Description
temporal-proxy 0.2.0 through 0.8.0 does not bind encrypted payloads to the namespace they were encrypted for. When payload encryption is enabled, the proxy chooses the decryption key by an identifier stored in the payload rather than by the namespace of the request, and nothing in the ciphertext records that namespace. A caller whom the proxy authorizes only for namespace B, and who has obtained an encrypted payload from namespace A, can therefore have the proxy decrypt it. In 0.8.0, the caller can submit the payload to the codec server's /decode endpoint. In every affected version, a caller who can also write to namespace B on the Temporal server directly can place the payload there and read it back through the proxy. This holds whether namespaces share the default key or each has its own, because a single proxy holds every key it is configured with. The issue does not give the attacker encrypted payloads they could not already obtain, and does not allow encrypted payloads to be modified.
Published: 2026-10-15
Score: 6 Medium
EPSS: < 1% Very Low
KEV: No
Impact: Unauthorized Cross‑Namespace Decryption
Action: Patch
AI Analysis

Impact

temporal‑proxy versions 0.2.0 through 0.8.0 allow a user authorized for one namespace to decrypt payloads that were encrypted for another namespace. The proxy selects the decryption key solely from an identifier embedded in the ciphertext, ignoring the namespace of the request. As a result, an attacker who can obtain an encrypted payload from namespace A and who has write or request access to namespace B can use the proxy to decrypt the data and read the contents. The vulnerability does not let an attacker modify ciphertext or generate new encrypted data that they could not already retrieve; it only permits reading data that the attacker could already access if they had write privileges in the target namespace.

Affected Systems

The affected product is Temporal Technologies, Inc.’s temporal‑proxy component, versions 0.2.0 up to but not including 0.9.0. The issue is present in every release from 0.2.0 through 0.8.0. The vulnerability applies whenever payload encryption is enabled, regardless of whether namespaces share a default key or each has its own key, because a single instance holds every key it is configured to use. Users running these versions on a Temporal cluster that employs multiple namespaces, or that expose the codec server’s /decode endpoint, are at risk.

Risk and Exploitability

The CVSS score of 6 indicates a moderate severity, and the EPSS score of < 1% suggests a low likelihood of exploitation at this time. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA’s KEV catalog. The likely attack vector is remote API interaction with the temporal‑proxy service; an attacker must be authenticated to the proxy with permission to access a target namespace and must have a means of obtaining an encrypted payload from another namespace, such as via disclosure or an existing read operation. Once the proxy is configured with permissive mode or the codec server is enabled, the attacker can submit the payload to the /decode endpoint to obtain its plaintext. Mitigation requires upgrading to a fixed release or reconfiguring the environment.

Generated by OpenCVE AI on October 16, 2026 at 16:42 UTC.

Remediation

Vendor Solution

Upgrade to temporal-proxy 0.9.0 or later and set encryption.namespaceBinding to strict. Fixed releases record the namespace in each payload they encrypt and, in strict mode, refuse to decrypt a payload recorded for another namespace or for none, including through the codec server's /decode endpoint, which then requires the caller to name a namespace. The setting has no default and must be set whenever encryption keys are configured. The off and permissive modes exist to migrate payloads encrypted by earlier releases, which carry no namespace, and do not close this issue; move to strict once the vault_unbound_opens_total and vault_namespace_mismatches_total metrics have stayed at zero for longer than namespace retention. Payloads carried in Nexus operations are not compared, because they cross namespaces by design.


Vendor Workaround

Until a fixed release is deployed, serve namespaces that must stay isolated from each other through separate proxy deployments, or use KMS key policies that let each proxy use only the keys of the namespaces it serves. Giving each namespace its own key on a single proxy does not help, because that proxy holds all of them. Leaving the codec server disabled closes the /decode route only.


OpenCVE Recommended Actions

  • Upgrade temporal‑proxy to version 0.9.0 or newer.
  • Set the encryption.namespaceBinding configuration to strict for all namespaces.
  • Disable the codec server or delete the /decode route to prevent remote decryption.
  • If an upgrade is not immediately possible, deploy separate proxy instances per namespace or enforce KMS key policies that restrict each proxy to the keys of the namespaces it serves.

Generated by OpenCVE AI on October 16, 2026 at 16:42 UTC.

Tracking

Sign in to view the affected projects.

Advisories

No advisories yet.

History

Tue, 27 Oct 2026 04:30:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
First Time appeared Temporal
Temporal temporal-proxy
Vendors & Products Temporal
Temporal temporal-proxy

Fri, 16 Oct 2026 16:30:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Metrics ssvc

{'options': {'Automatable': 'no', 'Exploitation': 'none', 'Technical Impact': 'partial'}, 'version': '2.0.3'}


Thu, 15 Oct 2026 19:15:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Description temporal-proxy 0.2.0 through 0.8.0 does not bind encrypted payloads to the namespace they were encrypted for. When payload encryption is enabled, the proxy chooses the decryption key by an identifier stored in the payload rather than by the namespace of the request, and nothing in the ciphertext records that namespace. A caller whom the proxy authorizes only for namespace B, and who has obtained an encrypted payload from namespace A, can therefore have the proxy decrypt it. In 0.8.0, the caller can submit the payload to the codec server's /decode endpoint. In every affected version, a caller who can also write to namespace B on the Temporal server directly can place the payload there and read it back through the proxy. This holds whether namespaces share the default key or each has its own, because a single proxy holds every key it is configured with. The issue does not give the attacker encrypted payloads they could not already obtain, and does not allow encrypted payloads to be modified.
Title temporal-proxy payload decryption is not bound to the request namespace
Weaknesses CWE-639
References
Metrics cvssV4_0

{'score': 6, 'vector': 'CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N'}


Subscriptions

Temporal Temporal-proxy
cve-icon MITRE

Status: PUBLISHED

Assigner: Temporal

Published:

Updated: 2026-10-16T15:20:20.801Z

Reserved: 2026-10-09T14:47:54.417Z

Link: CVE-2026-108126

cve-icon Vulnrichment

Updated: 2026-10-16T15:11:45.651Z

cve-icon NVD

Status : Awaiting Analysis

Published: 2026-10-15T19:17:19.873

Modified: 2026-10-16T19:55:59.740

Link: CVE-2026-108126

cve-icon Redhat

No data.

cve-icon OpenCVE Enrichment

Updated: 2026-10-26T22:36:38Z

Weaknesses
  • CWE-639

    Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key