| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The HTML5 Audio Player – The Ultimate No-Code Podcast, MP3 & Audio Player plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions from 2.4.0 up to, and including, 2.5.1 via the getIcyMetadata() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| Under certain conditions, an SSRF vulnerability in SAP CRM and SAP S/4HANA (Interaction Center) allows an attacker with low privileges to access restricted information. This flaw enables the attacker to send requests to internal network resources, thereby compromising the application's confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity or availability |
| OneNav v0.9.35-20240318 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /index.php?c=api&method=get_link_info. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the endpoint http://{your-server}/url-to-pdf of Stirling-PDF 0.35.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information via a crafted request. |
| hopetree izone lts c011b48 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the active push function as \\apps\\tool\\apis\\bd_push.py does not securely filter user input through push_urls() and get_urls(). |
| Gomatrixserverlib is a Go library for matrix federation. Gomatrixserverlib is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, serving content from a private network it can access, under certain conditions. The commit `c4f1e01` fixes this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should use a local firewall to limit the network segments and hosts the service using gomatrixserverlib can access. |
| Akamai CloudTest before 60 2025.06.09 (12989) allows SSRF. |
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in FileMegane versions above 3.0.0.0 prior to 3.4.0.0. Executing arbitrary backend Web API requests could potentially lead to rebooting the services. |
| A vulnerability was found in kasuganosoras Pigeon 1.0.177. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /pigeon/imgproxy/index.php. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 1.0.181 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as 84cea5fe73141689da2e7ec8676d47435bd6423e. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. |
| BigFix Patch Download Plug-ins are affected by Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. It may allow the application to download files from an internally hosted server on localhost. |
| Oxide control plane software before 5 allows SSRF. |
| An issue in Senayan Library Management System (SLiMS) 9 Bulian v.9.6.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the scrap_image.php component and the imageURL parameter |
| A flaw was found in` JwtValidator.resolvePublicKey` in JBoss EAP, where the validator checks jku and sends a HTTP request. During this process, no whitelisting or other filtering behavior is performed on the destination URL address, which may result in a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| KUNO CMS is a fully deployable full-stack blog application. In versions prior to 1.3.15, an SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) vulnerability exists in the Media module of the Kuno CMS administrative panel. A logged-in administrator can upload a specially crafted SVG file containing an external image reference, causing the server to initiate an outgoing connection to an arbitrary external URL. This can lead to information disclosure or internal network probing. Version 1.3.15 contains a fix for the issue. |
| The Photo Gallery Slideshow & Masonry Tiled Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.15 via the rjg_get_youtube_info_justified_gallery_callback function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to retrieve limited information from internal services. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the APROL Web Portal used in B&R APROL <4.4-00P5 may allow an authenticated network-based attacker to force the web server to request arbitrary URLs. |
| The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. (CWE-918)
Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, do not validate the Host header of incoming HTTP/HTTPS requests.
By providing URLs to unexpected hosts or ports, attackers can make it appear that the server is sending the request, possibly bypassing access controls such as firewalls that prevent the attackers from accessing the URLs directly. The server can be used as a proxy to conduct port scanning of hosts in internal networks, use other URLs such as that can access documents on the system (using file://), or use other protocols such as gopher:// or tftp://, which may provide greater control over the contents of requests. |
| An issue was discovered in mipjz 5.0.5. In the push method of app\tag\controller\ApiAdminTag.php the value of the postAddress parameter is not processed and is directly passed into curl_exec execution and output, resulting in Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that can read server files. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Icegram Icegram Express Pro email-subscribers-premium allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Icegram Express Pro: from n/a through <= 5.9.5. |
| A vulnerability was found in WISI Tangram GT31 up to 20241214 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
