| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple memory corruption issues were addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.2, tvOS 12.2, Safari 12.1, iTunes 12.9.4 for Windows, iCloud for Windows 7.11. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| Multiple memory corruption issues were addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.2, tvOS 12.2, watchOS 5.2, Safari 12.1, iTunes 12.9.4 for Windows, iCloud for Windows 7.11. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.2, tvOS 12.2, Safari 12.1, iTunes 12.9.4 for Windows, iCloud for Windows 7.11. A malicious website may be able to execute scripts in the context of another website. |
| The /plugins/servlet/gadgets/makeRequest resource in Jira before version 8.4.0 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability due to a logic bug in the JiraWhitelist class. |
| An issue was discovered in Jinja2 2.10. The from_string function is prone to Server Side Template Injection (SSTI) where it takes the "source" parameter as a template object, renders it, and then returns it. The attacker can exploit it with {{INJECTION COMMANDS}} in a URI. NOTE: The maintainer and multiple third parties believe that this vulnerability isn't valid because users shouldn't use untrusted templates without sandboxing |
| An issue was discovered in RubyGems 2.6 and later through 3.0.2. A crafted gem with a multi-line name is not handled correctly. Therefore, an attacker could inject arbitrary code to the stub line of gemspec, which is eval-ed by code in ensure_loadable_spec during the preinstall check. |
| An XPath entity injection vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An attacker can craft a GET request to page cache block rendering module that gets passed to XML data processing engine without validation. The crafted key/value GET request data allows an attacker to limited access to underlying XML data. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to modify store configurations can manipulate the connector api endpoint to enable remote code execution. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shippment settings can execute arbitrary code through server-side request forgery due to unsafe handling of a carrier gateway. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can be exploited by authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shipment settings to execute arbitrary code. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can be exploited by an authenticated user with admin privileges to manipulate shipment methods to execute arbitrary code. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Magento Open Source prior to 1.9.4.2, and Magento Commerce prior to 1.14.4.2, Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can be exploited by an authenticated user with access to the admin panel to manipulate system configuration and execute arbitrary code. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. An authenticated user with administrator privileges to access shipment settings can execute arbitrary code via server-side request forgery. |
| A security bypass exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2 that could be abused to execute arbitrary PHP code. An authenticated user can bypass security protections that prevent arbitrary PHP script upload via form data injection. |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.3. The phar:// stream wrapper can be used for objection injection attacks because there is no protection mechanism (such as the TYPO3 PHAR stream wrapper) to prevent use of the phar:// handler for non .phar-files. |
| taocms through 2014-05-24 allows eval injection by placing PHP code in the install.php db_name parameter and then making a config.php request. |
| Nibbleblog 4.0.5 allows eval injection by placing PHP code in the install.php username parameter and then making a content/private/shadow.php request. |
| install/install.php in CIM 0.9.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a crafted prefix value because of configuration file mishandling in the N=83 case, as demonstrated by a call to the PHP fputs function that creates a .php file in the public folder. |
| TheHive Project UnshortenLink analyzer before 1.1, included in Cortex-Analyzers before 1.15.2, has SSRF. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker must create a new analysis, select URL for Data Type, and provide an SSRF payload like "http://127.0.0.1:22" in the Data parameter. The result can be seen in the main dashboard. Thus, it is possible to do port scans on localhost and intranet hosts. |
| global.encryptPassword in bootstrap/global.js in CMSWing 1.3.7 relies on multiple MD5 operations for password hashing. |
