In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: protect uart_port_dtr_rts() in uart_shutdown() too
Commit af224ca2df29 (serial: core: Prevent unsafe uart port access, part
3) added few uport == NULL checks. It added one to uart_shutdown(), so
the commit assumes, uport can be NULL in there. But right after that
protection, there is an unprotected "uart_port_dtr_rts(uport, false);"
call. That is invoked only if HUPCL is set, so I assume that is the
reason why we do not see lots of these reports.
Or it cannot be NULL at this point at all for some reason :P.
Until the above is investigated, stay on the safe side and move this
dereference to the if too.
I got this inconsistency from Coverity under CID 1585130. Thanks.
Metrics
Affected Vendors & Products
References
History
Fri, 08 Nov 2024 16:15:00 +0000
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
References |
|
Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:30:00 +0000
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
References |
|
Thu, 24 Oct 2024 04:15:00 +0000
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
First Time appeared |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
Weaknesses | CWE-476 | |
CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | |
Vendors & Products |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:15:00 +0000
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
Metrics |
ssvc
|
Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:30:00 +0000
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
References |
| |
Metrics |
threat_severity
|
cvssV3_1
|
Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:45:00 +0000
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: serial: protect uart_port_dtr_rts() in uart_shutdown() too Commit af224ca2df29 (serial: core: Prevent unsafe uart port access, part 3) added few uport == NULL checks. It added one to uart_shutdown(), so the commit assumes, uport can be NULL in there. But right after that protection, there is an unprotected "uart_port_dtr_rts(uport, false);" call. That is invoked only if HUPCL is set, so I assume that is the reason why we do not see lots of these reports. Or it cannot be NULL at this point at all for some reason :P. Until the above is investigated, stay on the safe side and move this dereference to the if too. I got this inconsistency from Coverity under CID 1585130. Thanks. | |
Title | serial: protect uart_port_dtr_rts() in uart_shutdown() too | |
References |
|
MITRE
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: Linux
Published: 2024-10-21T19:39:48.420Z
Updated: 2024-11-19T01:15:22.961Z
Reserved: 2024-10-21T19:36:19.938Z
Link: CVE-2024-50058
Vulnrichment
Updated: 2024-10-22T13:23:17.570Z
NVD
Status : Modified
Published: 2024-10-21T20:15:17.993
Modified: 2024-11-08T16:15:45.117
Link: CVE-2024-50058
Redhat