Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Camel Spring Boot
Subscriptions
Total
75 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-38750 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Snakeyaml Project | 9 Debian Linux, Amq Broker, Camel Spring Boot and 6 more | 2024-08-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Using snakeYAML to parse untrusted YAML files may be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks (DOS). If the parser is running on user supplied input, an attacker may supply content that causes the parser to crash by stackoverflow. | ||||
| CVE-2022-38648 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 4 Batik, Debian Linux, Camel Spring Boot and 1 more | 2024-08-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to fetch external resources. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. | ||||
| CVE-2022-38398 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 4 Batik, Debian Linux, Camel Spring Boot and 1 more | 2024-08-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. | ||||
| CVE-2022-37866 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Ivy, Camel Spring Boot | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| When Apache Ivy downloads artifacts from a repository it stores them in the local file system based on a user-supplied "pattern" that may include placeholders for artifacts coordinates like the organisation, module or version. If said coordinates contain "../" sequences - which are valid characters for Ivy coordinates in general - it is possible the artifacts are stored outside of Ivy's local cache or repository or can overwrite different artifacts inside of the local cache. In order to exploit this vulnerability an attacker needs collaboration by the remote repository as Ivy will issue http requests containing ".." sequences and a "normal" repository will not interpret them as part of the artifact coordinates. Users of Apache Ivy 2.0.0 to 2.5.1 should upgrade to Ivy 2.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2022-37865 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Ivy, Camel Spring Boot | 2024-08-03 | 9.1 Critical |
| With Apache Ivy 2.4.0 an optional packaging attribute has been introduced that allows artifacts to be unpacked on the fly if they used pack200 or zip packaging. For artifacts using the "zip", "jar" or "war" packaging Ivy prior to 2.5.1 doesn't verify the target path when extracting the archive. An archive containing absolute paths or paths that try to traverse "upwards" using ".." sequences can then write files to any location on the local fie system that the user executing Ivy has write access to. Ivy users of version 2.4.0 to 2.5.0 should upgrade to Ivy 2.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33681 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Pulsar, Camel Spring Boot | 2024-08-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| Delayed TLS hostname verification in the Pulsar Java Client and the Pulsar Proxy make each client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. Connections from the Pulsar Java Client to the Pulsar Broker/Proxy and connections from the Pulsar Proxy to the Pulsar Broker are vulnerable. Authentication data is sent before verifying the server’s TLS certificate matches the hostname, which means authentication data could be exposed to an attacker. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack by providing the client with a cryptographically valid certificate for an unrelated host. Because the client sends authentication data before performing hostname verification, an attacker could gain access to the client’s authentication data. The client eventually closes the connection when it verifies the hostname and identifies the targeted hostname does not match a hostname on the certificate. Because the client eventually closes the connection, the value of the intercepted authentication data depends on the authentication method used by the client. Token based authentication and username/password authentication methods are vulnerable because the authentication data can be used to impersonate the client in a separate session. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Java Client versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31777 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Spark, Camel Spring Boot | 2024-08-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Spark 3.2.1 and earlier, and 3.3.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the web browser of a user, by including a malicious payload into the logs which would be returned in logs rendered in the UI. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31684 | 2 Pivotal, Redhat | 3 Reactor Netty, Camel Spring Boot, Openshift Application Runtimes | 2024-08-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| Reactor Netty HTTP Server, in versions 1.0.11 - 1.0.23, may log request headers in some cases of invalid HTTP requests. The logged headers may reveal valid access tokens to those with access to server logs. This may affect only invalid HTTP requests where logging at WARN level is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4492 | 1 Redhat | 16 Build Of Quarkus, Camel Spring Boot, Integration Camel For Spring Boot and 13 more | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4245 | 2 Codehaus-plexus Project, Redhat | 23 Codehaus-plexus, A Mq Clients, Amq Broker and 20 more | 2024-08-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in codehaus-plexus. The org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.XmlWriterUtil#writeComment fails to sanitize comments for a --> sequence. This issue means that text contained in the command string could be interpreted as XML and allow for XML injection. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4244 | 2 Codehaus-plexus Project, Redhat | 23 Codehaus-plexus, A Mq Clients, Amq Broker and 20 more | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in codeplex-codehaus. A directory traversal attack (also known as path traversal) aims to access files and directories stored outside the intended folder. By manipulating files with "dot-dot-slash (../)" sequences and their variations or by using absolute file paths, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on the file system, including application source code, configuration, and other critical system files. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1415 | 1 Redhat | 16 Camel Quarkus, Camel Spring Boot, Decision Manager and 13 more | 2024-08-03 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found where some utility classes in Drools core did not use proper safeguards when deserializing data. This flaw allows an authenticated attacker to construct malicious serialized objects (usually called gadgets) and achieve code execution on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51074 | 2 Json-path, Redhat | 5 Jayway Jsonpath, Amq Streams, Apache-camel-spring-boot and 2 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| json-path v2.8.0 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the Criteria.parse() method. