| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Favicon Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the output_sub_admin_page_0 function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files on the server via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The plugin author deleted the functionality of the plugin to patch this issue and close the plugin, we recommend seeking an alternative to this plugin. |
| The Tutor LMS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.7.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'addon_enable_disable' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enable or disable addons via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Gixaw Chat WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. |
| The Stream plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the network_options_action() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can lead to DoS or privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| This vulnerability exists in the Apex Softcell LD Geo due to improper validation of the transaction token ID in the API endpoint. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the transaction token ID in the API request leading to unauthorized access and modification of transactions belonging to other users. |
| An attacker with no knowledge of the current users in the web application, could build a dictionary of potential users and check the server responses as it indicates whether or not the user is present in CIRCUTOR Q-SMT in its firmware version 1.0.4. |
| The BA Book Everything plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.20. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the my_account_update() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update a user's account details via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This can be leveraged to reset a user's password and gain access to their account. |
| This vulnerability exists in Apex Softcell LD DP Back Office due to improper validation of certain parameters (cCdslClicentcode and cLdClientCode) in the API endpoint. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameters in the API request body leading to exposure of sensitive information belonging to other users. |
| This vulnerability exists in Apex Softcell LD Geo due to improper validation of the certain parameters (Client ID, DPID or BOID) in the API endpoint. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameters in the API request body leading to exposure of sensitive information belonging to other users. |
| The Easy Property Listings WordPress plugin before 3.5.4 does not have CSRF check when deleting contacts in bulk, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack |
| FrogCMS V0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/plugin/file_manager/delete/123 |
| FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /admin/?/user/add |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LikeBtn Like Button Rating allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Like Button Rating: from n/a through 2.6.54. |
| XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform. The REST API exposes the history of any page in XWiki of which the attacker knows the name. The exposed information includes for each modification of the page the time of the modification, the version number, the author of the modification (both username and displayed name) and the version comment. This information is exposed regardless of the rights setup, and even when the wiki is configured to be fully private. On a private wiki, this can be tested by accessing /xwiki/rest/wikis/xwiki/spaces/Main/pages/WebHome/history, if this shows the history of the main page then the installation is vulnerable. This has been patched in XWiki 15.10.9 and XWiki 16.3.0RC1. |
| An improperly implemented security check for standard vulnerability [CWE-358] in FortiADC Web Application Firewall (WAF) 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2 all versions, 7.1 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.1 all versions, 6.0 all versions when cookie security policy is enabled may allow an attacker, under specific conditions, to retrieve the initial encrypted and signed cookie protected by the feature |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in lunary-ai/lunary version 1.2.34 due to overly permissive CORS settings. This vulnerability allows an attacker to sign up for and create projects or use the instance as if they were a user with local access. The main attack vector is for instances hosted locally on personal machines, which are not publicly accessible. The CORS settings in the backend permit all origins, exposing unauthenticated endpoints to CSRF attacks. |
| Improper access control in the clipboard synchronization feature in TeamViewer Full Client prior version 15.57 and TeamViewer Meeting prior version 15.55.3 can lead to unintentional sharing of the clipboard with the current presenter of a meeting. |
| This vulnerability exists in Reedos aiM-Star version 2.0.1 due to improper validation of the ‘mode’ parameter in the API endpoint used during the registration process. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameter in the API request body on the vulnerable application.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to bypass certain constraints in the registration process leading to creation of multiple accounts. |
| This vulnerability exists in Reedos aiM-Star version 2.0.1 due to transmission of sensitive information in plain text in certain API endpoints. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating a parameter through API request URL and intercepting response of the API request leading to exposure of sensitive information belonging to other users. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress LearnPress.This issue affects LearnPress: from n/a through 4.2.6.8.2. |
