of all system's users, including admin users. An attacker could use the obtained information to brute force the passwords offline. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52238 | 1 Siemens | 2 Ruggedcom Rst2228, Ruggedcom Rst2228p | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.9.0). The web server of the affected systems leaks the MACSEC key in clear text to a logged in user. An attacker with the credentials of a low privileged user could retrieve the MACSEC key and access (decrypt) the ethernet frames sent by authorized recipients. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37093 | 1 Netis-systems | 1 Netis E1+ | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Netis E1+ 1.2.32533 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve WiFi passwords through the netcore_get.cgi endpoint. Attackers can send a GET request to the endpoint to extract sensitive network credentials including SSID and WiFi passwords in plain text. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58059 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Valtimo is a platform for Business Process Automation. In versions before 12.16.0.RELEASE, and from 13.0.0.RELEASE to before 13.1.2.RELEASE, any admin that can create or modify and execute process-definitions could gain access to sensitive data or resources. This includes but is not limited to: running executables on the application host, inspecting and extracting data from the host environment or application properties, spring beans (application context, database pooling). The following conditions have to be met in order to perform this attack: the user must be logged in, have the admin role, and must have some knowledge about running scripts via a the Camunda/Operator engine. Version 12.16.0 and 13.1.2 have been patched. It is strongly advised to upgrade. If no scripting is needed in any of the processes, it could be possible to disable it altogether via the ProcessEngineConfiguration. However, this workaround could lead to unexpected side-effects. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12984 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Amcrest IP2M-841B, IP2M-841W, IPC-IP2M-841B, IPC-IP3M-943B, IPC-IP3M-943S, IPC-IP3M-HX2B and IPC-IPM-721S up to 20241211. This affects an unknown part of the file /web_caps/webCapsConfig of the component Web Interface. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6861 | 1 Redhat | 4 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Satellite Maintenance and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A disclosure of sensitive information flaw was found in foreman via the GraphQL API. If the introspection feature is enabled, it is possible for attackers to retrieve sensitive admin authentication keys which could result in a compromise of the entire product's API. | ||||