In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tomoyo: don't emit warning in tomoyo_write_control()
syzbot is reporting too large allocation warning at tomoyo_write_control(),
for one can write a very very long line without new line character. To fix
this warning, I use __GFP_NOWARN rather than checking for KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE,
for practically a valid line should be always shorter than 32KB where the
"too small to fail" memory-allocation rule applies.
One might try to write a valid line that is longer than 32KB, but such
request will likely fail with -ENOMEM. Therefore, I feel that separately
returning -EINVAL when a line is longer than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE is redundant.
There is no need to distinguish over-32KB and over-KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE.
tomoyo: don't emit warning in tomoyo_write_control()
syzbot is reporting too large allocation warning at tomoyo_write_control(),
for one can write a very very long line without new line character. To fix
this warning, I use __GFP_NOWARN rather than checking for KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE,
for practically a valid line should be always shorter than 32KB where the
"too small to fail" memory-allocation rule applies.
One might try to write a valid line that is longer than 32KB, but such
request will likely fail with -ENOMEM. Therefore, I feel that separately
returning -EINVAL when a line is longer than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE is redundant.
There is no need to distinguish over-32KB and over-KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE.
Metrics
Affected Vendors & Products
Advisories
| Source | ID | Title |
|---|---|---|
Debian DLA |
DLA-4102-1 | linux-6.1 security update |
Debian DLA |
DLA-4178-1 | linux security update |
EUVD |
EUVD-2024-54014 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tomoyo: don't emit warning in tomoyo_write_control() syzbot is reporting too large allocation warning at tomoyo_write_control(), for one can write a very very long line without new line character. To fix this warning, I use __GFP_NOWARN rather than checking for KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE, for practically a valid line should be always shorter than 32KB where the "too small to fail" memory-allocation rule applies. One might try to write a valid line that is longer than 32KB, but such request will likely fail with -ENOMEM. Therefore, I feel that separately returning -EINVAL when a line is longer than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE is redundant. There is no need to distinguish over-32KB and over-KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7510-1 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7510-2 | Linux kernel (FIPS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7510-3 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7510-4 | Linux kernel (Real-time) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7510-5 | Linux kernel (Azure FIPS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7510-6 | Linux kernel (AWS FIPS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7510-7 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7510-8 | Linux kernel (AWS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7511-1 | Linux kernel (GCP) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7511-2 | Linux kernel (GCP FIPS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7511-3 | Linux kernel (GKE) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7512-1 | Linux kernel (GCP) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7516-1 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7516-2 | Linux kernel (GCP FIPS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7516-3 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7516-4 | Linux kernel (Oracle) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7516-5 | Linux kernel (HWE) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7516-6 | Linux kernel (IBM) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7516-7 | Linux kernel (AWS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7516-8 | Linux kernel (FIPS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7516-9 | Linux kernel (AWS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7517-1 | Linux kernel (Xilinx ZynqMP) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7517-2 | Linux kernel (IBM) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7517-3 | Linux kernel (BlueField) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7518-1 | Linux kernel (Azure FIPS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7521-1 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7521-2 | Linux kernel (AWS) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7521-3 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7539-1 | Linux kernel (Raspberry Pi) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7540-1 | Linux kernel (Raspberry Pi) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7593-1 | Linux kernel (HWE) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7602-1 | Linux kernel (Xilinx ZynqMP) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7640-1 | Linux kernel (IoT) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7651-1 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7651-2 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7651-3 | Linux kernel vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7651-4 | Linux kernel (GCP) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7651-5 | Linux kernel (Raspberry Pi Real-time) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7651-6 | Linux kernel (Raspberry Pi) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7652-1 | Linux kernel (Real-time) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7653-1 | Linux kernel (HWE) vulnerabilities |
Ubuntu USN |
USN-7737-1 | Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities |
Fixes
Solution
No solution given by the vendor.
Workaround
No workaround given by the vendor.
References
History
Fri, 31 Oct 2025 16:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Weaknesses | NVD-CWE-noinfo | |
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| References |
|
Fri, 07 Mar 2025 14:00:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| References |
| |
| Metrics |
threat_severity
|
cvssV3_1
|
Thu, 06 Mar 2025 16:45:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tomoyo: don't emit warning in tomoyo_write_control() syzbot is reporting too large allocation warning at tomoyo_write_control(), for one can write a very very long line without new line character. To fix this warning, I use __GFP_NOWARN rather than checking for KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE, for practically a valid line should be always shorter than 32KB where the "too small to fail" memory-allocation rule applies. One might try to write a valid line that is longer than 32KB, but such request will likely fail with -ENOMEM. Therefore, I feel that separately returning -EINVAL when a line is longer than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE is redundant. There is no need to distinguish over-32KB and over-KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. | |
| Title | tomoyo: don't emit warning in tomoyo_write_control() | |
| References |
|
|
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: Linux
Published:
Updated: 2025-05-04T10:09:44.077Z
Reserved: 2025-03-06T15:52:09.184Z
Link: CVE-2024-58085
No data.
Status : Analyzed
Published: 2025-03-06T17:15:21.993
Modified: 2025-10-31T16:25:37.390
Link: CVE-2024-58085
OpenCVE Enrichment
Updated: 2025-07-12T23:05:46Z
Debian DLA
EUVD
Ubuntu USN