| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Booster for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 6.0.1, Booster Plus for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 6.0.1, Booster Elite for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 6.0.1 have either flawed CSRF checks or are missing them completely in numerous places, allowing attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks |
| SoftPerfect NetWorx 7.1.1 on Windows allows an attacker to execute a malicious binary with potentially higher privileges via a low-privileged user account that abuses the Notifications function. The Notifications function allows for arbitrary binary execution and can be modified by any user. The resulting binary execution will occur in the context of any user running NetWorx. If an attacker modifies the Notifications function to execute a malicious binary, the binary will be executed by every user running NetWorx on that system. |
| A vulnerability in Sengled Smart bulb 0x0000024 allows attackers to arbitrarily perform a factory reset on the device via a crafted IEEE 802.15.4 frame. |
| MCMS v5.2.10 and below was discovered to contain an arbitrary file write vulnerability via the component ms/template/writeFileContent.do. |
| Insufficiently Protected Credentials in the AD/LDAP server settings in 1C-Bitrix Bitrix24 through 22.200.200 allow remote administrators to discover an AD/LDAP administrative password by reading the source code of /bitrix/admin/ldap_server_edit.php. |
| The Sinilink XY-WFT1 WiFi Remote Thermostat, running firmware 1.3.6, allows an attacker to bypass the intended requirement to communicate using MQTT. It is possible to replay Sinilink aka SINILINK521 protocol (udp/1024) commands interfacing directly with the target device. This, in turn, allows for an attack to control the onboard relay without requiring authentication via the mobile application. This might result in an unacceptable temperature within the target device's physical environment. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ReQlogic v11.3 allow attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the POBatch and WaitDuration parameters. |
| A program using FoundationNetworking in swift-corelibs-foundation is potentially vulnerable to CRLF ( ) injection in URLRequest headers. In this vulnerability, a client can insert one or several CRLF sequences into a URLRequest header value. When that request is sent via URLSession to an HTTP server, the server may interpret the content after the CRLF as extra headers, or even a second request. For example, consider a URLRequest to http://example.com/ with the GET method. Suppose we set the URLRequest header "Foo" to the value "Bar Extra-Header: Added GET /other HTTP/1.1". When this request is sent, it will appear to the server as two requests: GET / HTTP/1.1 Foo: Bar Extra-Header: Added GET /other HTTP/1.1 In this manner, the client is able to inject extra headers and craft an entirely new request to a separate path, despite only making one API call in URLSession. If a developer has total control over the request and its headers, this vulnerability may not pose a threat. However, this vulnerability escalates if un-sanitized user input is placed in header values. If so, a malicious user could inject new headers or requests to an intermediary or backend server. Developers should be especially careful to sanitize user input in this case, or upgrade their version of swift-corelibs-foundation to include the patch below. |
| The EU Cookie Law for GDPR/CCPA WordPress plugin through 3.1.6 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup). |
| The Analyticator WordPress plugin before 6.5.6 unserializes user input provided via the settings, which could allow high-privilege users such as admin to perform PHP Object Injection when a suitable gadget is present. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the management portal of JetNexus/EdgeNexus ADC 4.2.8 allows attackers to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. |
| The management portal component of JetNexus/EdgeNexus ADC 4.2.8 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability. This vulnerability allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands through a specially crafted payload. This vulnerability can also be exploited from an unauthenticated context via unspecified vectors |
| In many functions of AutomaticZenRule.java, there is a possible failure to persist permissions settings due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-242703460 |
| In pinReplyNative of com_android_bluetooth_btservice_AdapterService.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege of BLE with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-228602963 |
| In ApplicationsDetailsActivity of AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible DoS due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12Android ID: A-183410508 |
| ONLYOFFICE all versions as of 2021-11-08 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The document editor service can be abused to read and serve arbitrary URLs as a document. |
| ONLYOFFICE all versions as of 2021-11-08 is vulnerable to Improper Input Validation. A lack of input validation can allow an attacker to spoof the names of users who interact with a document, if the document id is known. |
| ONLYOFFICE all versions as of 2021-11-08 is affected by Incorrect Access Control. An authentication bypass in the document editor allows attackers to edit documents without authentication. |
| ONLYOFFICE all versions as of 2021-11-08 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The "macros" feature of the document editor allows malicious cross site scripting payloads to be used. |
| ONLYOFFICE all versions as of 2021-11-08 is affected by Incorrect Access Control. An attacker can authenticate with the web socket service of the ONLYOFFICE document editor which is protected by JWT auth by using a default JWT signing key. |
