Kong Mesh: default control plane config leaks the admin token cross-origin via a CORS wildcard and localhost admin

The default kuma-cp configuration in Kong Mesh reveals the admin bootstrap token and signing keys to any webpage the operator visits while the control plane is reachable from their browser. Due to a CORS misconfiguration a cross-origin fetch() from a malicious page returns the admin JWT and signing material.

Kong Mesh: the kuma-dp readiness service exposes the Envoy admin API without authentication

When kuma-dp is configured with the Envoy admin API on a Unix domain socket, which is the default, its readiness service on TCP port 9902 - bound to all interfaces - forwards almost the entire Envoy admin API to any caller that can reach the port, with no authentication. An attacker with network access to a data plane's port 9902, for example another pod on the cluster network, can read Envoy and data plane configuration without credentials: config dumps, cluster and listener lists, stats, and the mesh trust bundle. Exposure is read-only - destructive Envoy admin actions are blocked and private keys are not exposed.

Heap buffer overflow in Modbusgwd

In Teltonika Networks RUTOS devices, a vulnerability exists in modbusgwd due to improper handling of Modbus TCP request data. A remote, unauthenticated attacker with access to the affected service could trigger a heap-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service.

Timing side-channel in RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decryption in Oberon PSA Crypto

Padding oracle attack vulnerability in Oberon microsystem AG’s Oberon PSA Crypto library in all versions since 1.0.0 and prior to 2.1.1 allows an attacker to recover plaintexts via timing measurements of RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt operations.

Timing side-channel in RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decryption in ocrypto

Padding oracle attack vulnerability in Oberon microsystem AG’s ocrypto library in all versions since 3.0.0 and prior to 4.0.1 allows an attacker to recover plaintexts via timing measurements of RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt operations.

Amelia < 2.4.6 - Provider+ Cross-Customer Appointment Data Disclosure via IDOR

The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.4.6 does not verify that an authenticated employee (provider) is assigned to the appointment being accessed, allowing any employee to read any appointment by its identifier and disclose the booked customer's personal data.

Customer Email Verification for WooCommerce < 3.2.6 - Unauthenticated Account Takeover via Type-Juggling Authentication Bypass

The Customer Email Verification for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 3.2.6 does not correctly validate the email-verification activation code, relying on a loose comparison that an attacker can satisfy with a crafted value type, allowing unauthenticated users to verify and take over the account of any registered user who has not yet confirmed their email address.

Authentication Bypass

Zohocorp ManageEngine Password Manager Pro versions before 13232 and PAM360 versions before 8551 are vulnerable to an authentication bypass vulnerability due to improper SAML validation.

Forcepoint One Endpoint SafariExtension Disable Bypass

This vulnerability allows a normal (non-admin) user to disable the Forcepoint One Endpoint SafariExtension and bypass DLP protection in F1E Mac OS before v26.04.5758.

SQL Injection

Zohocorp ManageEngine Password Manager Pro versions before 13232 and ManageEngine PAM360 versions before 8552 are vulnerable to authenticated SQL injection.

Fooocus webui vulnerable to Remote Code Execution

Fooocus is an image generating software. In versions 2.5.5 and prior, the Fooocus web UI is vulnerable to remote code execution due to the unsafe use of eval when processing metadata JSON. An attacker with access to the Fooocus web UI may be able to execute arbitrary code on the instance. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available, but a suggested fix pull request is available.

Remote Code Execution in OpenWebUI via Arbitrary File Upload

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.

This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.