Total
64 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-3561 | 1 Cisco | 3 Adaptive Security Appliance, Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firepower Threat Defense | 2024-11-13 | 4.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the Clientless SSL VPN (WebVPN) of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers in the responses of the affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper input sanitization. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct a CRLF injection attack, adding arbitrary HTTP headers in the responses of the system and redirecting the user to arbitrary websites. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51501 | 1 Reactiveui | 1 Refit | 2024-11-08 | N/A |
| Refit is an automatic type-safe REST library for .NET Core, Xamarin and .NET The various header-related Refit attributes (Header, HeaderCollection and Authorize) are vulnerable to CRLF injection. The way HTTP headers are added to a request is via the `HttpHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation` method. This method does not check for CRLF characters in the header value. This means that any headers added to a refit request are vulnerable to CRLF-injection. In general, CRLF-injection into a HTTP header (when using HTTP/1.1) means that one can inject additional HTTP headers or smuggle whole HTTP requests. If an application using the Refit library passes a user-controllable value through to a header, then that application becomes vulnerable to CRLF-injection. This is not necessarily a security issue for a command line application like the one above, but if such code were present in a web application then it becomes vulnerable to request splitting (as shown in the PoC) and thus Server Side Request Forgery. Strictly speaking this is a potential vulnerability in applications using Refit and not in Refit itself. This issue has been addressed in release versions 7.2.22 and 8.0.0 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26130 | 2 Cpp-httplib Project, Yhirose | 2 Cpp-httplib, Cpp-httplib | 2024-10-28 | 7.5 High |
| Versions of the package yhirose/cpp-httplib before 0.12.4 are vulnerable to CRLF Injection when untrusted user input is used to set the content-type header in the HTTP .Patch, .Post, .Put and .Delete requests. This can lead to logical errors and other misbehaviors. **Note:** This issue is present due to an incomplete fix for [CVE-2020-11709](https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-UNMANAGED-YHIROSECPPHTTPLIB-2366507). | ||||
| CVE-2023-34472 | 1 Ami | 1 Megarac Sp-x | 2024-10-28 | 5.7 Medium |
| AMI SPx contains a vulnerability in the BMC where an Attacker may cause an improper neutralization of CRLF sequences in HTTP Headers. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to a loss of integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45302 | 1 Restsharp | 1 Restsharp | 2024-10-01 | 6.1 Medium |
| RestSharp is a Simple REST and HTTP API Client for .NET. The second argument to `RestRequest.AddHeader` (the header value) is vulnerable to CRLF injection. The same applies to `RestRequest.AddOrUpdateHeader` and `RestClient.AddDefaultHeader`. The way HTTP headers are added to a request is via the `HttpHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation` method which does not check for CRLF characters in the header value. This means that any headers from a `RestSharp.RequestHeaders` object are added to the request in such a way that they are vulnerable to CRLF-injection. In general, CRLF-injection into a HTTP header (when using HTTP/1.1) means that one can inject additional HTTP headers or smuggle whole HTTP requests. If an application using the RestSharp library passes a user-controllable value through to a header, then that application becomes vulnerable to CRLF-injection. This is not necessarily a security issue for a command line application like the one above, but if such code were present in a web application then it becomes vulnerable to request splitting (as shown in the PoC) and thus Server Side Request Forgery. Strictly speaking this is a potential vulnerability in applications using RestSharp, not in RestSharp itself, but I would argue that at the very least there needs to be a warning about this behaviour in the RestSharp documentation. RestSharp has addressed this issue in version 112.0.0. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26148 | 1 Ithewei | 1 Libhv | 2024-09-23 | 5.4 Medium |
| All versions of the package ithewei/libhv are vulnerable to CRLF Injection when untrusted user input is used to set request headers. An attacker can add the \r\n (carriage return line feeds) characters and inject additional headers in the request sent. | ||||
| CVE-2015-9097 | 1 Mail Project | 1 Mail | 2024-09-17 | N/A |
| The mail gem before 2.5.5 for Ruby (aka A Really Ruby Mail Library) is vulnerable to SMTP command injection via CRLF sequences in a RCPT TO or MAIL FROM command, as demonstrated by CRLF sequences immediately before and after a DATA substring. | ||||
