Filtered by vendor Kubernetes
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Kubernetes
Subscriptions
Total
56 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-1002100 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 3 Kubernetes, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| In all Kubernetes versions prior to v1.11.8, v1.12.6, and v1.13.4, users that are authorized to make patch requests to the Kubernetes API Server can send a specially crafted patch of type "json-patch" (e.g. `kubectl patch --type json` or `"Content-Type: application/json-patch+json"`) that consumes excessive resources while processing, causing a Denial of Service on the API Server. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11244 | 3 Kubernetes, Netapp, Redhat | 4 Kubernetes, Trident, Openshift and 1 more | 2024-08-04 | 5.0 Medium |
| In Kubernetes v1.8.x-v1.14.x, schema info is cached by kubectl in the location specified by --cache-dir (defaulting to $HOME/.kube/http-cache), written with world-writeable permissions (rw-rw-rw-). If --cache-dir is specified and pointed at a different location accessible to other users/groups, the written files may be modified by other users/groups and disrupt the kubectl invocation. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11243 | 2 Kubernetes, Netapp | 2 Kubernetes, Trident | 2024-08-04 | 8.1 High |
| In Kubernetes v1.12.0-v1.12.4 and v1.13.0, the rest.AnonymousClientConfig() method returns a copy of the provided config, with credentials removed (bearer token, username/password, and client certificate/key data). In the affected versions, rest.AnonymousClientConfig() did not effectively clear service account credentials loaded using rest.InClusterConfig() | ||||
| CVE-2019-11251 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Kubernetes, Openshift | 2024-08-04 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Kubernetes kubectl cp command in versions 1.1-1.12, and versions prior to 1.13.11, 1.14.7, and 1.15.4 allows a combination of two symlinks provided by tar output of a malicious container to place a file outside of the destination directory specified in the kubectl cp invocation. This could be used to allow an attacker to place a nefarious file using a symlink, outside of the destination tree. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9946 | 4 Cncf, Kubernetes, Netapp and 1 more | 5 Portmap, Kubernetes, Cloud Insights and 2 more | 2024-08-04 | N/A |
| Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) CNI (Container Networking Interface) 0.7.4 has a network firewall misconfiguration which affects Kubernetes. The CNI 'portmap' plugin, used to setup HostPorts for CNI, inserts rules at the front of the iptables nat chains; which take precedence over the KUBE- SERVICES chain. Because of this, the HostPort/portmap rule could match incoming traffic even if there were better fitting, more specific service definition rules like NodePorts later in the chain. The issue is fixed in CNI 0.7.5 and Kubernetes 1.11.9, 1.12.7, 1.13.5, and 1.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8552 | 3 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Kubernetes, Openshift | 2024-08-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Kubernetes API server component in versions prior to 1.15.9, 1.16.0-1.16.6, and 1.17.0-1.17.2 has been found to be vulnerable to a denial of service attack via successful API requests. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8551 | 3 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Kubernetes, Openshift | 2024-08-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Kubelet component in versions 1.15.0-1.15.9, 1.16.0-1.16.6, and 1.17.0-1.17.2 has been found to be vulnerable to a denial of service attack via the kubelet API, including the unauthenticated HTTP read-only API typically served on port 10255, and the authenticated HTTPS API typically served on port 10250. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25736 | 3 Kubernetes, Microsoft, Redhat | 3 Kubernetes, Windows, Openshift | 2024-08-03 | 5.8 Medium |
| Kube-proxy on Windows can unintentionally forward traffic to local processes listening on the same port (“spec.ports[*].port”) as a LoadBalancer Service when the LoadBalancer controller does not set the “status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip” field. Clusters where the LoadBalancer controller sets the “status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip” field are unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25749 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Kubernetes, Openshift | 2024-08-03 | 7.8 High |
| Windows workloads can run as ContainerAdministrator even when those workloads set the runAsNonRoot option to true. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3294 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Kubernetes, Openshift | 2024-08-03 | 6.6 Medium |
| Users may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server's private network. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3162 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Kubernetes, Openshift | 2024-08-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Users authorized to list or watch one type of namespaced custom resource cluster-wide can read custom resources of a different type in the same API group without authorization. Clusters are impacted by this vulnerability if all of the following are true: 1. There are 2+ CustomResourceDefinitions sharing the same API group 2. Users have cluster-wide list or watch authorization on one of those custom resources. 3. The same users are not authorized to read another custom resource in the same API group. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3955 | 3 Kubernetes, Microsoft, Redhat | 3 Kubernetes, Windows, Openshift | 2024-08-02 | 8.8 High |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods on Windows nodes may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they include Windows nodes. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3676 | 3 Kubernetes, Microsoft, Redhat | 3 Kubernetes, Windows, Openshift | 2024-08-02 | 8.8 High |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods on Windows nodes may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they include Windows nodes. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2727 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 3 Kubernetes, Openshift, Openshift Ironic | 2024-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Users may be able to launch containers using images that are restricted by ImagePolicyWebhook when using ephemeral containers. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ImagePolicyWebhook admission plugin is used together with ephemeral containers. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2728 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 3 Kubernetes, Openshift, Openshift Ironic | 2024-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Users may be able to launch containers that bypass the mountable secrets policy enforced by the ServiceAccount admission plugin when using ephemeral containers. The policy ensures pods running with a service account may only reference secrets specified in the service account’s secrets field. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ServiceAccount admission plugin and the `kubernetes.io/enforce-mountable-secrets` annotation are used together with ephemeral containers. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2431 | 3 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Kubernetes, Openshift | 2024-08-02 | 3.4 Low |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubelet that allows pods to bypass the seccomp profile enforcement. Pods that use localhost type for seccomp profile but specify an empty profile field, are affected by this issue. In this scenario, this vulnerability allows the pod to run in unconfined (seccomp disabled) mode. This bug affects Kubelet. | ||||