Total
1278 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-37208 | 2024-08-02 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Robert Macchi WP Scraper.This issue affects WP Scraper: from n/a through 5.7. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37164 | 2024-08-02 | 7.1 High | ||
| Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT) is an interactive video and image annotation tool for computer vision. CVAT allows users to supply custom endpoint URLs for cloud storages based on Amazon S3 and Azure Blob Storage. Starting in version 2.1.0 and prior to version 2.14.3, an attacker with a CVAT account can exploit this feature by specifying URLs whose host part is an intranet IP address or an internal domain name. By doing this, the attacker may be able to probe the network that the CVAT backend runs in for HTTP(S) servers. In addition, if there is a web server on this network that is sufficiently API-compatible with an Amazon S3 or Azure Blob Storage endpoint, and either allows anonymous access, or allows authentication with credentials that are known by the attacker, then the attacker may be able to create a cloud storage linked to this server. They may then be able to list files on the server; extract files from the server, if these files are of a type that CVAT supports reading from cloud storage (media data (such as images/videos/archives), importable annotations or datasets, task/project backups); and/or overwrite files on this server with exported annotations/datasets/backups. The exact capabilities of the attacker will depend on how the internal server is configured. Users should upgrade to CVAT 2.14.3 to receive a patch. In this release, the existing SSRF mitigation measures are applied to requests to cloud providers, with access to intranet IP addresses prohibited by default. Some workarounds are also available. One may use network security solutions such as virtual networks or firewalls to prohibit network access from the CVAT backend to unrelated servers on your internal network and/or require authentication for access to internal servers. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37098 | 2024-08-02 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes BlossomThemes Email Newsletter.This issue affects BlossomThemes Email Newsletter: from n/a through 2.2.6. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36414 | 1 Salesagility | 1 Suitecrm | 2024-08-02 | 7.7 High |
| SuiteCRM is an open-source Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to versions 7.14.4 and 8.6.1, a vulnerability in the connectors file verification allows for a server-side request forgery attack. Versions 7.14.4 and 8.6.1 contain a fix for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35633 | 2024-08-02 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in CreativeThemes Blocksy Companion.This issue affects Blocksy Companion: from n/a through 2.0.42. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35637 | 2024-08-02 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Church Admin.This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through 4.3.6. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35635 | 2024-08-02 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPManageNinja LLC Ninja Tables.This issue affects Ninja Tables: from n/a through 5.0.9. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35172 | 2024-08-02 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ShortPixel ShortPixel Adaptive Images.This issue affects ShortPixel Adaptive Images: from n/a through 3.8.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34581 | 2024-08-02 | 7.3 High | ||
| The W3C XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification, starting with 1.0, was originally published with a "RetrievalMethod is a URI ... that may be used to obtain key and/or certificate information" statement and no accompanying information about SSRF risks, and this may have contributed to vulnerable implementations such as those discussed in CVE-2023-36661 and CVE-2024-21893. NOTE: this was mitigated in 1.1 and 2.0 via a directly referenced Best Practices document that calls on implementers to be wary of SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34453 | 2024-08-02 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| TwoNav 2.1.13 contains an SSRF vulnerability via the url paramater to index.php?c=api&method=read_data&type=connectivity_test (which reaches /system/api.php). | ||||
| CVE-2024-34361 | 2024-08-02 | 8.6 High | ||
| Pi-hole is a DNS sinkhole that protects devices from unwanted content without installing any client-side software. A vulnerability in versions prior to 5.18.3 allows an authenticated user to make internal requests to the server via the `gravity_DownloadBlocklistFromUrl()` function. Depending on some circumstances, the vulnerability could lead to remote command execution. Version 5.18.3 contains a patch for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34351 | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High | ||
| Next.js is a React framework that can provide building blocks to create web applications. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in Next.js Server Actions. If the `Host` header is modified, and the below conditions are also met, an attacker may be able to make requests that appear to be originating from the Next.js application server itself. The required conditions are 1) Next.js is running in a self-hosted manner; 2) the Next.js application makes use of Server Actions; and 3) the Server Action performs a redirect to a relative path which starts with a `/`. This vulnerability was fixed in Next.js `14.1.1`. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33857 | 2024-08-02 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.4.0. Due to a lack of input validation on URLs in threat intelligence, an attacker with low-level access to the system can trigger Server Side Request Forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33864 | 2024-08-02 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| An issue was discovered in linqi before 1.4.0.1 on Windows. There is SSRF via Document template generation; i.e., via remote images in process creation, file inclusion, and PDF document generation via malicious JavaScript. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33832 | 2024-08-02 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| OneNav v0.9.35-20240318 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /index.php?c=api&method=get_link_info. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33634 | 1 Piotnet | 1 Piotnet Forms | 2024-08-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Piotnet Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro.This issue affects Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro: from n/a through 7.1.17. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33592 | 2024-08-02 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Radio Player.This issue affects Radio Player: from n/a through 2.0.73. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33590 | 2024-08-02 | 5 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in codeSavory Knowledge Base documentation & wiki plugin – BasePress.This issue affects Knowledge Base documentation & wiki plugin – BasePress: from n/a through 2.16.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33627 | 2024-08-02 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Cusmin Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin.This issue affects Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin: from n/a through 7.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33629 | 2024-08-02 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Creative Motion Auto Featured Image (Auto Post Thumbnail).This issue affects Auto Featured Image (Auto Post Thumbnail): from n/a through 4.0.0. | ||||