Filtered by vendor Siemens
Subscriptions
Total
1927 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-33715 | 1 Siemens | 1 Jt Utilities | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in JT Utilities (All versions < V13.0.2.0). When parsing specially crafted JT files, a race condition could cause an object to be released before being operated on, leading to NULL pointer deference condition and causing the application to crash. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to cause a Denial-of-Service condition in the application. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33714 | 1 Siemens | 1 Jt Utilities | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in JT Utilities (All versions < V13.0.2.0). When parsing specially crafted JT files, a missing check for the validity of an iterator leads to NULL pointer deference condition, causing the application to crash. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to cause a Denial-of-Service condition in the application. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33713 | 1 Siemens | 1 Jt Utilities | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in JT Utilities (All versions < V13.0.2.0). When parsing specially crafted JT files, a hash function is called with an incorrect argument leading the application to crash. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to cause a Denial-of-Service condition in the application. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33711 | 1 Siemens | 1 Teamcenter Active Workspace | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter Active Workspace V4 (All versions < V4.3.9), Teamcenter Active Workspace V5.0 (All versions < V5.0.7), Teamcenter Active Workspace V5.1 (All versions < V5.1.4). The affected application allows verbose error messages which allow leaking of sensitive information, such as full paths. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33710 | 1 Siemens | 1 Teamcenter Active Workspace | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter Active Workspace V4 (All versions < V4.3.9), Teamcenter Active Workspace V5.0 (All versions < V5.0.7), Teamcenter Active Workspace V5.1 (All versions < V5.1.4). A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the web interface of the affected devices that could allow an attacker to execute malicious JavaScript code by tricking users into accessing a malicious link. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33709 | 1 Siemens | 1 Teamcenter Active Workspace | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter Active Workspace V4 (All versions < V4.3.9), Teamcenter Active Workspace V5.0 (All versions < V5.0.7), Teamcenter Active Workspace V5.1 (All versions < V5.1.4). By sending malformed requests, a remote attacker could leak an application token due to an error not properly handled by the system. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33627 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 29 Insydeh2o, Simatic Field Pg M5, Simatic Field Pg M5 Firmware and 26 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| An issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O Kernel 5.0 before 05.09.11, 5.1 before 05.17.11, 5.2 before 05.27.11, 5.3 before 05.36.11, 5.4 before 05.44.11, and 5.5 before 05.52.11 affecting FwBlockServiceSmm. Software SMI services that use the Communicate() function of the EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL do not check whether the address of the buffer is valid, which allows use of SMRAM, MMIO, or OS kernel addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33626 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 33 Insydeh2o, Ruggedcom Apr1808, Ruggedcom Apr1808 Firmware and 30 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability exists in SMM (System Management Mode) branch that registers a SWSMI handler that does not sufficiently check or validate the allocated buffer pointer(QWORD values for CommBuffer). This can be used by an attacker to corrupt data in SMRAM memory and even lead to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33625 | 3 Insyde, Netapp, Siemens | 34 Insydeh2o, Fas\/aff Bios, Ruggedcom Ape1808 and 31 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Kernel 5.x in Insyde InsydeH2O, affecting HddPassword. Software SMI services that use the Communicate() function of the EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL do not check whether the address of the buffer is valid, which allows use of SMRAM, MMIO, or OS kernel addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32952 | 2 Opendesign, Siemens | 4 Drawings Sdk, Comos, Jt2go and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| An out-of-bounds write issue exists in the DGN file-reading procedure in the Drawings SDK (Version 2022.4 and prior) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer and allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32950 | 2 Opendesign, Siemens | 4 Drawings Sdk, Comos, Jt2go and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 High |
| An out-of-bounds read issue exists within the parsing of DXF files in the Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer and allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or read sensitive information from memory locations. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32948 | 2 Opendesign, Siemens | 4 Drawings Sdk, Comos, Jt2go and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| An out-of-bounds write issue exists in the DWG file-reading procedure in the Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer and allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32946 | 2 Opendesign, Siemens | 4 Drawings Sdk, Comos, Jt2go and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| An improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions issue exists within the parsing DGN files from Drawings SDK (Version 2022.4 and prior) resulting from the lack of proper validation of the user-supplied data. This may result in several of out-of-bounds problems and allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32944 | 2 Opendesign, Siemens | 4 Drawings Sdk, Comos, Jt2go and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A use-after-free issue exists in the DGN file-reading procedure in the Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a memory corruption or arbitrary code execution, allowing attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32940 | 2 Opendesign, Siemens | 4 Drawings Sdk, Comos, Jt2go and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 High |
