Search Results (9281 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2023-53961 1 Sound4 3 First, Impact, Pulse-eco 2025-12-23 5.3 Medium
SOUND4 IMPACT/FIRST/PULSE/Eco v2.x contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit HTTP requests to the radio processing interface, triggering unintended administrative operations when a logged-in user visits the page.
CVE-2025-14163 2 Leap13, Wordpress 2 Premium Addons For Elementor, Wordpress 2025-12-23 4.3 Medium
The Premium Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.11.53. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'insert_inner_template' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create arbitrary Elementor templates via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or other user with the edit_posts capability into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-52841 3 Apple, Laundry Project, Linux 3 Macos, Laundry, Linux Kernel 2025-12-23 8.8 High
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This issue affects Laundry: 2.3.0.
CVE-2025-47967 2 Google, Microsoft 3 Android, Edge, Edge Chromium 2025-12-23 4.7 Medium
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
CVE-2024-12642 1 Cht 1 Tenderdoctransfer 2025-12-23 8.1 High
TenderDocTransfer from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Write vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection for the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains a Relative Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to write arbitrary files to any path on the user's system.
CVE-2025-10498 2 Ninjaforms, Wordpress 2 Ninja Forms, Wordpress 2025-12-23 4.3 Medium
The Ninja Forms – The Contact Form Builder That Grows With You plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.12.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when exporting CSV files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete those files granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-10499 2 Ninjaforms, Wordpress 2 Ninja Forms, Wordpress 2025-12-23 4.3 Medium
The Ninja Forms – The Contact Form Builder That Grows With You plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.12.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the maybe_opt_in() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to opt an affected site into usage statistics collection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-34430 2 1panel, Fit2cloud 2 1panel, 1panel 2025-12-23 4.3 Medium
1Panel versions 1.10.33 through 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the panel name management functionality. The affected endpoint does not implement CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a panel-name change request; if a victim visits the page while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows a remote attacker to change the victim’s panel name to an arbitrary value without consent.
CVE-2025-34429 2 1panel, Fit2cloud 2 1panel, 1panel 2025-12-23 7.1 High
1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web port configuration functionality. The port-change endpoint lacks CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a port-change request; when a victim visits it while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows an attacker to change the port on which the 1Panel web service listens, causing loss of access on the original port and resulting in service disruption or denial of service, and may unintentionally expose the service on an attacker-chosen port.
CVE-2025-11543 2025-12-23 N/A
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Sharp Display Solutions projectors allows a attacker may create and run unauthorized firmware.
CVE-2025-14168 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-12-23 4.3 Medium
The WP DB Booster plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the cleanup_all AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete database records including post drafts, revisions, comments, and metadata via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-68481 1 Fastapi-users 1 Fastapi-users 2025-12-23 5.9 Medium
FastAPI Users allows users to quickly add a registration and authentication system to their FastAPI project. Prior to version 15.0.2, the OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. `generate_state_token()` is always called with an empty `state_data` dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. On callback, the library merely checks that the JWT verifies under `state_secret` and is unexpired; there is no attempt to match the state value to the browser that initiated the OAuth request, no correlation cookie, and no server-side cache. Any attacker can hit `/authorize`, capture the server-generated state, finish the upstream OAuth flow with their own provider account, and then trick a victim into loading `.../callback?code=<attacker_code>&state=<attacker_state>`. Because the state JWT is valid for any client for \~1 hour, the victim’s browser will complete the flow. This leads to login CSRF. Depending on the app’s logic, the login CSRF can lead to an account takeover of the victim account or to the victim user getting logged in to the attacker's account. Version 15.0.2 contains a patch for the issue.
CVE-2025-13365 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-12-23 6.1 Medium
The WP Hallo Welt plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'hallo_welt_seite' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Due to the insufficient input sanitization and output escaping, this can lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting.
CVE-2025-14164 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-12-23 4.3 Medium
The Quran Gateway plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing nonce validation in the quran_gateway_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's display settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-14734 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-12-23 5.4 Medium
The Amazon affiliate lite Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'ADAL_settings_page' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-65857 2025-12-23 7.5 High
An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.
CVE-2025-34410 2 1panel, Fit2cloud 2 1panel, 1panel 2025-12-23 7.1 High
1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Change Username functionality available from the settings panel (/settings/panel). The endpoint does not implement CSRF protections such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a username-change request; when a victim visits the page while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows an attacker to change the victim’s 1Panel username without consent. After the change, the victim is logged out and unable to log in with the previous username, resulting in account lockout and denial of service.
CVE-2025-8383 2 Averta, Wordpress 2 Slider And Popup Builder By Depicter, Wordpress 2025-12-22 4.3 Medium
The Depicter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions less than, or equal to, 4.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the depicter-document-rules-store function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify document rules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-64133 1 Jenkins 2 Extensible Choice Parameter, Jenkins 2025-12-22 5.4 Medium
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Extensible Choice Parameter Plugin 239.v5f5c278708cf and earlier allows attackers to execute sandboxed Groovy code.
CVE-2024-12087 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more 26 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 23 more 2025-12-22 6.5 Medium
A path traversal vulnerability exists in rsync. It stems from behavior enabled by the `--inc-recursive` option, a default-enabled option for many client options and can be enabled by the server even if not explicitly enabled by the client. When using the `--inc-recursive` option, a lack of proper symlink verification coupled with deduplication checks occurring on a per-file-list basis could allow a server to write files outside of the client's intended destination directory. A malicious server could write malicious files to arbitrary locations named after valid directories/paths on the client.