io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush
In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty.
And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries.
However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case
that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can
take quite a while.
Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and
do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows
always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire
the locks at the end of the loop.
No analysis available yet.
No remediation available yet.
Tracking
Sign in to view the affected projects.
| Source | ID | Title |
|---|---|---|
Debian DLA |
DLA-4008-1 | linux-6.1 security update |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7276-1 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7277-1 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7310-1 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7383-1 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7383-2 | Linux kernel (Real-time) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7384-1 | Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7384-2 | Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7385-1 | Linux kernel (IBM) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7386-1 | Linux kernel (OEM) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7403-1 | Linux kernel (HWE) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7451-1 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7468-1 | Linux kernel (Azure, N-Series) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7523-1 | Linux kernel (Raspberry Pi Real-time) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7524-1 | Linux kernel (Raspberry Pi) vulnerabilities |
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 23:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| References |
|
Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:45:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Weaknesses | CWE-667 |
Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:45:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| First Time appeared |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| Weaknesses | NVD-CWE-noinfo | |
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | |
| Vendors & Products |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:15:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics |
ssvc
|
Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| References |
| |
| Metrics |
threat_severity
|
cvssV3_1
|
Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:45:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty. And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries. However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can take quite a while. Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire the locks at the end of the loop. | |
| Title | io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush | |
| References |
|
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: Linux
Published:
Updated: 2025-11-03T22:25:00.157Z
Reserved: 2024-10-21T19:36:19.939Z
Link: CVE-2024-50060
Updated: 2025-11-03T22:25:00.157Z
Status : Modified
Published: 2024-10-21T20:15:18.117
Modified: 2025-11-03T23:16:45.853
Link: CVE-2024-50060
OpenCVE Enrichment
No data.
Debian DLA
Ubuntu USN