{"dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "cveMetadata": {"cveId": "CVE-2024-40998", "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "state": "PUBLISHED", "assignerShortName": "Linux", "dateReserved": "2024-07-12T12:17:45.607Z", "datePublished": "2024-07-12T12:37:39.823Z", "dateUpdated": "2024-11-05T09:34:45.822Z"}, "containers": {"cna": {"providerMetadata": {"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "shortName": "Linux", "dateUpdated": "2024-11-05T09:34:45.822Z"}, "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()\n\nIn the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs->lock:\n\next4_fill_super\n ext4_register_sysfs\n // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms\n // Other processes modify rs->interval to\n // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms\n ext4_orphan_cleanup\n ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, \"Errors on filesystem, \"\n __ext4_msg\n ___ratelimit(&(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state)\n if (!rs->interval) // do nothing if interval is 0\n return 1;\n raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags)\n raw_spin_trylock(lock)\n _raw_spin_trylock\n __raw_spin_trylock\n spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_)\n lock_acquire\n __lock_acquire\n register_lock_class\n assign_lock_key\n dump_stack();\n ratelimit_state_init(&sbi->s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10);\n raw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock);\n // init rs->lock here\n\nand get the following dump_stack:\n\n=========================================================\nINFO: trying to register non-static key.\nThe code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe\nyou didn't initialize this object before use?\nturning off the locking correctness validator.\nCPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170\n dump_stack+0x18/0x30\n register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0\n __lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0\n lock_acquire+0x120/0x450\n _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0\n ___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220\n __ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4]\n ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4]\n __ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4]\n ext4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4]\n[...]\n=========================================================\n\nNormally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so\n___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing\nrs->lock, so it is possible to change rs->interval to a non-zero value\nvia the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs->lock is\nuninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by\naccessing an uninitialized rs->lock. Therefore register sysfs after all\ninitializations are complete to avoid such problems."}], "affected": [{"product": "Linux", "vendor": "Linux", "defaultStatus": "unaffected", "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "programFiles": ["fs/ext4/super.c"], "versions": [{"version": "1da177e4c3f4", "lessThan": "23afcd52af06", "status": "affected", "versionType": "git"}, {"version": "1da177e4c3f4", "lessThan": "645267906944", "status": "affected", "versionType": "git"}, {"version": "1da177e4c3f4", "lessThan": "b4b4fda34e53", "status": "affected", "versionType": "git"}]}, {"product": "Linux", "vendor": "Linux", "defaultStatus": "affected", "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "programFiles": ["fs/ext4/super.c"], "versions": [{"version": "6.6.36", "lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*", "status": "unaffected", "versionType": "semver"}, {"version": "6.9.7", "lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*", "status": "unaffected", "versionType": "semver"}, {"version": "6.10", "lessThanOrEqual": "*", "status": "unaffected", "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"}]}], "references": [{"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23afcd52af06880c6c913a0ad99022b8937b575c"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/645267906944a9aeec9d5c56ee24a9096a288798"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4b4fda34e535756f9e774fb2d09c4537b7dfd1c"}], "title": "ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()", "x_generator": {"engine": "bippy-9e1c9544281a"}}, "adp": [{"providerMetadata": {"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T04:39:56.156Z"}, "title": "CVE Program Container", "references": [{"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23afcd52af06880c6c913a0ad99022b8937b575c", "tags": ["x_transferred"]}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/645267906944a9aeec9d5c56ee24a9096a288798", "tags": ["x_transferred"]}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4b4fda34e535756f9e774fb2d09c4537b7dfd1c", "tags": ["x_transferred"]}]}, {"metrics": [{"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"id": "CVE-2024-40998", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "options": [{"Exploitation": "none"}, {"Automatable": "no"}, {"Technical Impact": "partial"}], "version": "2.0.3", "timestamp": "2024-09-10T17:01:25.647023Z"}}}], "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T17:34:19.460Z"}}]}}

