Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Total
20985 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-5616 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Software Collections | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-6663. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-6663. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-6663 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2016-5483 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Software Collections | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-3600. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-3600. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-3600 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2016-5320 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-5314. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-5314. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-5314 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000023 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Rhel Software Collections | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10540. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10540. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10540 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000022 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10539. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-10539. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10539 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2015-5196 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7703. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-7703. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-7703 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3208 | 1 Redhat | 1 Satellite | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2014-9298 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9750, CVE-2014-9751. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was associated with two issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2014-9750 and CVE-2014-9751 to identify the ID or IDs of interest. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2014-9297 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9750, CVE-2014-9751. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was associated with two issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2014-9750 and CVE-2014-9751 to identify the ID or IDs of interest. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2013-1752 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Software Collections | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| Various versions of Python do not properly restrict readline calls, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a long string, related to (1) httplib - fixed in 2.7.4, 2.6.9, and 3.3.3; (2) ftplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (3) imaplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (4) nntplib - fixed in 2.7.6, 2.6.9, 3.3.3; (5) poplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, 3.3.3; and (6) smtplib - not yet fixed in 2.7.x, fixed in 2.6.9, not yet fixed in 3.3.x. NOTE: this was REJECTed because it is incompatible with CNT1 "Independently Fixable" in the CVE Counting Decisions | ||||
| CVE-2013-0743 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA at the suggestion of the CVE project team. The candidate had been associated with a correct report of a security problem, but not a problem that is categorized as a vulnerability within CVE. Compromised or unauthorized SSL certificates are not within CVE's scope. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2012-6686 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-4357. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-4357. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-4357 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2012-4166 | 1 Redhat | 1 Rhel Extras | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-4165. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-4165. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-4165 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2009-1563 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0689. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-0689. Certain codebase relationships were not originally clear. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-0689 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3005 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2789. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2789. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2789 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3004 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2788. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2788. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2788 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2023-38037 | 1 Redhat | 3 Logging, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2023-08-23 | 3.3 Low |
| An insecure temporary file vulnerability was found in activesupport rubygem. Contents that will be encrypted are written to a temporary file that has the user’s current umask settings, possibly leading to information disclosure by other users on the same system. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28362 | 1 Redhat | 1 Satellite | 2023-06-27 | 4.7 Medium |
| A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was found in Actionpack due to improper sanitization of user-supplied values. This allows provided values to contain characters that are not legal in an HTTP header value. This results in the potential for downstream services which enforce RFC compliance on HTTP response headers to remove the assigned location header. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27539 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Logging, Rhel Eus and 2 more | 2023-03-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A denial of service vulnerability was found in rubygem-rack in how it parses headers. A carefully crafted input can cause header parsing to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28120 | 1 Redhat | 1 Logging | 2023-03-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| A Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerability was found in rubygem ActiveSupport. If the new bytesplice method is called on a SafeBuffer with untrusted user input, malicious code could be executed. | ||||