Total
2909 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-21218 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Windows Kerberos Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21300 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Windows upnphost.dll Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21231 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| IP Helper Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21230 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21207 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Windows Connected Devices Platform Service (Cdpsvc) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21330 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Windows Remote Desktop Services Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21389 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Windows upnphost.dll Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21290 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21289 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21270 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21251 | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-49075 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 7 more | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High |
| Windows Remote Desktop Services Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-49129 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 and 2 more | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High |
| Windows Remote Desktop Gateway (RD Gateway) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-49096 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2025-01-15 | 7.5 High |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-28217 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Windows Network Address Translation (NAT) Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-33720 | 1 Mp4v2 Project | 1 Mp4v2 | 2025-01-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| mp4v2 v2.1.2 was discovered to contain a memory leak via the class MP4BytesProperty. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9518 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 26 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 23 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12076 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in SYNO.Core.PortForwarding.Rules in Synology DiskStation (DSM) before 6.1.1-15088 allows remote authenticated attacker to exhaust the memory resources of the machine, causing a denial of service attack. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9511 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 29 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 26 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9513 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 25 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 22 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||