{"dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "containers": {"adp": [{"title": "CVE Program Container", "references": [{"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23afcd52af06880c6c913a0ad99022b8937b575c", "tags": ["x_transferred"]}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/645267906944a9aeec9d5c56ee24a9096a288798", "tags": ["x_transferred"]}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4b4fda34e535756f9e774fb2d09c4537b7dfd1c", "tags": ["x_transferred"]}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T04:39:56.156Z"}}, {"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "metrics": [{"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"id": "CVE-2024-40998", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "options": [{"Exploitation": "none"}, {"Automatable": "no"}, {"Technical Impact": "partial"}], "version": "2.0.3", "timestamp": "2024-09-10T17:01:25.647023Z"}}}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T12:42:21.999Z"}}], "cna": {"title": "ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()", "affected": [{"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "vendor": "Linux", "product": "Linux", "versions": [{"status": "affected", "version": "1da177e4c3f4", "lessThan": "23afcd52af06", "versionType": "git"}, {"status": "affected", "version": "1da177e4c3f4", "lessThan": "645267906944", "versionType": "git"}, {"status": "affected", "version": "1da177e4c3f4", "lessThan": "b4b4fda34e53", "versionType": "git"}], "programFiles": ["fs/ext4/super.c"], "defaultStatus": "unaffected"}, {"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "vendor": "Linux", "product": "Linux", "versions": [{"status": "unaffected", "version": "6.6.36", "versionType": "semver", "lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*"}, {"status": "unaffected", "version": "6.9.7", "versionType": "semver", "lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*"}, {"status": "unaffected", "version": "6.10", "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix", "lessThanOrEqual": "*"}], "programFiles": ["fs/ext4/super.c"], "defaultStatus": "affected"}], "references": [{"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23afcd52af06880c6c913a0ad99022b8937b575c"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/645267906944a9aeec9d5c56ee24a9096a288798"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4b4fda34e535756f9e774fb2d09c4537b7dfd1c"}], "x_generator": {"engine": "bippy-9e1c9544281a"}, "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()\n\nIn the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs->lock:\n\next4_fill_super\n ext4_register_sysfs\n // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms\n // Other processes modify rs->interval to\n // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms\n ext4_orphan_cleanup\n ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, \"Errors on filesystem, \"\n __ext4_msg\n ___ratelimit(&(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state)\n if (!rs->interval) // do nothing if interval is 0\n return 1;\n raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags)\n raw_spin_trylock(lock)\n _raw_spin_trylock\n __raw_spin_trylock\n spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_)\n lock_acquire\n __lock_acquire\n register_lock_class\n assign_lock_key\n dump_stack();\n ratelimit_state_init(&sbi->s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10);\n raw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock);\n // init rs->lock here\n\nand get the following dump_stack:\n\n=========================================================\nINFO: trying to register non-static key.\nThe code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe\nyou didn't initialize this object before use?\nturning off the locking correctness validator.\nCPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170\n dump_stack+0x18/0x30\n register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0\n __lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0\n lock_acquire+0x120/0x450\n _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0\n ___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220\n __ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4]\n ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4]\n __ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4]\n ext4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4]\n[...]\n=========================================================\n\nNormally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so\n___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing\nrs->lock, so it is possible to change rs->interval to a non-zero value\nvia the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs->lock is\nuninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by\naccessing an uninitialized rs->lock. Therefore register sysfs after all\ninitializations are complete to avoid such problems."}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "shortName": "Linux", "dateUpdated": "2024-11-05T09:34:45.822Z"}}}, "cveMetadata": {"cveId": "CVE-2024-40998", "state": "PUBLISHED", "dateUpdated": "2024-11-05T09:34:45.822Z", "dateReserved": "2024-07-12T12:17:45.607Z", "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "datePublished": "2024-07-12T12:37:39.823Z", "assignerShortName": "Linux"}, "dataVersion": "5.1"}

