| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cisco Gigabit Switch Routers (GSR) with Fast Ethernet / Gigabit Ethernet cards, from IOS versions 11.2(15)GS1A up to 11.2(19)GS0.2 and some versions of 12.0, do not properly handle line card failures, which allows remote attackers to bypass ACLs or force the interface to stop forwarding packets. |
| Cisco IOS 12.0S, 12.2, and 12.3, with Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a malformed OSPF packet. |
| Cisco Catalyst 2900 Virtual LAN (VLAN) switches allow remote attackers to inject 802.1q frames into another VLAN by forging the VLAN identifier in the trunking tag. |
| Cisco devices IOS 12.0 and earlier allow a remote attacker to cause a crash, or bad route updates, via malformed BGP updates with unrecognized transitive attribute. |
| Cisco routers and switches running IOS 12.0 through 12.2.1 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a flood of UDP packets. |
| Vulnerability in Cisco IOS 11.1CC and 11.1CT with distributed fast switching (DFS) enabled allows remote attackers to bypass certain access control lists when the router switches traffic from a DFS-enabled interface to an interface that does not have DFS enabled, as described by Cisco bug CSCdk35564. |
| ICMP information such as (1) netmask and (2) timestamp is allowed from arbitrary hosts. |
| In Cisco routers under some versions of IOS 12.0 running NAT, some packets may not be filtered by input access list filters. |
| Cisco IOS 12.1YD, 12.2T, 12.3 and 12.3T, when configured for the IOS Telephony Service (ITS), CallManager Express (CME) or Survivable Remote Site Telephony (SRST), allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reboot) via a malformed packet to the SCCP port. |
| Vulnerability in Cisco IOS 11.1 through 11.3 with distributed fast switching (DFS) enabled allows remote attackers to bypass certain access control lists when the router switches traffic from a DFS-enabled input interface to an output interface with a logical subinterface, as described by Cisco bug CSCdk43862. |
| In Cisco IOS 10.3, with the tacacs-ds or tacacs keyword, an extended IP access control list could bypass filtering. |
| Some classic Cisco IOS devices have a vulnerability in the PPP CHAP authentication to establish unauthorized PPP connections. |
| Cisco PIX firewall and CBAC IP fragmentation attack results in a denial of service. |
| Cisco IOS 12.0 and other versions can be crashed by malicious UDP packets to the syslog port. |
| The design of the Hot Standby Routing Protocol (HSRP), as implemented on Cisco IOS 12.1, when using IRPAS, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a router with the same IP address as the interface on which HSRP is running, which causes a loop. |
| Buffer overflow in Cisco TACACS+ tac_plus server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a malformed packet with a long length field. |
| The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation in multiple Cisco products including IP Phone models 7940 and 7960, IOS versions in the 12.2 train, and Secure PIX 5.2.9 to 6.2.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted INVITE messages, as demonstrated by the OUSPG PROTOS c07-sip test suite. |
| The SSL/TLS handshaking code in OpenSSL 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b, and 0.9.7c, when using Kerberos ciphersuites, does not properly check the length of Kerberos tickets during a handshake, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that causes an out-of-bounds read. |
| OpenSSL 0.9.6k allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash via large recursion) via malformed ASN.1 sequences. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementation in multiple Cisco products allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reset) via certain malformed IKE packets, as demonstrated by the PROTOS ISAKMP Test Suite for IKEv1. NOTE: due to the lack of details in the Cisco advisory, it is unclear which of CVE-2005-3666, CVE-2005-3667, and/or CVE-2005-3668 this issue applies to. |