| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Illia Cloud illia-Builder before v4.8.5 allows authenticated users to send arbitrary requests to internal services via the API. An attacker can leverage this to enumerate open ports based on response discrepancies and interact with internal services. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the URL processing functionality of PHProxy version 1.1.1 and prior. The input validation for the _proxurl parameter can be bypassed, allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to submit a specially crafted URL |
| An issue was discovered in Teledyne FLIR M300 2.00-19. Unauthenticated remote code execution can occur in the web server. An attacker can exploit this by sending a POST request to the vulnerable PHP page. An attacker can elevate to root permissions with Sudo. |
| Manager-io/Manager is accounting software. A critical unauthenticated full read Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the proxy handler component of both manager Desktop and Server edition versions up to and including 25.7.18.2519. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass network isolation and access restrictions, potentially enabling access to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and exfiltration of sensitive data from isolated network segments. This vulnerability is fixed in version 25.7.21.2525. |
| The Auto Featured Image (Auto Post Thumbnail) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.1.7 via the upload_to_library AJAX action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| TwoNav 2.1.13 contains an SSRF vulnerability via the url paramater to index.php?c=api&method=read_data&type=connectivity_test (which reaches /system/api.php). |
| The WP Crontrol plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to blind Server-Side Request Forgery in versions 1.17.0 to 1.19.1 via the 'wp_remote_request' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| The Code Embed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5 via the ce_get_file() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| An unauthenticated attacker may perform a limited server side request forgery (SSRF), forcing the target device to open a TCP connection to an arbitrary port number on an arbitrary IP address. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing ReplyTo element in a Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) SOAP request. The attacker can not control the data sent in the SSRF connection, nor can the attacker receive any data back. This SSRF is suitable for TCP port scanning of an internal network when the Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) is exposed across a network segment. |
| Sensitive information disclosure due to SSRF. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Windows, Linux) before build 39938. |
| Firecrawl turns entire websites into LLM-ready markdown or structured data. Prior to version 2.0.1, a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in Firecrawl's webhook functionality. Authenticated users could configure a webhook to an internal URL and send POST requests with arbitrary headers, which may have allowed access to internal systems. This has been fixed in version 2.0.1. If upgrading is not possible, it is recommend to isolate Firecrawl from any sensitive internal systems. |
| The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 017700000001 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. |
| A
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause unauthenticated remote
code execution when the server is accessed via the network with knowledge of hidden URLs and manipulation
of host request header. |
| Icinga Reporting is the central component for reporting related functionality in the monitoring web frontend and framework Icinga Web 2. A vulnerability present in versions 0.10.0 through 1.0.2 allows to set up a template that allows to embed arbitrary Javascript. This enables the attacker to act on behalf of the user, if the template is being previewed; and act on behalf of the headless browser, if a report using the template is printed to PDF. This issue has been resolved in version 1.0.3 of Icinga Reporting. As a workaround, review all templates and remove suspicious settings. |
| PowSyBl (Power System Blocks) is a framework to build power system oriented software. Prior to version 6.7.2, in certain places, powsybl-core XML parsing is vulnerable to an XML external entity (XXE) attack and to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. This allows an attacker to elevate their privileges to read files that they do not have permissions to, including sensitive files on the system. The vulnerable class is com.powsybl.commons.xml.XmlReader which is considered to be untrusted in use cases where untrusted users can submit their XML to the vulnerable methods. This can be a multi-tenant application that hosts many different users perhaps with different privilege levels. This issue has been patched in com.powsybl:powsybl-commons: 6.7.2. |
| Adobe Document Service allows an attacker with administrator privileges to send a crafted request from a vulnerable web application. It is usually used to target internal systems behind firewalls that are normally inaccessible to an attacker from the external network, resulting in a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. On successful exploitation, the attacker can read or modify any file and/or make the entire system unavailable. |
| CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) |
| Cost Calculator Builder Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to 3.1.72, via the send_demo_webhook() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in the videx-legacy-ssl web service of Videx’s CyberAudit-Web, affecting versions prior to 1.1.3. This vulnerability has been patched in versions after 1.1.3. Leaving this vulnerability unpatched could lead to unauthorized access to the underlying infrastructure. |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Stoque Zeev.it 4.24. This affects an unknown part of the file /Login?inpLostSession=1 of the component Login Page. The manipulation of the argument inpRedirectURL leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
