Total
1279 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-25972 | 1 Tuzitio | 1 Camaleon Cms | 2024-08-03 | 4.9 Medium |
| In Camaleon CMS, versions 2.1.2.0 to 2.6.0, are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the media upload feature, which allows admin users to fetch media files from external URLs but fails to validate URLs referencing to localhost or other internal servers. This allows attackers to read files stored in the internal server. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25640 | 1 Apache | 1 Dubbo | 2024-08-03 | 6.1 Medium |
| In Apache Dubbo prior to 2.6.9 and 2.7.9, the usage of parseURL method will lead to the bypass of white host check which can cause open redirect or SSRF vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25241 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 3 Windows, Apex One, Worry-free Business Security | 2024-08-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to locate online agents via a sweep. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25236 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 3 Windows, Officescan, Worry-free Business Security | 2024-08-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro OfficeScan XG SP1 and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to locate online agents via a specific sweep. | ||||
| CVE-2021-24472 | 1 Qantumthemes | 2 Kentharadio, Onair2 | 2024-08-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| The OnAir2 WordPress theme before 3.9.9.2 and QT KenthaRadio WordPress plugin before 2.0.2 have exposed proxy functionality to unauthenticated users, sending requests to this proxy functionality will have the web server fetch and display the content from any URI, this would allow for SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) and RFI (Remote File Inclusion) vulnerabilities on the website. | ||||
| CVE-2021-24371 | 1 Carrcommunications | 1 Rsvpmaker | 2024-08-03 | 2.7 Low |
| The Import feature of the RSVPMaker WordPress plugin before 8.7.3 (/wp-admin/tools.php?page=rsvpmaker_export_screen) takes an URL input and calls curl on it, without first validating it to ensure it's a remote one. As a result, a high privilege user could use that feature to scan the internal network via a SSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2021-24150 | 1 Likebtn-like-button Project | 1 Likebtn-like-button | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| The LikeBtn WordPress Like Button Rating ♥ LikeBtn WordPress plugin before 2.6.32 was vulnerable to Unauthenticated Full-Read Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2021-23927 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite | 2024-08-03 | 6.4 Medium |
| OX App Suite through 7.10.4 allows SSRF via a URL with an @ character in an appsuite/api/oauth/proxy PUT request. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22958 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2024-08-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability was found in concrete5 < 8.5.5 that allowed a decimal notation encoded IP address to bypass the limitations in place for localhost allowing interaction with local services. Impact can vary depending on services exposed.CVSSv2.0 AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N | ||||
| CVE-2021-22986 | 1 F5 | 15 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall and 12 more | 2024-08-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, and 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3 amd BIG-IQ 7.1.0.x before 7.1.0.3 and 7.0.0.x before 7.0.0.2, the iControl REST interface has an unauthenticated remote command execution vulnerability. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2021-23029 | 1 F5 | 2 Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall, Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2024-08-03 | 8.8 High |
| On version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, insufficient permission checks may allow authenticated users with guest privileges to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks through F5 Advanced Web Application Firewall (WAF) and the BIG-IP ASM Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22969 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2024-08-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| Concrete CMS (formerly concrete5) versions below 8.5.7 has a SSRF mitigation bypass using DNS Rebind attack giving an attacker the ability to fetch cloud IAAS (ex AWS) IAM keys.To fix this Concrete CMS no longer allows downloads from the local network and specifies the validated IP when downloading rather than relying on DNS.Discoverer: Adrian Tiron from FORTBRIDGE ( https://www.fortbridge.co.uk/ )The Concrete CMS team gave this a CVSS 3.1 score of 3.5 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N . Please note that Cloud IAAS provider mis-configurations are not Concrete CMS vulnerabilities. A mitigation for this vulnerability is to make sure that the IMDS configurations are according to a cloud provider's best practices.This fix is also in Concrete version 9.0.0 | ||||
| CVE-2021-22970 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| Concrete CMS (formerly concrete5) versions 8.5.6 and below and version 9.0.0 allow local IP importing causing the system to be vulnerable toa. SSRF attacks on the private LAN servers by reading files from the local LAN. An attacker can pivot in the private LAN and exploit local network appsandb. SSRF Mitigation Bypass through DNS RebindingConcrete CMS security team gave this a CVSS score of 3.5 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:NConcrete CMS is maintaining Concrete version 8.5.x until 1 May 2022 for security fixes.This CVE is shared with HackerOne Reports https://hackerone.com/reports/1364797 and https://hackerone.com/reports/1360016Reporters: Adrian Tiron from FORTBRIDGE (https://www.fortbridge.co.uk/ ) and Bipul Jaiswal | ||||
| CVE-2021-22821 | 1 Schneider-electric | 12 Evlink City Evc1s22p4, Evlink City Evc1s22p4 Firmware, Evlink City Evc1s7p4 and 9 more | 2024-08-03 | 8.6 High |
| A CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause the station web server to forward requests to unintended network targets when crafted malicious parameters are submitted to the charging station web server. Affected Products: EVlink City EVC1S22P4 / EVC1S7P4 (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2 ), EVlink Parking EVW2 / EVF2 / EVP2PE (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2), and EVlink Smart Wallbox EVB1A (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2) | ||||
| CVE-2021-22696 | 3 Apache, Oracle, Redhat | 8 Cxf, Business Intelligence, Communications Diameter Intelligence Hub and 5 more | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| CXF supports (via JwtRequestCodeFilter) passing OAuth 2 parameters via a JWT token as opposed to query parameters (see: The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR)). Instead of sending a JWT token as a "request" parameter, the spec also supports specifying a URI from which to retrieve a JWT token from via the "request_uri" parameter. CXF was not validating the "request_uri" parameter (apart from ensuring it uses "https) and was making a REST request to the parameter in the request to retrieve a token. This means that CXF was vulnerable to DDos attacks on the authorization server, as specified in section 10.4.1 of the spec. This issue affects Apache CXF versions prior to 3.4.3; Apache CXF versions prior to 3.3.10. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22726 | 1 Schneider-electric | 12 Evlink City Evc1s22p4, Evlink City Evc1s22p4 Firmware, Evlink City Evc1s7p4 and 9 more | 2024-08-03 | 8.1 High |
| A CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in EVlink City (EVC1S22P4 / EVC1S7P4 all versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.1), EVlink Parking (EVW2 / EVF2 / EV.2 all versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.1), and EVlink Smart Wallbox (EVB1A all versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.1 ) that could allow an attacker to perform unintended actions or access to data when crafted malicious parameters are submitted to the charging station web server. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22255 | 1 Baserow | 1 Baserow | 2024-08-03 | 7.7 High |
| SSRF in URL file upload in Baserow <1.1.0 allows remote authenticated users to retrieve files from the internal server network exposed over HTTP by inserting an internal address. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22175 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-08-03 | 6.8 Medium |
| When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 10.5 was possible to exploit for an unauthenticated attacker even on a GitLab instance where registration is disabled | ||||
| CVE-2021-22214 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-08-03 | 6.8 Medium |
| When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 10.5 was possible to exploit for an unauthenticated attacker even on a GitLab instance where registration is limited | ||||
| CVE-2021-22178 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-08-03 | 5 Medium |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 13.2. Gitlab was vulnerable to SRRF attack through the Prometheus integration. | ||||