| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Memory corruption in Kernel Mode Driver in Intel(R) Graphics Driver before 26.20.100.6813 (DCH) or 26.20.100.6812 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| In PHP imagick extension in versions between 3.3.0 and 3.4.4, writing to an array of values in ImagickKernel::fromMatrix() function did not check that the address will be within the allocated array. This could lead to out of bounds write to memory if the function is called with the data controlled by untrusted party. |
| In GraphicsMagick 1.4 snapshot-20190322 Q8, there is a heap-based buffer overflow in the function WriteXWDImage of coders/xwd.c, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted image file. |
| In GraphicsMagick 1.4 snapshot-20190322 Q8, there is a stack-based buffer overflow in the function SVGStartElement of coders/svg.c, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a quoted font family value. |
| The D-Link DCS series of Wi-Fi cameras contains a stack-based buffer overflow in alphapd, the camera's web server. The overflow allows a remotely authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by providing a long string in the WEPEncryption parameter when requesting wireless.htm. Vulnerable devices include DCS-5009L (1.08.11 and below), DCS-5010L (1.14.09 and below), DCS-5020L (1.15.12 and below), DCS-5025L (1.03.07 and below), DCS-5030L (1.04.10 and below), DCS-930L (2.16.01 and below), DCS-931L (1.14.11 and below), DCS-932L (2.17.01 and below), DCS-933L (1.14.11 and below), and DCS-934L (1.05.04 and below). |
| In WebAccess/SCADA, Versions 8.3.5 and prior, multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities are caused by a lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities may allow remote code execution. |
| In WebAccess/SCADA Versions 8.3.5 and prior, multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities are caused by a lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities may allow remote code execution. Note: A different vulnerability than CVE-2019-10991. |
| In WebAccess/SCADA Versions 8.3.5 and prior, multiple out-of-bounds write vulnerabilities are caused by a lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities may allow remote code execution. |
| Delta Electronics CNCSoft ScreenEditor, Versions 1.00.89 and prior. Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities may be exploited by processing specially crafted project files, allowing an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. There is a lack of user input validation before copying data from project files onto the heap. |
| NREL EnergyPlus, Versions 8.6.0 and possibly prior versions, The application fails to prevent an exception handler from being overwritten with arbitrary code. |
| In Emerson Ovation OCR400 Controller 3.3.1 and earlier, a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the embedded third-party FTP server involves improper handling of a long file name from the LIST command to the FTP service, which may cause the service to overwrite buffers, leading to remote code execution and escalation of privileges. |
| In Emerson Ovation OCR400 Controller 3.3.1 and earlier, a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the embedded third-party FTP server involves improper handling of a long command to the FTP service, which may cause memory corruption that halts the controller or leads to remote code execution and escalation of privileges. |
| In Advantech WebAccess HMI Designer Version 2.1.9.23 and prior, processing specially crafted MCR files lacking proper validation of user supplied data may cause the system to write outside the intended buffer area, allowing remote code execution. |
| An attacker could send crafted SMTP packets to cause a denial-of-service condition where the controller enters a major non-recoverable faulted state (MNRF) in CompactLogix 5370 L1, L2, and L3 Controllers, Compact GuardLogix 5370 controllers, and Armor Compact GuardLogix 5370 Controllers Versions 20 - 30 and earlier.
|
|
An attacker could send a crafted HTTP/HTTPS request to render the web server unavailable and/or lead to remote code execution caused by a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability. A cold restart is required for recovering
CompactLogix 5370 L1, L2, and L3 Controllers, Compact GuardLogix 5370 controllers, and Armor Compact GuardLogix 5370 Controllers Versions 20 - 30 and earlier.
|
| Delta Industrial Automation CNCSoft, CNCSoft ScreenEditor Version 1.00.88 and prior. Multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities may be exploited by processing specially crafted project files, allowing an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. There is a lack of user input validation before copying data from project files onto the heap. |
| Delta Industrial Automation CNCSoft, CNCSoft ScreenEditor Version 1.00.88 and prior. Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities may be exploited by processing specially crafted project files, allowing an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. This may occur because CNCSoft lacks user input validation before copying data from project files onto the stack. |
| pubRsaDecryptSignedElementExt in MatrixSSL 4.0.1 Open, as used in Inside Secure TLS Toolkit, has a stack-based buffer overflow during X.509 certificate verification because of missing validation in psRsaDecryptPubExt in crypto/pubkey/rsa_pub.c. |
| In Wireshark 2.4.0 to 2.4.13, 2.6.0 to 2.6.7, and 3.0.0, the DOF dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-dof.c by properly handling generated IID and OID bytes. |
| An issue was discovered in D-Link DIR-806 devices. There is a stack-based buffer overflow in function hnap_main at /htdocs/cgibin. The function will call sprintf without checking the length of strings in parameters given by HTTP header and can be controlled by users. And it finally leads to a stack-based buffer overflow via a special HTTP header. |