{"cveTags": [], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()\n\nIn the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs->lock:\n\next4_fill_super\n ext4_register_sysfs\n // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms\n // Other processes modify rs->interval to\n // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms\n ext4_orphan_cleanup\n ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, \"Errors on filesystem, \"\n __ext4_msg\n ___ratelimit(&(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state)\n if (!rs->interval) // do nothing if interval is 0\n return 1;\n raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags)\n raw_spin_trylock(lock)\n _raw_spin_trylock\n __raw_spin_trylock\n spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_)\n lock_acquire\n __lock_acquire\n register_lock_class\n assign_lock_key\n dump_stack();\n ratelimit_state_init(&sbi->s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10);\n raw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock);\n // init rs->lock here\n\nand get the following dump_stack:\n\n=========================================================\nINFO: trying to register non-static key.\nThe code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe\nyou didn't initialize this object before use?\nturning off the locking correctness validator.\nCPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170\n dump_stack+0x18/0x30\n register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0\n __lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0\n lock_acquire+0x120/0x450\n _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0\n ___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220\n __ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4]\n ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4]\n __ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4]\n ext4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4]\n[...]\n=========================================================\n\nNormally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so\n___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing\nrs->lock, so it is possible to change rs->interval to a non-zero value\nvia the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs->lock is\nuninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by\naccessing an uninitialized rs->lock. Therefore register sysfs after all\ninitializations are complete to avoid such problems."}, {"lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ext4: arreglar ratelimit_state no inicializado->bloquear acceso en __ext4_fill_super() En la siguiente concurrencia accederemos al rs->lock no inicializado: ext4_fill_super ext4_register_sysfs // sysfs registrado msg_ratelimit_interval_ms // Otros procesos modificar rs->interval a // distinto de cero a trav\u00e9s de msg_ratelimit_interval_ms ext4_orphan_cleanup ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, \"Errores en el sistema de archivos, \" __ext4_msg ___ratelimit(&(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state) if (!rs->interval) // hacer nada si el intervalo es 0 devuelve 1; ->s_msg_ratelimit_state , 5 * HZ, 10); raw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock); // inicia rs->lock aqu\u00ed y obtiene el siguiente dump_stack: ==================== ===================================== INFORMACI\u00d3N: intentando registrar una clave no est\u00e1tica. El c\u00f3digo est\u00e1 bien pero necesita una anotaci\u00f3n de bloqueo, \u00bfo tal vez no inicializ\u00f3 este objeto antes de usarlo? apagando el validador de correcci\u00f3n de bloqueo. CPU: 12 PID: 753 Comunicaciones: montaje contaminado: GE 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504 [...] Seguimiento de llamadas: dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170 dump_stack+0x18/0x30 Register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0 __lock_acquire+0x69/ 0x13a0 lock_acquire+0x120/0x450 _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0 ___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220 __ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4] ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4] 0x2b10 [ext4] text4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4] [. ..] ================================================= ========== Normalmente el intervalo es 0 hasta que se inicializa s_msg_ratelimit_state, por lo que ___ratelimit() no hace nada. Pero el registro de sysfs precede a la inicializaci\u00f3n de rs->lock, por lo que es posible cambiar rs->interval a un valor distinto de cero a trav\u00e9s de la interfaz msg_ratelimit_interval_ms de sysfs mientras rs->lock no est\u00e1 inicializado, y luego una llamada a ext4_msg desencadena el problema al accediendo a un rs->lock no inicializado. Por lo tanto, registre sysfs despu\u00e9s de que se completen todas las inicializaciones para evitar este tipo de problemas."}], "id": "CVE-2024-40998", "lastModified": "2024-07-12T16:34:58.687", "metrics": {}, "published": "2024-07-12T13:15:20.857", "references": [{"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23afcd52af06880c6c913a0ad99022b8937b575c"}, {"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/645267906944a9aeec9d5c56ee24a9096a288798"}, {"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4b4fda34e535756f9e774fb2d09c4537b7dfd1c"}], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"}

