| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The WebAdmin context for WebSphere Message Broker allows directory listings which could disclose sensitive information to the attacker. |
| IBM WebSphere Cast Iron Solution 7.0.0 and 7.5.0.0 is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) error when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose highly sensitive information or consume all available memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 119515. |
| Exphox WebRadar is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Security before 3.2.10, 4.1.x before 4.1.4, and 4.2.x before 4.2.1. Spring Security does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with an encoded "/" to a request, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. The unexpected presence of path parameters can cause a constraint to be bypassed. Users of Apache Tomcat (all current versions) are not affected by this vulnerability since Tomcat follows the guidance previously provided by the Servlet Expert group and strips path parameters from the value returned by getContextPath(), getServletPath(), and getPathInfo(). Users of other Servlet containers based on Apache Tomcat may or may not be affected depending on whether or not the handling of path parameters has been modified. Users of IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.x are known to be affected. Users of other containers that implement the Servlet specification may be affected. |
| The Administrative Console in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.x before 8.0.0.9 and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.2 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request. |
| IBM WebSphere Portal 8.0.0 before 8.0.0.1 CF13 and 8.5.0 through CF01 provides different error codes for firewall-traversal requests depending on whether the intranet host exists, which allows remote attackers to map the intranet network via a series of requests. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Business Process Manager (BPM) 7.5.x through 7.5.1.2, 8.0.x through 8.0.1.3, and 8.5.x through 8.5.6.0 and WebSphere Lombardi Edition (WLE) 7.2.x through 7.2.0.5 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) Liberty Profile 8.5.x before 8.5.5.2 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request. |
| The HTTP connection-management functionality in Internet Pass-Thru (IPT) before 2.1.0.2 in IBM WebSphere MQ, when HTTPS is disabled, does not properly generate MQIPT Session IDs, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions on MQ message data by predicting an ID value. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0.x before 7.0.0.33, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.9, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted SOAP response. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Portal 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.6 CF27, 6.1.5.0 through 6.1.5.3 CF27, 7.0.0 through 7.0.0.2 CF28, and 8.0.0 before 8.0.0.1 CF12 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Portal 6.1.0.x through 6.1.0.6 CF27, 6.1.5.x through 6.1.5.3 CF27, 7.x through 7.0.0.2 CF30, 8.0.0.x through 8.0.0.1 CF21, and 8.5.0 before CF10 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Eclipse Help System (IEHS) in IBM WebSphere Portal 6.1.0 through 6.1.0.6 CF27, 6.1.5 through 6.1.5.3 CF27, 7.0 through 7.0.0.2 CF27, and 8.0 before 8.0.0.1 CF06 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| IBM WebSphere Portal 6.1.0 through 6.1.0.6 CF27, 6.1.5 through 6.1.5.3 CF27, 7.0 through 7.0.0.2 CF28, and 8.0 before 8.0.0.1 CF12 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a login redirect. |
| The SNMP implementation in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 before 8.5.5.5 does not properly handle configuration data, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Portal 8.5.0 before CF05 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0.x before 7.0.0.33, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.9, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.2 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging incorrect request handling by the (1) Proxy or (2) ODR server. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the WCM (Web Content Manager) UI in IBM WebSphere Portal 6.1.0.x through 6.1.0.6 CF27, 6.1.5.x through 6.1.5.3 CF27, 7.0.0.x through 7.0.0.2 CF27, and 8.0.0.x before 8.0.0.1 CF11 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the Unified Task List (UTL) Portlet for IBM WebSphere Portal 7.x and 8.x through 8.0.0.1 CF12 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. |
| IBM WebSphere DataPower SOA appliances through 4.0.2.15, 5.x through 5.0.0.17, 6.0.0.x through 6.0.0.9, and 6.0.1.x through 6.0.1.5 make it easier for remote attackers to obtain a PreMasterSecret value and defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by sending a large number of requests in an SSL/TLS side-channel timing attack. |
