A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe (can't PUT from an HTML form or such) but POST allows creating in-order keys that an attacker can send.
Advisories
Source ID Title
EUVD EUVD EUVD-2022-0838 A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe (can't PUT from an HTML form or such) but POST allows creating in-order keys that an attacker can send.
Github GHSA Github GHSA GHSA-5gjm-fj42-x983 etcd Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Fixes

Solution

No solution given by the vendor.


Workaround

No workaround given by the vendor.

History

No history.

cve-icon MITRE

Status: PUBLISHED

Assigner: redhat

Published:

Updated: 2024-08-05T03:51:48.502Z

Reserved: 2017-12-04T00:00:00

Link: CVE-2018-1098

cve-icon Vulnrichment

No data.

cve-icon NVD

Status : Modified

Published: 2018-04-03T16:29:00.237

Modified: 2024-11-21T03:59:10.670

Link: CVE-2018-1098

cve-icon Redhat

Severity : Moderate

Publid Date: 2018-03-07T00:00:00Z

Links: CVE-2018-1098 - Bugzilla

cve-icon OpenCVE Enrichment

No data.