{"affected_release": [{"advisory": "RHSA-2024:7001", "cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux:8::nfv", "package": "kernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.22.1.rt7.363.el8_10", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8", "release_date": "2024-09-24T00:00:00Z"}, {"advisory": "RHSA-2024:7000", "cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8", "package": "kernel-0:4.18.0-553.22.1.el8_10", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8", "release_date": "2024-09-24T00:00:00Z"}, {"advisory": "RHSA-2024:8616", "cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:rhel_aus:8.6", "package": "kernel-0:4.18.0-372.127.1.el8_6", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support", "release_date": "2024-10-30T00:00:00Z"}, {"advisory": "RHSA-2024:8616", "cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:rhel_tus:8.6", "package": "kernel-0:4.18.0-372.127.1.el8_6", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service", "release_date": "2024-10-30T00:00:00Z"}, {"advisory": "RHSA-2024:8616", "cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:rhel_e4s:8.6", "package": "kernel-0:4.18.0-372.127.1.el8_6", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions", "release_date": "2024-10-30T00:00:00Z"}, {"advisory": "RHSA-2024:8107", "cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:rhel_eus:8.8", "package": "kernel-0:4.18.0-477.75.1.el8_8", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support", "release_date": "2024-10-15T00:00:00Z"}, {"advisory": "RHSA-2024:8617", "cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux:9", "package": "kernel-0:5.14.0-427.42.1.el9_4", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9", "release_date": "2024-10-30T00:00:00Z"}, {"advisory": "RHSA-2024:8617", "cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9", "package": "kernel-0:5.14.0-427.42.1.el9_4", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9", "release_date": "2024-10-30T00:00:00Z"}, {"advisory": "RHSA-2024:8613", "cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_eus:9.2", "package": "kernel-0:5.14.0-284.90.1.el9_2", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support", "release_date": "2024-10-30T00:00:00Z"}, {"advisory": "RHSA-2024:8614", "cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_eus:9.2::nfv", "package": "kernel-rt-0:5.14.0-284.90.1.rt14.375.el9_2", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support", "release_date": "2024-10-30T00:00:00Z"}], "bugzilla": {"description": "kernel: ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()", "id": "2297582", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297582"}, "csaw": false, "cvss3": {"cvss3_base_score": "5.5", "cvss3_scoring_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "status": "verified"}, "details": ["In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\next4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()\nIn the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs->lock:\next4_fill_super\next4_register_sysfs\n// sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms\n// Other processes modify rs->interval to\n// non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms\next4_orphan_cleanup\next4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, \"Errors on filesystem, \"\n__ext4_msg\n___ratelimit(&(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state)\nif (!rs->interval) // do nothing if interval is 0\nreturn 1;\nraw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags)\nraw_spin_trylock(lock)\n_raw_spin_trylock\n__raw_spin_trylock\nspin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_)\nlock_acquire\n__lock_acquire\nregister_lock_class\nassign_lock_key\ndump_stack();\nratelimit_state_init(&sbi->s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10);\nraw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock);\n// init rs->lock here\nand get the following dump_stack:\n=========================================================\nINFO: trying to register non-static key.\nThe code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe\nyou didn't initialize this object before use?\nturning off the locking correctness validator.\nCPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504\n[...]\nCall Trace:\ndump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170\ndump_stack+0x18/0x30\nregister_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0\n__lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0\nlock_acquire+0x120/0x450\n_raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0\n___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220\n__ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4]\next4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4]\n__ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4]\next4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4]\n[...]\n=========================================================\nNormally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so\n___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing\nrs->lock, so it is possible to change rs->interval to a non-zero value\nvia the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs->lock is\nuninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by\naccessing an uninitialized rs->lock. Therefore register sysfs after all\ninitializations are complete to avoid such problems."], "mitigation": {"lang": "en:us", "value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."}, "name": "CVE-2024-40998", "package_state": [{"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6", "fix_state": "Out of support scope", "package_name": "kernel", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7", "fix_state": "Out of support scope", "package_name": "kernel", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7", "fix_state": "Out of support scope", "package_name": "kernel-rt", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9", "fix_state": "Affected", "package_name": "kernel-rt", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9"}], "public_date": "2024-07-12T00:00:00Z", "references": ["https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998\nhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40998\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024071252-CVE-2024-40998-90d6@gregkh/T"], "threat_severity": "Moderate", "upstream_fix": "kernel 6.6.36, kernel 6.9.7, kernel 6.10-rc1"}