| An out-of-bounds read issue exists in the DWG file-recovering procedure in the Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.5) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer and allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or read sensitive information from memory locations. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32938 | 2 Opendesign, Siemens | 4 Drawings Sdk, Comos, Jt2go and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 High |
| Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) are vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read due to parsing of DWG files resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer and allows attackers to cause a denial-of service condition or read sensitive information from memory. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32936 | 2 Opendesign, Siemens | 4 Drawings Sdk, Comos, Jt2go and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| An out-of-bounds write issue exists in the DXF file-recovering procedure in the Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer and allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32804 | 4 Oracle, Redhat, Siemens and 1 more | 8 Graalvm, Acm, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| The npm package "tar" (aka node-tar) before versions 6.1.1, 5.0.6, 4.4.14, and 3.3.2 has a arbitrary File Creation/Overwrite vulnerability due to insufficient absolute path sanitization. node-tar aims to prevent extraction of absolute file paths by turning absolute paths into relative paths when the `preservePaths` flag is not set to `true`. This is achieved by stripping the absolute path root from any absolute file paths contained in a tar file. For example `/home/user/.bashrc` would turn into `home/user/.bashrc`. This logic was insufficient when file paths contained repeated path roots such as `////home/user/.bashrc`. `node-tar` would only strip a single path root from such paths. When given an absolute file path with repeating path roots, the resulting path (e.g. `///home/user/.bashrc`) would still resolve to an absolute path, thus allowing arbitrary file creation and overwrite. This issue was addressed in releases 3.2.2, 4.4.14, 5.0.6 and 6.1.1. Users may work around this vulnerability without upgrading by creating a custom `onentry` method which sanitizes the `entry.path` or a `filter` method which removes entries with absolute paths. See referenced GitHub Advisory for details. Be aware of CVE-2021-32803 which fixes a similar bug in later versions of tar. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32803 | 4 Oracle, Redhat, Siemens and 1 more | 8 Graalvm, Acm, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| The npm package "tar" (aka node-tar) before versions 6.1.2, 5.0.7, 4.4.15, and 3.2.3 has an arbitrary File Creation/Overwrite vulnerability via insufficient symlink protection. `node-tar` aims to guarantee that any file whose location would be modified by a symbolic link is not extracted. This is, in part, achieved by ensuring that extracted directories are not symlinks. Additionally, in order to prevent unnecessary `stat` calls to determine whether a given path is a directory, paths are cached when directories are created. This logic was insufficient when extracting tar files that contained both a directory and a symlink with the same name as the directory. This order of operations resulted in the directory being created and added to the `node-tar` directory cache. When a directory is present in the directory cache, subsequent calls to mkdir for that directory are skipped. However, this is also where `node-tar` checks for symlinks occur. By first creating a directory, and then replacing that directory with a symlink, it was thus possible to bypass `node-tar` symlink checks on directories, essentially allowing an untrusted tar file to symlink into an arbitrary location and subsequently extracting arbitrary files into that location, thus allowing arbitrary file creation and overwrite. This issue was addressed in releases 3.2.3, 4.4.15, 5.0.7 and 6.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31895 | 1 Siemens | 104 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I801, Ruggedcom I802 and 101 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS M2100 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS M2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS M969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC20 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC30 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC40 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC41 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RP110 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS400 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS401 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < 5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000A (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000H (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000T (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900GP (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS920L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS920W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS930L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS930W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS940G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900G V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900G V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900R (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSL910 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916P (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS i800 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i801 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i802 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i803 (All versions < V4.3.7). The DHCP client in affected devices fails to properly sanitize incoming DHCP packets. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause memory to be overwritten, potentially allowing remote code execution. | ||||