{"containers": {"cna": {"affected": [{"product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [{"status": "affected", "version": "n/a"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in resize_packet (called from FuzzResizePacket and fuzz_rfc1035.c) because of the lack of a proper bounds check upon pseudo header re-insertion. NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\" However, a contributor states that a security patch (mentioned in 016162.html) is needed"}], "problemTypes": [{"descriptions": [{"description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text"}]}], "providerMetadata": {"dateUpdated": "2022-02-19T21:21:55", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre"}, "references": [{"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-932.yaml"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35898"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html"}], "tags": ["disputed"], "x_legacyV4Record": {"CVE_data_meta": {"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2021-45955", "STATE": "PUBLIC"}, "affects": {"vendor": {"vendor_data": [{"product": {"product_data": [{"product_name": "n/a", "version": {"version_data": [{"version_value": "n/a"}]}}]}, "vendor_name": "n/a"}]}}, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": {"description_data": [{"lang": "eng", "value": "** DISPUTED ** Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in resize_packet (called from FuzzResizePacket and fuzz_rfc1035.c) because of the lack of a proper bounds check upon pseudo header re-insertion. NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\" However, a contributor states that a security patch (mentioned in 016162.html) is needed."}]}, "problemtype": {"problemtype_data": [{"description": [{"lang": "eng", "value": "n/a"}]}]}, "references": {"reference_data": [{"name": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-932.yaml", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-932.yaml"}, {"name": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35898", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35898"}, {"name": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html"}, {"name": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html"}]}}}, "adp": [{"metrics": [{"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"timestamp": "2024-06-11T15:10:09.481544Z", "id": "CVE-2021-45955", "options": [{"Exploitation": "poc"}, {"Automatable": "yes"}, {"Technical Impact": "total"}], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "version": "2.0.3"}}}], "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2024-06-11T15:10:17.876Z"}}, {"providerMetadata": {"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T04:54:31.055Z"}, "title": "CVE Program Container", "references": [{"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-932.yaml"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35898"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html"}, {"tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html"}]}]}, "cveMetadata": {"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2021-45955", "datePublished": "2021-12-31T23:53:42", "dateReserved": "2021-12-31T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T04:54:31.055Z", "state": "PUBLISHED"}, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1"}

{"dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "containers": {"adp": [{"title": "CVE Program Container", "references": [{"url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-932.yaml", "tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"]}, {"url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35898", "tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"]}, {"url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html", "tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"]}, {"url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html", "tags": ["x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred"]}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T04:54:31.055Z"}}, {"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "metrics": [{"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"id": "CVE-2021-45955", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "options": [{"Exploitation": "poc"}, {"Automatable": "yes"}, {"Technical Impact": "total"}], "version": "2.0.3", "timestamp": "2024-06-11T15:10:09.481544Z"}}}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2024-06-11T15:10:13.960Z"}}], "cna": {"tags": ["disputed"], "affected": [{"vendor": "n/a", "product": "n/a", "versions": [{"status": "affected", "version": "n/a"}]}], "references": [{"url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-932.yaml", "tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"]}, {"url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35898", "tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"]}, {"url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html", "tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"]}, {"url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html", "tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in resize_packet (called from FuzzResizePacket and fuzz_rfc1035.c) because of the lack of a proper bounds check upon pseudo header re-insertion. NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\" However, a contributor states that a security patch (mentioned in 016162.html) is needed"}], "problemTypes": [{"descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "type": "text", "description": "n/a"}]}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre", "dateUpdated": "2022-02-19T21:21:55"}, "x_legacyV4Record": {"affects": {"vendor": {"vendor_data": [{"product": {"product_data": [{"version": {"version_data": [{"version_value": "n/a"}]}, "product_name": "n/a"}]}, "vendor_name": "n/a"}]}}, "data_type": "CVE", "references": {"reference_data": [{"url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-932.yaml", "name": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-932.yaml", "refsource": "MISC"}, {"url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35898", "name": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35898", "refsource": "MISC"}, {"url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html", "name": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html", "refsource": "MISC"}, {"url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html", "name": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html", "refsource": "MISC"}]}, "data_format": "MITRE", "description": {"description_data": [{"lang": "eng", "value": "** DISPUTED ** Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in resize_packet (called from FuzzResizePacket and fuzz_rfc1035.c) because of the lack of a proper bounds check upon pseudo header re-insertion. NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\" However, a contributor states that a security patch (mentioned in 016162.html) is needed."}]}, "problemtype": {"problemtype_data": [{"description": [{"lang": "eng", "value": "n/a"}]}]}, "data_version": "4.0", "CVE_data_meta": {"ID": "CVE-2021-45955", "STATE": "PUBLIC", "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org"}}}}, "cveMetadata": {"cveId": "CVE-2021-45955", "state": "PUBLISHED", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T04:54:31.055Z", "dateReserved": "2021-12-31T00:00:00", "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "datePublished": "2021-12-31T23:53:42", "assignerShortName": "mitre"}, "dataVersion": "5.1"}

