Search Results (25 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2007-6721 1 Bouncycastle 2 Bc-java, Bouncy-castle-crypto-package 2026-04-23 N/A
The Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography API before release 1.38, as used in Crypto Provider Package before 1.36, has unknown impact and remote attack vectors related to "a Bleichenbacher vulnerability in simple RSA CMS signatures without signed attributes."
CVE-2026-5598 1 Bouncycastle 1 Bc-java 2026-04-22 7.5 High
Covert timing channel vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC-JAVA core on all (core modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files FrodoEngine.Java. This issue affects BC-JAVA: from 1.71 before 1.84.
CVE-2026-5588 1 Bouncycastle 1 Bc-java 2026-04-22 7.5 High
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC-JAVA bcpkix on all (pkix modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BCPKIX-FIPS bcpkix on All (pkix modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files JcaContentVerifierProviderBuilder.Java. This issue affects BC-JAVA: from 1.67 before 1.84; BCPKIX-FIPS: from 2.0.6 before 2.0.11, from 2.1.7 before 2.1.11.
CVE-2026-3505 1 Bouncycastle 1 Bc-java 2026-04-22 7.5 High
Allocation of resources without limits or throttling, Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC-JAVA bcpg on all (pg modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files AEADEncDataPacket.Java, BcAEADUtil.Java, JceAEADUtil.Java, OperatorHelper.Java. This issue affects BC-JAVA: from 1.74 before 1.84.
CVE-2026-0636 1 Bouncycastle 1 Bc-java 2026-04-17 6.5 Medium
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an LDAP query ('LDAP injection') vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC-JAVA bcprov on all (prov modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files LDAPStoreHelper. This issue affects BC-JAVA: from 1.74 before 1.84.
CVE-2025-14813 1 Bouncycastle 1 Bc-java 2026-04-17 7.5 High
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC-JAVA bcprov on all (core modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files G3413CTRBlockCipher. GOSTCTR implementation unable to process more than 255 blocks correctly. This issue affects BC-JAVA: from 1.59 before 1.84.
CVE-2024-29857 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat 8 Bc-fja, Bc-java, Bc C .net and 5 more 2026-04-15 7.5 High
An issue was discovered in ECCurve.java and ECCurve.cs in Bouncy Castle Java (BC Java) before 1.78, BC Java LTS before 2.73.6, BC-FJA before 1.0.2.5, and BC C# .Net before 2.3.1. Importing an EC certificate with crafted F2m parameters can lead to excessive CPU consumption during the evaluation of the curve parameters.
CVE-2016-1000343 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat 5 Bc-java, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more 2025-05-12 N/A
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA key pair generator generates a weak private key if used with default values. If the JCA key pair generator is not explicitly initialised with DSA parameters, 1.55 and earlier generates a private value assuming a 1024 bit key size. In earlier releases this can be dealt with by explicitly passing parameters to the key pair generator.
CVE-2016-1000345 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat 5 Bc-java, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more 2025-05-12 N/A
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES/ECIES CBC mode vulnerable to padding oracle attack. For BC 1.55 and older, in an environment where timings can be easily observed, it is possible with enough observations to identify when the decryption is failing due to padding.
CVE-2016-1000346 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat 5 Bc-java, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more 2025-05-12 N/A
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the other party DH public key is not fully validated. This can cause issues as invalid keys can be used to reveal details about the other party's private key where static Diffie-Hellman is in use. As of release 1.56 the key parameters are checked on agreement calculation.
CVE-2016-1000352 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat 4 Bc-java, Jboss Fuse, Satellite and 1 more 2025-05-12 N/A
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the ECIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider.
CVE-2016-1000341 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat 5 Bc-java, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more 2025-05-12 N/A
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier DSA signature generation is vulnerable to timing attack. Where timings can be closely observed for the generation of signatures, the lack of blinding in 1.55, or earlier, may allow an attacker to gain information about the signature's k value and ultimately the private value as well.
CVE-2016-1000344 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat 4 Bc-java, Jboss Fuse, Satellite and 1 more 2025-05-12 N/A
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider.
CVE-2013-1624 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat 8 Bc-java, Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\#-cryptography-api, Jboss Amq and 5 more 2025-05-12 N/A
The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169.
CVE-2016-1000339 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat 5 Bc-java, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more 2025-05-12 N/A
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the primary engine class used for AES was AESFastEngine. Due to the highly table driven approach used in the algorithm it turns out that if the data channel on the CPU can be monitored the lookup table accesses are sufficient to leak information on the AES key being used. There was also a leak in AESEngine although it was substantially less. AESEngine has been modified to remove any signs of leakage (testing carried out on Intel X86-64) and is now the primary AES class for the BC JCE provider from 1.56. Use of AESFastEngine is now only recommended where otherwise deemed appropriate.
CVE-2018-1000180 5 Bouncycastle, Debian, Netapp and 2 more 24 Bc-java, Fips Java Api, Debian Linux and 21 more 2025-05-12 N/A
Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later.
CVE-2020-28052 4 Apache, Bouncycastle, Oracle and 1 more 27 Karaf, Bc-java, Banking Corporate Lending Process Management and 24 more 2025-05-12 8.1 High
An issue was discovered in Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC Java 1.65 and 1.66. The OpenBSDBCrypt.checkPassword utility method compared incorrect data when checking the password, allowing incorrect passwords to indicate they were matching with previously hashed ones that were different.
CVE-2016-2427 2 Bouncycastle, Google 2 Bc-java, Android 2025-05-12 N/A
The AES-GCM specification in RFC 5084, as used in Android 5.x and 6.x, recommends 12 octets for the aes-ICVlen parameter field, which might make it easier for attackers to defeat a cryptographic protection mechanism and discover an authentication key via a crafted application, aka internal bug 26234568. NOTE: The vendor disputes the existence of this potential issue in Android, stating "This CVE was raised in error: it referred to the authentication tag size in GCM, whose default according to ASN.1 encoding (12 bytes) can lead to vulnerabilities. After careful consideration, it was decided that the insecure default value of 12 bytes was a default only for the encoding and not default anywhere else in Android, and hence no vulnerability existed.
CVE-2017-13098 1 Bouncycastle 1 Bc-java 2025-05-12 N/A
BouncyCastle TLS prior to version 1.0.3, when configured to use the JCE (Java Cryptography Extension) for cryptographic functions, provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key exchange is negotiated. An attacker can recover the private key from a vulnerable application. This vulnerability is referred to as "ROBOT."
CVE-2018-1000613 4 Bouncycastle, Netapp, Opensuse and 1 more 24 Bc-java, Oncommand Workflow Automation, Leap and 21 more 2025-05-12 9.8 Critical
Legion of the Bouncy Castle Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography APIs 1.58 up to but not including 1.60 contains a CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in XMSS/XMSS^MT private key deserialization that can result in Deserializing an XMSS/XMSS^MT private key can result in the execution of unexpected code. This attack appear to be exploitable via A handcrafted private key can include references to unexpected classes which will be picked up from the class path for the executing application. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.60 and later.