| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themeum Tutor LMS.This issue affects Tutor LMS: from n/a through 2.7.2. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sender Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce.This issue affects Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.6.18. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10up Simple Local Avatars.This issue affects Simple Local Avatars: from n/a through 2.7.10. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPMU DEV Hummingbird.This issue affects Hummingbird: from n/a through 3.9.1. |
| The ImageRecycle pdf & image compression plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.14. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions in the class/class-image-otimizer.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings along with performing other actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stormhill Media MyBookTable Bookstore allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects MyBookTable Bookstore: from n/a through 3.3.9. |
| The Music Request Manager WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack |
| The Insert PHP Code Snippet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the /admin/snippets.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to activate/deactivate and delete code snippets via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Bricks theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'save_settings' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the theme's settings, including enabling a setting which allows lower-privileged users such as contributors to perform code execution, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Bricks theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'reset_settings' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the theme's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Download Plugins and Themes in ZIP from Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the download_theme() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to download arbitrary themes from the website via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. In versions prior to 1.8.6 it was possible to download the entire sites files. |
| After careful review of CVE-2024-5203, it has been determined that the issue is not exploitable in real-world scenarios. Moreover, the exploit assumes that the attacker has access to a session code parameter that matches a cookie on the Keycloak server. However the attacker does not have access to the cookie, and can therefore not craft a malicious request. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Naiche Dark Mode for WP Dashboard.This issue affects Dark Mode for WP Dashboard: from n/a through 1.2.3. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Checkout Plugins Stripe Payments For WooCommerce by Checkout.This issue affects Stripe Payments For WooCommerce by Checkout: from n/a through 1.9.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Softaculous Team SpeedyCache.This issue affects SpeedyCache: from n/a through 1.1.8. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Passionate Programmers B.V. WP Data Access.This issue affects WP Data Access: from n/a through 5.5.7. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brevo Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue.This issue affects Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue: from n/a through 3.1.82. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPBackItUp Backup and Restore WordPress.This issue affects Backup and Restore WordPress: from n/a through 1.50. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Analytify.This issue affects Analytify: from n/a through 5.3.1. |
| Homepage is a highly customizable homepage with Docker and service API integrations. The default setup of homepage 0.9.1 is vulnerable to DNS rebinding. Homepage is setup without certificate and authentication by default, leaving it to vulnerable to DNS rebinding. In this attack, an attacker will ask a user to visit his/her website. The attacker website will then change the DNS records of their domain from their IP address to the internal IP address of the homepage instance. To tell which IP addresses are valid, we can rebind a subdomain to each IP address we want to check, and see if there is a response. Once potential candidates have been found, the attacker can launch the attack by reading the response of the webserver after the IP address has changed. When the attacker domain is fetched, the response will be from the homepage instance, not the attacker website, because the IP address has been changed. Due to a lack of authentication, a user’s private information such as API keys (fixed after first report) and other private information can then be extracted by the attacker website. |
