| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 8.15 through 12.2.1. Particular mathematical expressions in GitLab Markdown can exhaust client resources. |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 10.8 through 12.2.1. An internal endpoint unintentionally allowed group maintainers to view and edit group runner settings. |
| GitLab 11.8 and later contains a security vulnerability that allows a user to obtain details of restricted pipelines via the merge request endpoint. |
| GitLab 12.2.3 contains a security vulnerability that allows a user to affect the availability of the service through a Denial of Service attack in Issue Comments. |
| GitLab 12.2.2 and below contains a security vulnerability that allows a guest user in a private project to see the merge request ID associated to an issue via the activity timeline. |
| An improper access control vulnerability exists in GitLab <12.3.3 that allows an attacker to obtain container and dependency scanning reports through the merge request widget even though public pipelines were disabled. |
| An access control issue exists in < 12.3.5, < 12.2.8, and < 12.1.14 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) where private merge requests and issues would be disclosed with the Group Search feature provided by Elasticsearch integration |
| An improper access control vulnerability exists in Gitlab <v12.3.2, <v12.2.6, <v12.1.12 which would allow a blocked user would be able to use GIT clone and pull if he had obtained a CI/CD token before. |
| A XSS exists in Gitlab CE/EE < 12.1.10 in the Mermaid plugin. |
| Improper authentication exists in < 12.3.2, < 12.2.6, and < 12.1.12 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) in the GitLab SAML integration had a validation issue that permitted an attacker to takeover another user's account. |
| A denial of service exists in gitlab <v12.3.2, <v12.2.6, and <v12.1.10 that would let an attacker bypass input validation in markdown fields take down the affected page. |
| An information disclosure exists in < 12.3.2, < 12.2.6, and < 12.1.12 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE). When an issue was moved to a public project from a private one, the associated private labels and the private project namespace would be disclosed through the GitLab API. |
| An IDOR was discovered in < 12.3.2, < 12.2.6, and < 12.1.12 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) that allowed a maintainer to add any private group to a protected environment. |
| An IDOR exists in < 12.3.2, < 12.2.6, and < 12.1.12 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) that allowed a project owner or maintainer to see the members of any private group via merge request approval rules. |
| An information exposure vulnerability exists in gitlab.com <v12.3.2, <v12.2.6, and <v12.1.10 when using the blocking merge request feature, it was possible for an unauthenticated user to see the head pipeline data of a public project even though pipeline visibility was restricted. |
| An information disclosure exists in < 12.3.2, < 12.2.6, and < 12.1.12 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) where the assignee(s) of a confidential issue in a private project would be disclosed to a guest via milestones. |
| An information disclosure exists in < 12.3.2, < 12.2.6, and < 12.1.12 for GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE). The path of a private project, that used to be public, would be disclosed in the unsubscribe email link of issues and merge requests. |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in GitLab CE/EE <v12.3.2, <v12.2.6, and <v12.1.12 that allowed project milestones to be disclosed via groups browsing. |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in GitLab CE/EE <v12.3.2, <v12.2.6, and <v12.1.12 that allowed an attacker to view private system notes from a GraphQL endpoint. |
| A command injection exists in GitLab CE/EE <v12.3.2, <v12.2.6, and <v12.1.12 that allowed an attacker to inject commands via the API through the blobs scope. |