{"configurations": [{"nodes": [{"cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:thekelleys:dnsmasq:2.86:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "8F823B95-CBE5-4597-9DEE-8E9B833940A7", "vulnerable": true}], "negate": false, "operator": "OR"}]}], "cveTags": [{"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": ["disputed"]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in resize_packet (called from FuzzResizePacket and fuzz_rfc1035.c) because of the lack of a proper bounds check upon pseudo header re-insertion. NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\" However, a contributor states that a security patch (mentioned in 016162.html) is needed"}, {"lang": "es", "value": "** EN DISPUTA ** Dnsmasq versi\u00f3n 2.86 presenta un desbordamiento de buffer en la regi\u00f3n heap de la memoria en la funci\u00f3n resize_packet (llamado desde FuzzResizePacket y fuzz_rfc1035.c). NOTA: la posici\u00f3n del proveedor es que CVE-2021-45951 a CVE-2021-45957 \"no representan vulnerabilidades reales, seg\u00fan nuestro conocimiento\". Sin embargo, un colaborador afirma que es necesario un parche de seguridad (mencionado en 016162.html)"}], "id": "CVE-2021-45955", "lastModified": "2024-08-04T05:15:56.843", "metrics": {"cvssMetricV2": [{"acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "cvssData": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 7.5, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0"}, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false}], "cvssMetricV31": [{"cvssData": {"attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1"}, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary"}]}, "published": "2022-01-01T00:15:08.677", "references": [{"source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": ["Exploit", "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory"], "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35898"}, {"source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": ["Third Party Advisory"], "url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-932.yaml"}, {"source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": ["Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory"], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html"}, {"source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": ["Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory"], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html"}], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [{"description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-787"}], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary"}]}

{"bugzilla": {"description": "dnsmasq: heap-based buffer overflow in resize_packet", "id": "2048928", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048928"}, "csaw": false, "cvss3": {"cvss3_base_score": "0.0", "cvss3_scoring_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N", "status": "draft"}, "cwe": "CWE-787", "details": ["Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in resize_packet (called from FuzzResizePacket and fuzz_rfc1035.c) because of the lack of a proper bounds check upon pseudo header re-insertion. NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\" However, a contributor states that a security patch (mentioned in 016162.html) is needed", "A heap-based out-of-bounds WRITE flaw was found in dnsmasq. A remote attacker who can trigger a packet resize can use this flaw to write up to 50 bytes to the heap via a memmove call."], "name": "CVE-2021-45955", "package_state": [{"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6", "fix_state": "Not affected", "package_name": "dnsmasq", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7", "fix_state": "Not affected", "package_name": "dnsmasq", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8", "fix_state": "Not affected", "package_name": "dnsmasq", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9", "fix_state": "Not affected", "package_name": "dnsmasq", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:openstack:13", "fix_state": "Not affected", "package_name": "dnsmasq", "product_name": "Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)"}], "public_date": "2022-01-01T00:00:00Z", "references": ["https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45955\nhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-45955\nhttps://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html"], "statement": "Red Hat Product Security does not consider this to be a vulnerability."}