| CVE-2020-3246 | 1 Cisco | 1 Umbrella | 2024-09-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web server of Cisco Umbrella could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a carriage return line feed (CRLF) injection attack against a user of an affected service. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to access a crafted URL. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into valid HTTP responses sent to the browser of the user. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14037 | 1 Crushftp | 1 Crushftp | 2024-09-17 | N/A |
| CrushFTP before 7.8.0 and 8.x before 8.2.0 has an HTTP header vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2019-7313 | 1 Buildbot | 1 Buildbot | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
| www/resource.py in Buildbot before 1.8.1 allows CRLF injection in the Location header of /auth/login and /auth/logout via the redirect parameter. This affects other web sites in the same domain. | ||||
| CVE-2018-12477 | 1 Opensuse | 1 Leap | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
| A Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences vulnerability in Open Build Service allows remote attackers to cause deletion of directories by tricking obs-service-refresh_patches to delete them. Affected releases are openSUSE Open Build Service: versions prior to d6244245dda5367767efc989446fe4b5e4609cce. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4975 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Http Server, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
| Possible CRLF injection allowing HTTP response splitting attacks for sites which use mod_userdir. This issue was mitigated by changes made in 2.4.25 and 2.2.32 which prohibit CR or LF injection into the "Location" or other outbound header key or value. Fixed in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.25 (Affected 2.4.1-2.4.23). Fixed in Apache HTTP Server 2.2.32 (Affected 2.2.0-2.2.31). | ||||
| CVE-2024-45597 | 1 Pluto | 1 Pluto | 2024-09-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| Pluto is a superset of Lua 5.4 with a focus on general-purpose programming. Scripts passing user-controlled values to http.request header values are affected. An attacker could use this to send arbitrary requests, potentially leveraging authentication tokens provided in the same headers table. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4767 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Desktop Central | 2024-09-05 | 6.1 Medium |
| A CRLF injection vulnerability has been found in ManageEngine Desktop Central affecting version 9.1.0. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and perform HTTP response splitting attacks via the fileName parameter in /STATE_ID/1613157927228/InvSWMetering.csv. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4768 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Desktop Central | 2024-09-05 | 6.1 Medium |
| A CRLF injection vulnerability has been found in ManageEngine Desktop Central affecting version 9.1.0. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and perform HTTP response splitting attacks via the fileName parameter in /STATE_ID/1613157927228/InvSWMetering.pdf. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40324 | 1 Datex-soft | 1 E-staff | 2024-08-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| A CRLF injection vulnerability in E-Staff v5.1 allows attackers to insert Carriage Return (CR) and Line Feed (LF) characters into input fields, leading to HTTP response splitting and header manipulation. | ||||
| CVE-2007-0892 | 1 Matthieu Aubry | 1 Phpmyvisites | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in phpMyVisites before 2.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the url parameter, when the pagename parameter begins with "FILE:". | ||||
| CVE-2014-9563 | 2 Atos, Unify | 8 Openscape Desk Phone Ip 35g, Openscape Desk Phone Ip 35g Eco, Openscape Desk Phone Ip 55g and 5 more | 2024-08-06 | 4.9 Medium |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the web-based management (WBM) interface in Unify (former Siemens) OpenStage SIP and OpenScape Desk Phone IP V3 devices before R3.32.0 allows remote authenticated users to modify the root password and consequently access the debug port using the serial interface via the ssh-password parameter to page.cmd. | ||||
| CVE-2014-9564 | 1 Ibm | 4 En6131, En6131 Firmware, Ib6131 and 1 more | 2024-08-06 | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in IBM Flex System EN6131 40Gb Ethernet and IB6131 40Gb Infiniband Switch firmware before 3.4.1110 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks and resulting web cache poisoning or cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, or obtain sensitive information via multiple unspecified parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2014-2017 | 1 Oxidforge | 1 Eshop | 2024-08-06 | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in OXID eShop Professional Edition before 4.7.11 and 4.8.x before 4.8.4, Enterprise Edition before 5.0.11 and 5.1.x before 5.1.4, and Community Edition before 4.7.11 and 4.8.x before 4.8.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | ||||