| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Lack of application manifest sanitation could lead to potential stored XSS.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5. |
| Outdated and Vulnerable UI Dependencies might potentially lead to exploitation.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5. |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Azure Access Technology BLU-IC2, Azure Access Technology BLU-IC4 allows Flooding.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5. |
| Incorrect Content-Type header in one of the APIs (`text/html` instead of `application/json`) replies may potentially allow injection of HTML/JavaScript into reply.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5. |
| Vulnerable Upgrade Feature (Arbitrary File Write) may lead to obtaining super user permissions on board.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5. |
| Protocol manipulation might lead to denial of service.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5 . |
| Privilege Escalation through SUID-bit Binary.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5 . |
| Local Privilege Escalation.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5 . |
| Resource Lacking AuthN.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5 . |
| Server Version Disclosure.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5 . |
| Non-Compliant TLS Configuration.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5 . |
| Systemic Lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Token Implementation.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5 . |
| Mail Configuration File Manipulation + Command Execution.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5. |
| WebITR developed by Uniong has a Missing Authentication vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to log into the system as arbitrary users by exploiting a specific functionality. |
| An attacker of Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted installations that route traffic from Secrets Manager to AWS through a misconfigured network device can reroute authentication requests to a malicious server under the attacker’s control. CyberArk believes there to be very few installations where this issue can be actively exploited, though Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise) prior to versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 and Conjur OSS prior to version 1.22.1 may be affected. Conjur OSS version 1.22.1 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 fix the issue. |
| Conjur provides secrets management and application identity for infrastructure. Conjur OSS versions 1.19.5 through 1.22.0 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly known as Conjur Enterprise) 13.1 through 13.5 and 13.6 are vulnerable to bypass of the IAM authenticator. An attacker who can manipulate the headers signed by AWS can take advantage of a malformed regular expression to redirect the authentication validation request that Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted sends to AWS to a malicious server controlled by the attacker. This redirection could result in a bypass of the Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted IAM Authenticator, granting the attacker the permissions granted to the client whose request was manipulated. This issue affects both Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise) and Conjur OSS. Conjur OSS version 1.22.1 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 fix the issue. |
| An encryption vulnerability exists in all versions prior to V15.00.001 of Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk® AssetCentre. The vulnerability exists due to a weak encryption methodology and could allow a threat actor to extract passwords belonging to other users of the application. |
| The password recovery mechanism for the forgotten password in Riello Netman 204 allows an attacker to reset the admin password and take over control of the device.This issue affects Netman 204: through 4.05. |
| An SQL injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Expedition allows an unauthenticated attacker to reveal Expedition database contents, such as password hashes, usernames, device configurations, and device API keys. With this, attackers can also create and read arbitrary files on the Expedition system. |
| An OS command injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Expedition allows an unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary OS commands as root in Expedition, resulting in disclosure of usernames, cleartext passwords, device configurations, and device API keys of PAN-OS firewalls. |
