| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Edimax AC1200 Wave 2 Dual-Band Gigabit Router BR-6478AC V3_1.0.15 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the foldername in /boafrm/formDiskCreateShare. |
| RE11S v1.11 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the rootAPmac parameter in the formiNICbasicREP function. |
| The UPnP IGD implementation in Edimax EdiLinux on the Edimax BR-6104K with firmware before 3.25, Edimax 6114Wg, Canyon-Tech CN-WF512 with firmware 1.83, Canyon-Tech CN-WF514 with firmware 2.08, Sitecom WL-153 with firmware before 1.39, and Sweex LB000021 with firmware 3.15 allows remote attackers to establish arbitrary port mappings by sending a UPnP AddPortMapping action in a SOAP request to the WAN interface, related to an "external forwarding" vulnerability. |
| The UPnP IGD implementation in Edimax EdiLinux on the Edimax BR-6104K with firmware before 3.25, Edimax 6114Wg, Canyon-Tech CN-WF512 with firmware 1.83, Canyon-Tech CN-WF514 with firmware 2.08, Sitecom WL-153 with firmware before 1.39, and Sweex LB000021 with firmware 3.15 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters. |
| RE11S v1.11 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the pptpUserName parameter in the setWAN function. |
| RE11S v1.11 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the command parameter at /goform/mp. |
| RE11S v1.11 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the L2TPUserName parameter at /goform/setWAN. |
| RE11S v1.11 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the selSSID parameter in the formWlSiteSurvey function. |
| RE11S v1.11 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the component /goform/formAccept. |
| RE11S v1.11 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the rootAPmac parameter in the formStaDrvSetup function. |
| RE11S v1.11 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the pppUserName parameter in the formPPPoESetup function. |
| Command Injection vulnerability in Edimax Technology Co., Ltd. Wireless Router N300 Firmware BR428nS v3 allows attacker to execute arbitrary code via the formWlanMP function. |
| A Command Injection vulnerability in Edimax Wireless Router N300 Firmware BR-6428NS_v4 allows attacker to execute arbitrary code via the formAccept function in /bin/webs without any limitations. |
| A Command Injection vulnerability in Edimax Wireless Router N300 Firmware BR-6428NS_v4 allows attacker to execute arbitrary code via the mp function in /bin/webs without any limitations. |
| A Command Injection vulnerability in Edimax Wireless Router N300 Firmware BR-6428NS_v4 allows attacker to execute arbitrary code via the setWAN function in /bin/webs without any limitations. |
| EDIMAX BR-6288ACL v1.12 was discovered to contain an authenticated remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability via the pppUserName parameter. |
| The firmware of EDIMAX IC-3140W Version 3.11 is hardcoded with Administrator username and password. |
| The default administrator account & password of the EDIMAX wireless network camera is hard-coded. Remote attackers can disassemble firmware to obtain the privileged permission and further control the devices. |
| A stack-based buffer-overflow exists in Edimax IP-Camera IC-3116W (v3.06) and IC-3140W (v3.07), which allows an unauthenticated, unauthorized attacker to perform remote-code-execution due to a crafted GET-Request. The overflow occurs in binary ipcam_cgi due to a missing type check in function doGetSysteminfo(). This has been fixed in version: IC-3116W v3.08. |
| Edimax BR-6208AC V1 devices have Insufficient Compartmentalization between a host network and a guest network that are established by the same device. They forward ARP requests, which are sent as broadcast packets, between the host and the guest networks. To use this leakage as a direct covert channel, the sender can trivially issue an ARP request to an arbitrary computer on the network. (In general, some routers restrict ARP forwarding only to requests destined for the network's subnet mask, but these routers did not restrict this traffic in any way. Depending on this factor, one must use either the lower 8 bits of the IP address, or the entire 32 bits, as the data payload.) |