Total
11804 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-1999-0001 | 3 Bsdi, Freebsd, Openbsd | 3 Bsd Os, Freebsd, Openbsd | 2024-08-01 | N/A |
| ip_input.c in BSD-derived TCP/IP implementations allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash or hang) via crafted packets. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7340 | 1 Weights \& Biases | 1 Weave | 2024-08-01 | 8.8 High |
| The Weave server API allows remote users to fetch files from a specific directory, but due to a lack of input validation, it is possible to traverse and leak arbitrary files remotely. In various common scenarios, this allows a low-privileged user to assume the role of the server admin. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25131 | 2024-06-03 | 8.8 High | ||
| A flaw was found in the MustGather.managed.openshift.io Custom Defined Resource (CRD) of OpenShift Dedicated. A non-privileged user on the cluster can create a MustGather object with a specially crafted file and set the most privileged service account to run the job. This can allow a standard developer user to escalate their privileges to a cluster administrator and pivot to the AWS environment. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50977 | 2024-05-28 | 7.5 High | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. See also CVE-2024-36472. | ||||
| CVE-2024-26821 | 2024-05-16 | 4.1 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-26827 | 2024-04-18 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-26628 | 2024-03-20 | 6.0 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2021-46946 | 2024-03-08 | 0.0 Low | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0793 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2024-02-07 | 7.7 High |
| A flaw was found in kube-controller-manager. This issue occurs when the initial application of a HPA config YAML lacking a .spec.behavior.scaleUp block causes a denial of service due to KCM pods going into restart churn. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2232 | 1 Redhat | 1 Red Hat Single Sign On | 2023-11-29 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the Keycloak package. This flaw allows an attacker to utilize an LDAP injection to bypass the username lookup or potentially perform other malicious actions. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3487 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-20 | 0.0 Low |
| Non Security Issue. See the binutils security policy for more details, https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-gdb/tree/binutils/SECURITY.txt | ||||
| CVE-2022-23529 | 2023-11-07 | 0.0 Low | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The issue is not a vulnerability. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44907 | 2023-11-07 | 0.0 Low | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2020-35539 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2020-24979 | 2023-11-07 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2020-14151 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-11813. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2018-11813. Notes: All CVE users should reference [ID] instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2019-15601 | 2023-11-07 | 3.3 Low | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2019-14561 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2018-3736 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-3739. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2018-3739. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-3739 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2017-17457 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-14246. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-14246. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-14246 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||