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40167 | 3 Debian, Eclipse, Redhat | 11 Debian Linux, Jetty, Amq Broker and 8 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Jetty is a Java based web server and servlet engine. Prior to versions 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16, and 12.0.1, Jetty accepts the `+` character proceeding the content-length value in a HTTP/1 header field. This is more permissive than allowed by the RFC and other servers routinely reject such requests with 400 responses. There is no known exploit scenario, but it is conceivable that request smuggling could result if jetty is used in combination with a server that does not close the connection after sending such a 400 response. Versions 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16, and 12.0.1 contain a patch for this issue. There is no workaround as there is no known exploit scenario. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34455 | 2 Redhat, Xerial | 7 Amq Broker, Amq Streams, Camel K and 4 more | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| snappy-java is a fast compressor/decompressor for Java. Due to use of an unchecked chunk length, an unrecoverable fatal error can occur in versions prior to 1.1.10.1. The code in the function hasNextChunk in the fileSnappyInputStream.java checks if a given stream has more chunks to read. It does that by attempting to read 4 bytes. If it wasn’t possible to read the 4 bytes, the function returns false. Otherwise, if 4 bytes were available, the code treats them as the length of the next chunk. In the case that the `compressed` variable is null, a byte array is allocated with the size given by the input data. Since the code doesn’t test the legality of the `chunkSize` variable, it is possible to pass a negative number (such as 0xFFFFFFFF which is -1), which will cause the code to raise a `java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException` exception. A worse case would happen when passing a huge positive value (such as 0x7FFFFFFF), which would raise the fatal `java.lang.OutOfMemoryError` error. Version 1.1.10.1 contains a patch for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34462 | 2 Netty, Redhat | 11 Netty, Amq Broker, Amq Clients and 8 more | 2024-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Netty is an asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. The `SniHandler` can allocate up to 16MB of heap for each channel during the TLS handshake. When the handler or the channel does not have an idle timeout, it can be used to make a TCP server using the `SniHandler` to allocate 16MB of heap. The `SniHandler` class is a handler that waits for the TLS handshake to configure a `SslHandler` according to the indicated server name by the `ClientHello` record. For this matter it allocates a `ByteBuf` using the value defined in the `ClientHello` record. Normally the value of the packet should be smaller than the handshake packet but there are not checks done here and the way the code is written, it is possible to craft a packet that makes the `SslClientHelloHandler`. This vulnerability has been fixed in version 4.1.94.Final. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33201 | 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat | 10 Bc-java, Amq Broker, Amq Streams and 7 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Bouncy Castle For Java before 1.74 is affected by an LDAP injection vulnerability. The vulnerability only affects applications that use an LDAP CertStore from Bouncy Castle to validate X.509 certificates. During the certificate validation process, Bouncy Castle inserts the certificate's Subject Name into an LDAP search filter without any escaping, which leads to an LDAP injection vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33008 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Johnzon, Amq Broker, Camel Spring Boot and 1 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Johnzon. A malicious attacker can craft up some JSON input that uses large numbers (numbers such as 1e20000000) that Apache Johnzon will deserialize into BigDecimal and maybe use numbers too large which may result in a slow conversion (Denial of service risk). Apache Johnzon 1.2.21 mitigates this by setting a scale limit of 1000 (by default) to the BigDecimal. This issue affects Apache Johnzon: through 1.2.20. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26048 | 2 Eclipse, Redhat | 8 Jetty, Amq Streams, Camel Spring Boot and 5 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Jetty is a java based web server and servlet engine. In affected versions servlets with multipart support (e.g. annotated with `@MultipartConfig`) that call `HttpServletRequest.getParameter()` or `HttpServletRequest.getParts()` may cause `OutOfMemoryError` when the client sends a multipart request with a part that has a name but no filename and very large content. This happens even with the default settings of `fileSizeThreshold=0` which should stream the whole part content to disk. An attacker client may send a large multipart request and cause the server to throw `OutOfMemoryError`. However, the server may be able to recover after the `OutOfMemoryError` and continue its service -- although it may take some time. This issue has been patched in versions 9.4.51, 10.0.14, and 11.0.14. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may set the multipart parameter `maxRequestSize` which must be set to a non-negative value, so the whole multipart content is limited (although still read into memory). | ||||
| CVE-2023-26049 | 4 Debian, Eclipse, Netapp and 1 more | 15 Debian Linux, Jetty, Active Iq Unified Manager and 12 more | 2024-08-02 | 2.4 Low |
| Jetty is a java based web server and servlet engine. Nonstandard cookie parsing in Jetty may allow an attacker to smuggle cookies within other cookies, or otherwise perform unintended behavior by tampering with the cookie parsing mechanism. If Jetty sees a cookie VALUE that starts with `"` (double quote), it will continue to read the cookie string until it sees a closing quote -- even if a semicolon is encountered. So, a cookie header such as: `DISPLAY_LANGUAGE="b; JSESSIONID=1337; c=d"` will be parsed as one cookie, with the name DISPLAY_LANGUAGE and a value of b; JSESSIONID=1337; c=d instead of 3 separate cookies. This has security implications because if, say, JSESSIONID is an HttpOnly cookie, and the DISPLAY_LANGUAGE cookie value is rendered on the page, an attacker can smuggle the JSESSIONID cookie into the DISPLAY_LANGUAGE cookie and thereby exfiltrate it. This is significant when an intermediary is enacting some policy based on cookies, so a smuggled cookie can bypass that policy yet still be seen by the Jetty server or its logging system. This issue has been addressed in versions 9.4.51, 10.0.14, 11.0.14, and 12.0.0.beta0 and users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | ||||