Search Results (6 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2014-3342 1 Cisco 2 Cli, Ios Xr 2025-04-12 N/A
The CLI in Cisco IOS XR allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified commands, aka Bug IDs CSCuq42336, CSCuq76853, CSCuq76873, and CSCuq45383.
CVE-2007-4430 1 Cisco 5 Cbos, Cli, Ids and 2 more 2025-04-09 N/A
Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (device restart and BGP routing table rebuild) via certain regular expressions in a "show ip bgp regexp" command. NOTE: unauthenticated remote attacks are possible in environments with anonymous telnet and Looking Glass access.
CVE-2004-0081 23 4d, Apple, Avaya and 20 more 67 Webstar, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 64 more 2025-04-03 N/A
OpenSSL 0.9.6 before 0.9.6d does not properly handle unknown message types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), as demonstrated using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool.
CVE-2004-0112 24 4d, Apple, Avaya and 21 more 65 Webstar, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 62 more 2025-04-03 N/A
The SSL/TLS handshaking code in OpenSSL 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b, and 0.9.7c, when using Kerberos ciphersuites, does not properly check the length of Kerberos tickets during a handshake, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that causes an out-of-bounds read.
CVE-2004-0079 23 4d, Apple, Avaya and 20 more 67 Webstar, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 64 more 2025-04-03 7.5 High
The do_change_cipher_spec function in OpenSSL 0.9.6c to 0.9.6k, and 0.9.7a to 0.9.7c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that triggers a null dereference.
CVE-2024-3661 10 Apple, Cisco, Citrix and 7 more 13 Iphone Os, Macos, Anyconnect Vpn Client and 10 more 2025-01-15 7.6 High
DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). VPN-based security solutions that rely on routes to redirect traffic can be forced to leak traffic over the physical interface. An attacker on the same local network can read, disrupt, or possibly modify network traffic that was expected to be protected by the VPN.