Filtered by vendor Enghouse Subscriptions
Filtered by product Web Chat Subscriptions
Total 5 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2020-13972 1 Enghouse 1 Web Chat 2024-11-21 6.1 Medium
Enghouse Web Chat 6.2.284.34 allows XSS. When one enters their own domain name in the WebServiceLocation parameter, the response from the POST request is displayed, and any JavaScript returned from the external server is executed in the browser. This is related to CVE-2019-16951.
CVE-2019-16951 1 Enghouse 1 Web Chat 2024-11-21 5.3 Medium
A remote file include (RFI) issue was discovered in Enghouse Web Chat 6.2.284.34. One can replace the localhost attribute with one's own domain name. When the product calls this domain after the POST request is sent, it retrieves an attacker's data and displays it. Also worth mentioning is the amount of information sent in the request from this product to the attacker: it reveals information the public should not have. This includes pathnames and internal ip addresses.
CVE-2019-16950 1 Enghouse 1 Web Chat 2024-11-21 6.1 Medium
An XSS issue was discovered in Enghouse Web Chat 6.1.300.31 and 6.2.284.34. The QueueName parameter of a GET request allows for insertion of user-supplied JavaScript.
CVE-2019-16949 1 Enghouse 1 Web Chat 2024-11-21 6.5 Medium
An issue was discovered in Enghouse Web Chat 6.1.300.31 and 6.2.284.34. A user is allowed to send an archive of their chat log to an email address specified at the beginning of the chat (where the user enters in their name and e-mail address). This POST request can be modified to change the message as well as the end recipient of the message. The e-mail address will have the same domain name and user as the product allotted. This can be used in phishing campaigns against users on the same domain.
CVE-2019-16948 1 Enghouse 1 Web Chat 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
An SSRF issue was discovered in Enghouse Web Chat 6.1.300.31. In any POST request, one can replace the port number at WebServiceLocation=http://localhost:8085/UCWebServices/ with a range of ports to determine what is visible on the internal network (as opposed to what general web traffic would see on the product's host). The response from open ports is different than from closed ports. The product does not allow one to change the protocol: anything except http(s) will throw an error; however, it is the type of error that allows one to determine if a port is open or not.