Description
In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. One example of protected fields is the GTM monitor password.
No analysis available yet.
Remediation
No remediation available yet.
Tracking
Sign in to view the affected projects.
Advisories
| Source | ID | Title |
|---|---|---|
EUVD |
EUVD-2020-27097 | In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. One example of protected fields is the GTM monitor password. |
References
| Link | Providers |
|---|---|
| https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K20059815 |
|
History
No history.
Subscriptions
F5
Subscribe
Big-ip Access Policy Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall
Subscribe
Big-ip Analytics
Subscribe
Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Application Security Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Ddos Hybrid Defender
Subscribe
Big-ip Domain Name System
Subscribe
Big-ip Fraud Protection Service
Subscribe
Big-ip Global Traffic Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Link Controller
Subscribe
Big-ip Local Traffic Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Policy Enforcement Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Ssl Orchestrator
Subscribe
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: f5
Published:
Updated: 2024-08-04T08:47:40.910Z
Reserved: 2020-01-06T00:00:00.000Z
Link: CVE-2020-5943
No data.
Status : Modified
Published: 2020-11-05T20:15:17.753
Modified: 2024-11-21T05:34:52.570
Link: CVE-2020-5943
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
No data.
Weaknesses
EUVD