Search
Search Results (13 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-12088 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 21 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 18 more | 2025-08-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in rsync. When using the `--safe-links` option, the rsync client fails to properly verify if a symbolic link destination sent from the server contains another symbolic link within it. This results in a path traversal vulnerability, which may lead to arbitrary file write outside the desired directory. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12087 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 20 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 17 more | 2025-08-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in rsync. It stems from behavior enabled by the `--inc-recursive` option, a default-enabled option for many client options and can be enabled by the server even if not explicitly enabled by the client. When using the `--inc-recursive` option, a lack of proper symlink verification coupled with deduplication checks occurring on a per-file-list basis could allow a server to write files outside of the client's intended destination directory. A malicious server could write malicious files to arbitrary locations named after valid directories/paths on the client. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12085 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 28 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 25 more | 2025-08-12 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in rsync which could be triggered when rsync compares file checksums. This flaw allows an attacker to manipulate the checksum length (s2length) to cause a comparison between a checksum and uninitialized memory and leak one byte of uninitialized stack data at a time. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12086 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 10 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 7 more | 2025-07-29 | 6.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in rsync. It could allow a server to enumerate the contents of an arbitrary file from the client's machine. This issue occurs when files are being copied from a client to a server. During this process, the rsync server will send checksums of local data to the client to compare with in order to determine what data needs to be sent to the server. By sending specially constructed checksum values for arbitrary files, an attacker may be able to reconstruct the data of those files byte-by-byte based on the responses from the client. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12084 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 9 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 6 more | 2025-07-29 | 9.8 Critical |
| A heap-based buffer overflow flaw was found in the rsync daemon. This issue is due to improper handling of attacker-controlled checksum lengths (s2length) in the code. When MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH (16 bytes), an attacker can write out of bounds in the sum2 buffer. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1097 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rsync | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| rsync 3.x before 3.0.8, when certain recursion, deletion, and ownership options are used, allows remote rsync servers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via malformed data. | ||||
| CVE-2007-6200 | 3 Redhat, Rsync, Slackware | 3 Enterprise Linux, Rsync, Slackware Linux | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in rsync before 3.0.0pre6, when running a writable rsync daemon, allows remote attackers to bypass exclude, exclude_from, and filter and read or write hidden files via (1) symlink, (2) partial-dir, (3) backup-dir, and unspecified (4) dest options. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0962 | 4 Andrew Tridgell, Engardelinux, Redhat and 1 more | 7 Rsync, Secure Community, Secure Linux and 4 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in rsync before 2.5.7, when running in server mode, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and possibly escape the chroot jail. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0080 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 2 Linux, Rsync | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| rsync, when running in daemon mode, does not properly call setgroups before dropping privileges, which could provide supplemental group privileges to local users, who could then read certain files that would otherwise be disallowed. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0048 | 2 Andrew Tridgell, Redhat | 2 Rsync, Linux | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple signedness errors (mixed signed and unsigned numbers) in the I/O functions of rsync 2.4.6, 2.3.2, and other versions allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service and execute arbitrary code in the rsync client or server. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0426 | 2 Andrew Tridgell, Redhat | 2 Rsync, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| rsync before 2.6.1 does not properly sanitize paths when running a read/write daemon without using chroot, which allows remote attackers to write files outside of the module's path. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0792 | 2 Andrew Tridgell, Redhat | 2 Rsync, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the sanitize_path function in util.c for rsync 2.6.2 and earlier, when chroot is disabled, allows attackers to read or write certain files. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29154 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Samba | 6 Fedora, Enterprise Linux, Rhel E4s and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.4 High |
| An issue was discovered in rsync before 3.2.5 that allows malicious remote servers to write arbitrary files inside the directories of connecting peers. The server chooses which files/directories are sent to the client. However, the rsync client performs insufficient validation of file names. A malicious rsync server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can overwrite arbitrary files in the rsync client target directory and subdirectories (for example, overwrite the .ssh/authorized_keys file). | ||||
Page 1 of 1.