Filtered by vendor Rubyonrails Subscriptions
Filtered by product Ruby On Rails Subscriptions
Total 50 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2012-2694 4 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Redhat, Rhel Sam and 1 more 5 1, Openshift, 1.1 and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/http/request.rb in Ruby on Rails before 3.0.14, 3.1.x before 3.1.6, and 3.2.x before 3.2.6 does not properly consider differences in parameter handling between the Active Record component and the Rack interface, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended database-query restrictions and perform NULL checks via a crafted request, as demonstrated by certain "['xyz', nil]" values, a related issue to CVE-2012-2660.
CVE-2012-2695 4 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Redhat, Rhel Sam and 1 more 5 1, Openshift, 1.1 and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
The Active Record component in Ruby on Rails before 3.0.14, 3.1.x before 3.1.6, and 3.2.x before 3.2.6 does not properly implement the passing of request data to a where method in an ActiveRecord class, which allows remote attackers to conduct certain SQL injection attacks via nested query parameters that leverage improper handling of nested hashes, a related issue to CVE-2012-2661.
CVE-2009-4214 1 Rubyonrails 2 Rails, Ruby On Rails 2025-04-09 N/A
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the strip_tags function in Ruby on Rails before 2.2.s, and 2.3.x before 2.3.5, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving non-printing ASCII characters, related to HTML::Tokenizer and actionpack/lib/action_controller/vendor/html-scanner/html/node.rb.
CVE-2009-2422 2 Apple, Rubyonrails 3 Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server, Ruby On Rails 2025-04-09 9.8 Critical
The example code for the digest authentication functionality (http_authentication.rb) in Ruby on Rails before 2.3.3 defines an authenticate_or_request_with_http_digest block that returns nil instead of false when the user does not exist, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass authentication for applications that are derived from this example by sending an invalid username without a password.
CVE-2008-4094 1 Rubyonrails 2 Rails, Ruby On Rails 2025-04-09 N/A
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Ruby on Rails before 2.1.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) :limit and (2) :offset parameters, related to ActiveRecord, ActiveSupport, ActiveResource, ActionPack, and ActionMailer.
CVE-2007-6077 1 Rubyonrails 2 Rails, Ruby On Rails 2025-04-09 N/A
The session fixation protection mechanism in cgi_process.rb in Rails 1.2.4, as used in Ruby on Rails, removes the :cookie_only attribute from the DEFAULT_SESSION_OPTIONS constant, which effectively causes cookie_only to be applied only to the first instantiation of CgiRequest, which allows remote attackers to conduct session fixation attacks. NOTE: this is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-5380.
CVE-2008-5189 1 Rubyonrails 2 Rails, Ruby On Rails 2025-04-09 N/A
CRLF injection vulnerability in Ruby on Rails before 2.0.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted URL to the redirect_to function.
CVE-2006-4111 1 Rubyonrails 2 Rails, Ruby On Rails 2025-04-03 N/A
Ruby on Rails before 1.1.5 allows remote attackers to execute Ruby code with "severe" or "serious" impact via a File Upload request with an HTTP header that modifies the LOAD_PATH variable, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-4112.
CVE-2017-17920 1 Rubyonrails 1 Ruby On Rails 2024-11-21 N/A
SQL injection vulnerability in the 'reorder' method in Ruby on Rails 5.1.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the 'name' parameter. NOTE: The vendor disputes this issue because the documentation states that this method is not intended for use with untrusted input
CVE-2017-17919 1 Rubyonrails 1 Ruby On Rails 2024-11-21 8.1 High
SQL injection vulnerability in the 'order' method in Ruby on Rails 5.1.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the 'id desc' parameter. NOTE: The vendor disputes this issue because the documentation states that this method is not intended for use with untrusted input