Search Results (2542 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-13081 1 Drupal 2 Drupal, Drupal Core 2025-11-24 5.9 Medium
Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Object Injection.This issue affects Drupal core: from 8.0.0 before 10.4.9, from 10.5.0 before 10.5.6, from 11.0.0 before 11.1.9, from 11.2.0 before 11.2.8.
CVE-2025-13147 1 Progress 1 Moveit Transfer 2025-11-24 5.3 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Progress MOVEit Transfer.This issue affects MOVEit Transfer: before 2024.1.8, from 2025.0.0 before 2025.0.4.
CVE-2025-12735 1 Expr-eval Project 1 Expr-eval 2025-11-22 9.8 Critical
The expr-eval library is a JavaScript expression parser and evaluator designed to safely evaluate mathematical expressions with user-defined variables. However, due to insufficient input validation, an attacker can pass a crafted context object or use MEMBER of the context object into the evaluate() function and trigger arbitrary code execution.
CVE-2025-64327 2 Matiasdesuu, Thinkdashboard Project 2 Thinkdashboard, Thinkdashboard 2025-11-21 5.3 Medium
ThinkDashboard is a self-hosted bookmark dashboard built with Go and vanilla JavaScript. Versions 0.6.7 and below contain a Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, in its `/api/ping?url= endpoint`. This allows an attacker to make arbitrary requests to internal or external hosts. This can include discovering ports open on the local machine, hosts on the local network, and ports open on the hosts on the internal network. This issue is fixed in version 0.6.8.
CVE-2025-5350 1 Wso2 10 Api Control Plane, Api Manager, Carbon and 7 more 2025-11-21 5.9 Medium
SSRF and Reflected XSS Vulnerabilities exist in multiple WSO2 products within the deprecated Try-It feature, which was accessible only to administrative users. This feature accepted user-supplied URLs without proper validation, leading to server-side request forgery (SSRF). Additionally, the retrieved content was directly reflected in the HTTP response, enabling reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) in the admin user's browser context. By tricking an administrator into accessing a crafted link, an attacker could force the server to fetch malicious content and reflect it into the admin’s browser, leading to arbitrary JavaScript execution for UI manipulation or data exfiltration. While session cookies are protected with the HttpOnly flag, the XSS still poses a significant security risk. Furthermore, SSRF can be used by a privileged user to query internal services, potentially aiding in internal network enumeration if the target endpoints are reachable from the affected product.
CVE-2025-34021 2025-11-20 N/A
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR camera models, including iZero, Targa 512, Targa 504, Targa Semplice, Targa 704 TKM, Targa 805, Targa 710 INOX, Targa 750, and Targa 704 ILB. The application fails to validate user-supplied input in JSON POST parameters such as ipnotify_address and url, which are used by internal mechanisms to perform image fetch and DNS lookups. This allows remote unauthenticated attackers to induce the system to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external systems, potentially bypassing firewall policies or conducting internal service enumeration. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-01-25 UTC.
CVE-2023-6270 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Linux and 1 more 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Linux Kernel and 1 more 2025-11-20 7 High
A flaw was found in the ATA over Ethernet (AoE) driver in the Linux kernel. The aoecmd_cfg_pkts() function improperly updates the refcnt on `struct net_device`, and a use-after-free can be triggered by racing between the free on the struct and the access through the `skbtxq` global queue. This could lead to a denial of service condition or potential code execution.
CVE-2025-54560 1 Desktopalert 2 Pingalert, Pingalert Application Server 2025-11-20 3.8 Low
A Server-side Request Forgery vulnerability was found in the Application Server of Desktop Alert PingAlert version 6.1.0.11 to 6.1.1.2 which allows Probing of internal infrastructure.
CVE-2025-12359 2 Dfactory, Wordpress 2 Responsive Lightbox & Gallery, Wordpress 2025-11-20 5.4 Medium
The Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.3 via the 'get_image_size_by_url' function. This is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs when determining image dimensions for gallery items. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
CVE-2025-8084 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-11-20 6.8 Medium
The AI Engine plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.8 via the rest_helpers_create_images function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Editor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. On Cloud instances, this issue allows for metadata retrieving.
