Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openshift Data Foundation
Subscriptions
Total
142 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-2880 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 20 Go, Acm, Ceph Storage and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Requests forwarded by ReverseProxy include the raw query parameters from the inbound request, including unparsable parameters rejected by net/http. This could permit query parameter smuggling when a Go proxy forwards a parameter with an unparsable value. After fix, ReverseProxy sanitizes the query parameters in the forwarded query when the outbound request's Form field is set after the ReverseProxy. Director function returns, indicating that the proxy has parsed the query parameters. Proxies which do not parse query parameters continue to forward the original query parameters unchanged. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2879 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 16 Go, Container Native Virtualization, Devtools and 13 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Reader.Read does not set a limit on the maximum size of file headers. A maliciously crafted archive could cause Read to allocate unbounded amounts of memory, potentially causing resource exhaustion or panics. After fix, Reader.Read limits the maximum size of header blocks to 1 MiB. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29810 | 2 Hashicorp, Redhat | 4 Go-getter, Acm, Openshift and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Hashicorp go-getter library before 1.5.11 does not redact an SSH key from a URL query parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29526 | 5 Fedoraproject, Golang, Linux and 2 more | 15 Fedora, Go, Linux Kernel and 12 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Go before 1.17.10 and 1.18.x before 1.18.2 has Incorrect Privilege Assignment. When called with a non-zero flags parameter, the Faccessat function could incorrectly report that a file is accessible. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28327 | 3 Fedoraproject, Golang, Redhat | 20 Extra Packages For Enterprise Linux, Fedora, Go and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The generic P-256 feature in crypto/elliptic in Go before 1.17.9 and 1.18.x before 1.18.1 allows a panic via long scalar input. | ||||
| CVE-2022-27664 | 3 Fedoraproject, Golang, Redhat | 19 Fedora, Go, Acm and 16 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| In net/http in Go before 1.18.6 and 1.19.x before 1.19.1, attackers can cause a denial of service because an HTTP/2 connection can hang during closing if shutdown were preempted by a fatal error. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24999 | 4 Debian, Openjsf, Qs Project and 1 more | 12 Debian Linux, Express, Qs and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| qs before 6.10.3, as used in Express before 4.17.3 and other products, allows attackers to cause a Node process hang for an Express application because an __ proto__ key can be used. In many typical Express use cases, an unauthenticated remote attacker can place the attack payload in the query string of the URL that is used to visit the application, such as a[__proto__]=b&a[__proto__]&a[length]=100000000. The fix was backported to qs 6.9.7, 6.8.3, 6.7.3, 6.6.1, 6.5.3, 6.4.1, 6.3.3, and 6.2.4 (and therefore Express 4.17.3, which has "deps: qs@6.9.7" in its release description, is not vulnerable). | ||||
| CVE-2022-24921 | 4 Debian, Golang, Netapp and 1 more | 11 Debian Linux, Go, Astra Trident and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| regexp.Compile in Go before 1.16.15 and 1.17.x before 1.17.8 allows stack exhaustion via a deeply nested expression. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24785 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Momentjs and 3 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Moment and 12 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Moment.js is a JavaScript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates. A path traversal vulnerability impacts npm (server) users of Moment.js between versions 1.0.1 and 2.29.1, especially if a user-provided locale string is directly used to switch moment locale. This problem is patched in 2.29.2, and the patch can be applied to all affected versions. As a workaround, sanitize the user-provided locale name before passing it to Moment.js. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24773 | 2 Digitalbazaar, Redhat | 5 Forge, Acm, Openshift Data Foundation and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code does not properly check `DigestInfo` for a proper ASN.1 structure. This can lead to successful verification with signatures that contain invalid structures but a valid digest. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24772 | 2 Digitalbazaar, Redhat | 6 Forge, Acm, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code does not check for tailing garbage bytes after decoding a `DigestInfo` ASN.1 structure. This can allow padding bytes to be removed and garbage data added to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24771 | 2 Digitalbazaar, Redhat | 6 Forge, Acm, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code is lenient in checking the digest algorithm structure. This can allow a crafted structure that steals padding bytes and uses unchecked portion of the PKCS#1 encoded message to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24675 | 4 Fedoraproject, Golang, Netapp and 1 more | 17 Fedora, Go, Kubernetes Monitoring Operator and 14 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| encoding/pem in Go before 1.17.9 and 1.18.x before 1.18.1 has a Decode stack overflow via a large amount of PEM data. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23806 | 4 Debian, Golang, Netapp and 1 more | 14 Debian Linux, Go, Beegfs Csi Driver and 11 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| Curve.IsOnCurve in crypto/elliptic in Go before 1.16.14 and 1.17.x before 1.17.7 can incorrectly return true in situations with a big.Int value that is not a valid field element. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23773 | 3 Golang, Netapp, Redhat | 12 Go, Beegfs Csi Driver, Cloud Insights Telegraf Agent and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| cmd/go in Go before 1.16.14 and 1.17.x before 1.17.7 can misinterpret branch names that falsely appear to be version tags. This can lead to incorrect access control if an actor is supposed to be able to create branches but not tags. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23772 | 4 Debian, Golang, Netapp and 1 more | 13 Debian Linux, Go, Beegfs Csi Driver and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Rat.SetString in math/big in Go before 1.16.14 and 1.17.x before 1.17.7 has an overflow that can lead to Uncontrolled Memory Consumption. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23541 | 2 Auth0, Redhat | 2 Jsonwebtoken, Openshift Data Foundation | 2024-11-21 | 5 Medium |
| jsonwebtoken is an implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Versions `<= 8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function referring to the `secretOrPublicKey` argument from the readme link will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification, other than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens. If your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function. This issue has been patched, please update to version 9.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23540 | 2 Auth0, Redhat | 2 Jsonwebtoken, Openshift Data Foundation | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 Medium |
| In versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library, lack of algorithm definition in the `jwt.verify()` function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the `none` algorithm for signature verification. Users are affected if you do not specify algorithms in the `jwt.verify()` function. This issue has been fixed, please update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the `jwt.verify()` method. There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the `none` algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in `jwt.verify()` options. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23539 | 2 Auth0, Redhat | 2 Jsonwebtoken, Openshift Data Foundation | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| Versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm. You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than a combination listed in the GitHub Security Advisory as unaffected. This issue has been fixed, please update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, if you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the `allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes` option to `true` in the `sign()` and/or `verify()` functions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21824 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 16 Debian Linux, Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 13 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| Due to the formatting logic of the "console.table()" function it was not safe to allow user controlled input to be passed to the "properties" parameter while simultaneously passing a plain object with at least one property as the first parameter, which could be "__proto__". The prototype pollution has very limited control, in that it only allows an empty string to be assigned to numerical keys of the object prototype.Node.js >= 12.22.9, >= 14.18.3, >= 16.13.2, and >= 17.3.1 use a null protoype for the object these properties are being assigned to. | ||||