Search
Search Results (67 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2001-0052 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 Universal Database version 6.1 allows users to cause a denial of service via a malformed query. | ||||
| CVE-2006-3066 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the TCP/IP listener in IBM DB2 Universal Database (UDB) before 8.1 FixPak 12 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a long MGRLVLLS message inside of an EXCSAT message when establishing a connection. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4735 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 Universal Database (UDB) 810 before 8.1 FP10 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (application crash) via (1) certain equality predicates that trigger self-removal, aka IY70808; and (2) a query with more than 32000 elements in the IN-list, aka LI70817. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4736 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 Universal Database (UDB) 820 before 8.2 FP10 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (disk consumption) via a hash join (hsjn) that triggers an infinite loop in sqlri_hsjnFlushBlocks. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4737 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 Universal Database (UDB) 820 before ESE AIX 5765F4100 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by "abnormally" terminating a connection, which prevents db2agents from being properly cleared. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4865 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in call in IBM DB2 7.x and 8.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long libname. | ||||
| CVE-2010-3739 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The audit facility in the Security component in IBM DB2 UDB 9.5 before FP6a uses instance-level audit settings to capture connection (aka CONNECT and AUTHENTICATION) events in certain circumstances in which database-level audit settings were intended, which might make it easier for remote attackers to connect without discovery. | ||||