In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. One example of protected fields is the GTM monitor password.
Project Subscriptions
| Vendors | Products |
|---|---|
|
F5
Subscribe
|
Big-ip Access Policy Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall
Subscribe
Big-ip Analytics
Subscribe
Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Application Security Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Ddos Hybrid Defender
Subscribe
Big-ip Domain Name System
Subscribe
Big-ip Fraud Protection Service
Subscribe
Big-ip Global Traffic Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Link Controller
Subscribe
Big-ip Local Traffic Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Policy Enforcement Manager
Subscribe
Big-ip Ssl Orchestrator
Subscribe
|
Advisories
| Source | ID | Title |
|---|---|---|
EUVD |
EUVD-2020-27097 | In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. One example of protected fields is the GTM monitor password. |
Fixes
Solution
No solution given by the vendor.
Workaround
No workaround given by the vendor.
References
| Link | Providers |
|---|---|
| https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K20059815 |
|
History
No history.
Projects
Sign in to view the affected projects.
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: f5
Published:
Updated: 2024-08-04T08:47:40.910Z
Reserved: 2020-01-06T00:00:00
Link: CVE-2020-5943
No data.
Status : Modified
Published: 2020-11-05T20:15:17.753
Modified: 2024-11-21T05:34:52.570
Link: CVE-2020-5943
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
No data.
Weaknesses
EUVD