Search
Search Results (395035 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-39129 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Heap Buffer Overflow vulnerability in DumpTS v0.1.0-nightly allows attackers to cause a denial of service via the function PushTSBuf() at /src/PayloadBuf.cpp. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42939 | 1 Sap | 2 S/4hana, S4hana | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| SAP S/4HANA (Manage Processing Rules - For Bank Statements) allows an authenticated attacker with basic privileges to delete conditions from any shared rule of any user by tampering the request parameter. Due to missing authorization check, the attacker can delete shared rule conditions that should be restricted, compromising the integrity of the application without affecting its confidentiality or availability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3912 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Certain models of ASUS routers have an arbitrary firmware upload vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary system commands on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54909 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in GoldPanKit eva-server v4.1.0. It affects the path parameter of the /api/resource/local/download endpoint, where manipulation of this parameter can lead to arbitrary file download. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23983 | 1 Pingidentity | 1 Pingaccess | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper handling of canonical URL-encoding may lead to bypass not properly constrained by request rules. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39069 | 1 Ifood | 1 Order Manager | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| An issue in ifood Order Manager v3.35.5 'Gestor de Peddios.exe' allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a DLL hijacking attack. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42909 | 1 Sap | 1 Cloud Appliance Library Appliances | 2026-04-15 | 3 Low |
| SAP Cloud Appliance Library Appliances allows an attacker with high privileges to leverage an insecure S/4HANA default profile setting in an existing SAP CAL appliances to gain access to other appliances. This has low impact on confidentiality of the application, integrity and availability is not impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42908 | 1 Sap | 1 Netweaver Application Server For Abap | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Due to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP, an authenticated attacker could initiate transactions directly via the session manager, bypassing the first transaction screen and the associated authorization check. This vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform actions and execute transactions that would normally require specific permissions, compromising the integrity and confidentiality of the system by enabling unauthorized access to restricted functionality. There is no impact to availability from this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23980 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Improper buffer restrictions in PlatformPfrDxe driver in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Server D50FCP Family products may allow a privileged user to enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42906 | 1 Sap | 1 Commerce Cloud | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| SAP Commerce Cloud contains a path traversal vulnerability that may allow users to access web applications such as the Administration Console from addresses where the Administration Console is not explicitly deployed. This could potentially bypass configured access restrictions, resulting in a low impact on confidentiality, with no impact on the integrity or availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42902 | 1 Sap | 5 Abap Platform, As Abap, Netweaver and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Due to the memory corruption vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform, an unauthenticated attacker can send a corrupted SAP Logon Ticket or SAP Assertion Ticket to the SAP application server. This leads to a dereference of NULL which makes the work process crash. As a result, it has a low impact on the availability but no impact on the confidentiality and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36407 | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform VP9500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F1500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5500, 5100H, 5500H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5200, 5600, 5200H, 5600H, Hitachi Unified Storage VM, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G100, G200, G400, G600, G800, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F400, F600, F800, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H allows local users to gain sensitive information.This issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform: before DKCMAIN Ver. 70-06-74-00/00, SVP Ver. 70-06-58/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform VP9500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 70-06-74-00/00, SVP Ver. 70-06-58/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-92-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-87/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F1500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-92-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-87/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5500,5100H, 5500H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-81-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-81/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-62-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-62/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-43-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-43/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5200, 5600,5200H, 5600H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-81-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-81/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-62-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-62/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-43-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-43/00; Hitachi Unified Storage VM: before DKCMAIN Ver. 73-03-75-X0/00, SVP Ver. 73-03-74/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 73(75)-03-75-X0/00, SVP Ver. 73(75)-03-74/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G100, G200, G400, G600, G800: before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-06-19-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-06-20-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-05-47-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-05-51-X0/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F400, F600, F800: before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-06-19-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-06-20-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-05-47-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-05-51-X0/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900: before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-09-XX/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-11-X0/02; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F350, F370, F700, F900: before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-09-XX/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-11-X0/02; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-81-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-81-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-62-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-62-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-43-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-43-X0/00. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4229 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Pan-os | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in the SD-WAN feature of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software enables an unauthorized user to view unencrypted data sent from the firewall through the SD-WAN interface. This requires the user to be able to intercept packets sent from the firewall. Cloud NGFW and Prisma® Access are not affected by this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45980 | 1 Meanstore | 1 Meanstore | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A host header injection vulnerability in MEANStore 1.0 allows attackers to obtain the password reset token via user interaction with a crafted password reset link. This allows attackers to arbitrarily reset other users' passwords and compromise their accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50340 | 1 Sogo | 1 Webmail | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability was discovered in SOGo Webmail thru 5.6.0, allowing an authenticated user to send emails on behalf of other users by manipulating a user-controlled identifier in the email-sending request. The server fails to verify whether the authenticated user is authorized to use the specified sender identity, resulting in unauthorized message delivery as another user. This can lead to impersonation, phishing, or unauthorized communication within the system. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the only effective way to prevent this sender spoofing is on the SMTP server, not within a client such as SOGo. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34165 | 1 Intel | 1 Oneapi Dpc\+\+\/c\+\+ Compiler | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| Uncontrolled search path in some Intel(R) oneAPI DPC++/C++ Compiler before version 2024.2 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41718 | 1 Murrelektronik | 4 Firmware Impact67 Pro 54620, Firmware Impact67 Pro 54630, Firmware Impact67 Pro 54631 and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability in the affected products allows an unauthorized remote attacker to gain login credentials and access the Web-UI. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49521 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in the EDA component of the Ansible Automation Platform, where user-supplied Git branch or refspec values are evaluated as Jinja2 templates. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to inject expressions that execute commands or access sensitive files on the EDA worker. In OpenShift, it can lead to service account token theft. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49520 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Automation Platform’s EDA component where user-supplied Git URLs are passed unsanitized to the git ls-remote command. This vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to inject arguments and execute arbitrary commands on the EDA worker. In Kubernetes/OpenShift environments, this can lead to service account token theft and cluster access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41707 | 1 Phoenix Contact | 4 Quint4-ups/24dc/24dc/10/eip, Quint4-ups/24dc/24dc/20/eip, Quint4-ups/24dc/24dc/40/eip and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The websocket handler is vulnerable to a denial of service condition. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted websocket message to trigger the issue without affecting the core functionality. | ||||