Search

Use the Query Builder to create your own search query, or check out the documentation to learn the search syntax.

Search Examples

CVEs in KEV CVEs with EPSS >= 80% Crit. Microsoft High Apache SQL Injection (CWE-89) Linux Kernel High (CVSS 3.1) Apache Struts RCE (Remote Code Execution) XSS (CWE-79) Critical (CVSS 4.0) CVEs to check

Search Results (5 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2008-1227 1 Silc 1 Silc Toolkit 2025-04-09 N/A
Stack-based buffer overflow in the silc_fingerprint function in lib/silcutil/silcutil.c in Secure Internet Live Conferencing (SILC) Toolkit 1.1.5, and unspecified earlier versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via long input data. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
CVE-2007-3728 1 Silc 2 Silc Client, Silc Toolkit 2025-04-09 N/A
Buffer overflow in lib/silcclient/client_notify.c of SILC Client and SILC Toolkit before 1.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via "NICK_CHANGE" notifications.
CVE-2007-1327 1 Silc 1 Silc-server 2025-04-09 N/A
The SILC_SERVER_CMD_FUNC function in apps/silcd/command.c in silc-server 1.0.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL dereference and daemon crash) via a request without a cipher algorithm and an invalid HMAC algorithm.
CVE-2008-1429 1 Silc 1 Silc-server 2025-04-09 N/A
Secure Internet Live Conferencing (SILC) Server before 1.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a NEW_CLIENT packet without a nickname.
CVE-2008-1552 2 Redhat, Silc 5 Fedora, Silc, Silc Client and 2 more 2025-04-09 N/A
The silc_pkcs1_decode function in the silccrypt library (silcpkcs1.c) in Secure Internet Live Conferencing (SILC) Toolkit before 1.1.7, SILC Client before 1.1.4, and SILC Server before 1.1.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PKCS#1 message, which triggers an integer underflow, signedness error, and a buffer overflow. NOTE: the researcher describes this as an integer overflow, but CVE uses the "underflow" term in cases of wraparound from unsigned subtraction.