| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Insufficient validation in ASP BIOS and DRTM commands may allow malicious supervisor x86 software to disclose the contents of sensitive memory which may result in information disclosure.
|
| Improper input validation and bounds checking in SEV firmware may leak scratch buffer bytes leading to potential information disclosure.
|
| Insufficient checks in SEV may lead to a malicious hypervisor disclosing the launch secret potentially resulting in compromise of VM confidentiality.
|
| Insufficient bounds checking in ASP (AMD Secure Processor) firmware while handling BIOS mailbox commands, may allow an attacker to write partially-controlled data out-of-bounds to SMM or SEV-ES regions which may lead to a potential loss of integrity and availability.
|
| Insufficient input validation in the SMU may allow an attacker to improperly lock resources, potentially resulting in a denial of service.
|
| Insufficient bound checks in the SMU may allow an attacker to update the SRAM from/to address space to an invalid value potentially resulting in a denial of service.
|
| Insufficient input validation of BIOS mailbox messages in SMU may result in out-of-bounds memory reads potentially resulting in a denial of service.
|
| Insufficient bound checks in the SMU may allow an attacker to update the from/to address space to an invalid value potentially resulting in a denial of service.
|
| Insufficient input validation in the SMU may allow a physical attacker to exfiltrate SMU memory contents over the I2C bus potentially leading to a loss of confidentiality.
|
| Improper syscall input validation in the ASP Bootloader may allow a privileged attacker to read memory out-of-bounds, potentially leading to a denial-of-service.
|
| Insufficient syscall input validation in the ASP Bootloader may allow a privileged attacker to read memory outside the bounds of a mapped register potentially leading to a denial of service.
|
| TOCTOU in the ASP may allow a physical attacker to write beyond the buffer bounds, potentially leading to a loss of integrity or denial of service.
|
| Failure to initialize
memory in SEV Firmware may allow a privileged attacker to access stale data
from other guests.
|
| A TOCTOU (Time-Of-Check-Time-Of-Use) in SMM may allow
an attacker with ring0 privileges and access to the
BIOS menu or UEFI shell to modify the communications buffer potentially
resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| An out of bounds memory write when processing the AMD
PSP1 Configuration Block (APCB) could allow an attacker with access the ability
to modify the BIOS image, and the ability to sign the resulting image, to
potentially modify the APCB block resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Due to a code bug in
Secure_TSC, SEV firmware may allow an attacker with high privileges to cause a
guest to observe an incorrect TSC when Secure TSC is enabled potentially
resulting in a loss of guest integrity.
|
| Improper re-initialization of IOMMU during the DRTM event
may permit an untrusted platform configuration to persist, allowing an attacker
to read or modify hypervisor memory, potentially resulting in loss of
confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| An issue in “Zen 2” CPUs, under specific microarchitectural circumstances, may allow an attacker to potentially access sensitive information. |
| IBPB may not prevent return branch predictions from being specified by pre-IBPB branch targets leading to a potential information disclosure. |
| An attacker with a compromised ASP could
possibly send malformed commands to an ASP on another CPU, resulting in an out
of bounds write, potentially leading to a loss a loss of integrity.
|