CVE-2025-12376 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-11-20 6.4 Medium
The Icon List Block – Add Icon-Based Lists with Custom Styles plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1 via the fs_api_request function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. Only valid JSON objects are rendered in the response.
CVE-2024-3183 1 Redhat 9 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Aus, Enterprise Linux Eus and 6 more 2025-11-20 8.1 High
A vulnerability was found in FreeIPA in a way when a Kerberos TGS-REQ is encrypted using the client’s session key. This key is different for each new session, which protects it from brute force attacks. However, the ticket it contains is encrypted using the target principal key directly. For user principals, this key is a hash of a public per-principal randomly-generated salt and the user’s password. If a principal is compromised it means the attacker would be able to retrieve tickets encrypted to any principal, all of them being encrypted by their own key directly. By taking these tickets and salts offline, the attacker could run brute force attacks to find character strings able to decrypt tickets when combined to a principal salt (i.e. find the principal’s password).
CVE-2011-10018 1 Mybb 1 Mybb 2025-11-20 9.8 Critical
myBB version 1.6.4 was distributed with an unauthorized backdoor embedded in the source code. The backdoor allowed remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code by injecting payloads into a specially crafted collapsed cookie. This vulnerability was introduced during packaging and was not part of the intended application logic. Exploitation requires no authentication and results in full compromise of the web server under the context of the web application.
CVE-2010-20103 2 Proftpd, Proftpd Project 2 Proftpd, Proftpd 2025-11-20 9.8 Critical
A malicious backdoor was embedded in the official ProFTPD 1.3.3c source tarball distributed between November 28 and December 2, 2010. The backdoor implements a hidden FTP command trigger that, when invoked, causes the server to execute arbitrary shell commands with root privileges. This allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to run any OS command on the FTP server host.
CVE-2025-0474 1 Invoiceninja 1 Invoice Ninja 2025-11-19 7.7 High
Invoice Ninja is vulnerable to authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) allowing for arbitrary file read and network resource requests as the application user. This issue affects Invoice Ninja: from 5.8.56 through 5.11.23.
CVE-2025-34117 1 Netis-systems 1 Netcore Router Firmware 2025-11-19 N/A
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in multiple Netcore and Netis routers models with firmware released prior to August 2014 due to the presence of an undocumented backdoor listener on UDP port 53413. Exact version boundaries remain undocumented. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted UDP packets to execute arbitrary commands on the affected device. This backdoor uses a hardcoded authentication mechanism and accepts shell commands post-authentication. Some device models include a non-standard implementation of the `echo` command, which may affect exploitability.
CVE-2024-45783 1 Redhat 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift 2025-11-19 4.4 Medium
A flaw was found in grub2. When failing to mount an HFS+ grub, the hfsplus filesystem driver doesn't properly set an ERRNO value. This issue may lead to a NULL pointer access.
CVE-2025-11427 2 Wordpress, Wpengine 2 Wordpress, Wp Migrate 2025-11-19 5.8 Medium
The WP Migrate Lite – WordPress Migration Made Easy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.6 via the wpmdb_flush AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to obtain information about internal services.
CVE-2025-34282 1 Thingsboard 1 Thingsboard 2025-11-19 9.1 Critical
ThingsBoard versions < 4.2.1 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the dashboard's Image Upload Gallery feature. An attacker can upload a malicious SVG file that references a remote URL. If the server processes the SVG file in a way that parses external references, it may initiate unintended outbound requests. This can be used to access internal services or resources.
CVE-2025-12962 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-11-18 6.4 Medium
The Local Syndication plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5a via the `url` parameter in the `[syndicate_local]` shortcode. This is due to the use of `wp_remote_get()` instead of `wp_safe_remote_get()` which lacks protections against requests to internal/private IP addresses and localhost. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application, which can be used to query and modify information from internal services, scan internal networks, and access resources that should not be accessible from external networks.