Search

Search Results (309356 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-39740 2025-09-11 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/xe/migrate: prevent potential UAF If we hit the error path, the previous fence (if there is one) has already been put() prior to this, so doing a fence_wait could lead to UAF. Tweak the flow to do to the put() until after we do the wait. (cherry picked from commit 9b7ca35ed28fe5fad86e9d9c24ebd1271e4c9c3e)
CVE-2025-39739 2025-09-11 7.0 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SM6115 MDSS compatible Add the SM6115 MDSS compatible to clients compatible list, as it also needs that workaround. Without this workaround, for example, QRB4210 RB2 which is based on SM4250/SM6115 generates a lot of smmu unhandled context faults during boot: arm_smmu_context_fault: 116854 callbacks suppressed arm-smmu c600000.iommu: Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x402, iova=0x5c0ec600, fsynr=0x320021, cbfrsynra=0x420, cb=5 arm-smmu c600000.iommu: FSR = 00000402 [Format=2 TF], SID=0x420 arm-smmu c600000.iommu: FSYNR0 = 00320021 [S1CBNDX=50 PNU PLVL=1] arm-smmu c600000.iommu: Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x402, iova=0x5c0d7800, fsynr=0x320021, cbfrsynra=0x420, cb=5 arm-smmu c600000.iommu: FSR = 00000402 [Format=2 TF], SID=0x420 and also failed initialisation of lontium lt9611uxc, gpu and dpu is observed: (binding MDSS components triggered by lt9611uxc have failed) ------------[ cut here ]------------ !aspace WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 324 at drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c:130 msm_gem_vma_init+0x150/0x18c [msm] Modules linked in: ... (long list of modules) CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 324 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.15.0-03037-gaacc73ceeb8b #4 PREEMPT Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. QRB4210 RB2 (DT) pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : msm_gem_vma_init+0x150/0x18c [msm] lr : msm_gem_vma_init+0x150/0x18c [msm] sp : ffff80008144b280 ... Call trace: msm_gem_vma_init+0x150/0x18c [msm] (P) get_vma_locked+0xc0/0x194 [msm] msm_gem_get_and_pin_iova_range+0x4c/0xdc [msm] msm_gem_kernel_new+0x48/0x160 [msm] msm_gpu_init+0x34c/0x53c [msm] adreno_gpu_init+0x1b0/0x2d8 [msm] a6xx_gpu_init+0x1e8/0x9e0 [msm] adreno_bind+0x2b8/0x348 [msm] component_bind_all+0x100/0x230 msm_drm_bind+0x13c/0x3d0 [msm] try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x164/0x1d0 __component_add+0xa4/0x174 component_add+0x14/0x20 dsi_dev_attach+0x20/0x34 [msm] dsi_host_attach+0x58/0x98 [msm] devm_mipi_dsi_attach+0x34/0x90 lt9611uxc_attach_dsi.isra.0+0x94/0x124 [lontium_lt9611uxc] lt9611uxc_probe+0x540/0x5fc [lontium_lt9611uxc] i2c_device_probe+0x148/0x2a8 really_probe+0xbc/0x2c0 __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x154 __driver_attach+0x90/0x1a0 bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb8 driver_attach+0x24/0x30 bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x208 driver_register+0x68/0x124 i2c_register_driver+0x48/0xcc lt9611uxc_driver_init+0x20/0x1000 [lontium_lt9611uxc] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x1d4 do_init_module+0x54/0x1fc load_module+0x1748/0x1c8c init_module_from_file+0x74/0xa0 __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x130/0x2f8 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x104 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc0/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x2c/0x80 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x10c/0x138 el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- msm_dpu 5e01000.display-controller: [drm:msm_gpu_init [msm]] *ERROR* could not allocate memptrs: -22 msm_dpu 5e01000.display-controller: failed to load adreno gpu platform a400000.remoteproc:glink-edge:apr:service@7:dais: Adding to iommu group 19 msm_dpu 5e01000.display-controller: failed to bind 5900000.gpu (ops a3xx_ops [msm]): -22 msm_dpu 5e01000.display-controller: adev bind failed: -22 lt9611uxc 0-002b: failed to attach dsi to host lt9611uxc 0-002b: probe with driver lt9611uxc failed with error -22
CVE-2025-39738 2025-09-11 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do not allow relocation of partially dropped subvolumes [BUG] There is an internal report that balance triggered transaction abort, with the following call trace: item 85 key (594509824 169 0) itemoff 12599 itemsize 33 extent refs 1 gen 197740 flags 2 ref#0: tree block backref root 7 item 86 key (594558976 169 0) itemoff 12566 itemsize 33 extent refs 1 gen 197522 flags 2 ref#0: tree block backref root 7 ... BTRFS error (device loop0): extent item not found for insert, bytenr 594526208 num_bytes 16384 parent 449921024 root_objectid 934 owner 1 offset 0 BTRFS error (device loop0): failed to run delayed ref for logical 594526208 num_bytes 16384 type 182 action 1 ref_mod 1: -117 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -117) WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6963 at ../fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2168 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xfa/0x110 [btrfs] And btrfs check doesn't report anything wrong related to the extent tree. [CAUSE] The cause is a little complex, firstly the extent tree indeed doesn't have the backref for 594526208. The extent tree only have the following two backrefs around that bytenr on-disk: item 65 key (594509824 METADATA_ITEM 0) itemoff 13880 itemsize 33 refs 1 gen 197740 flags TREE_BLOCK tree block skinny level 0 (176 0x7) tree block backref root CSUM_TREE item 66 key (594558976 METADATA_ITEM 0) itemoff 13847 itemsize 33 refs 1 gen 197522 flags TREE_BLOCK tree block skinny level 0 (176 0x7) tree block backref root CSUM_TREE But the such missing backref item is not an corruption on disk, as the offending delayed ref belongs to subvolume 934, and that subvolume is being dropped: item 0 key (934 ROOT_ITEM 198229) itemoff 15844 itemsize 439 generation 198229 root_dirid 256 bytenr 10741039104 byte_limit 0 bytes_used 345571328 last_snapshot 198229 flags 0x1000000000001(RDONLY) refs 0 drop_progress key (206324 EXTENT_DATA 2711650304) drop_level 2 level 2 generation_v2 198229 And that offending tree block 594526208 is inside the dropped range of that subvolume. That explains why there is no backref item for that bytenr and why btrfs check is not reporting anything wrong. But this also shows another problem, as btrfs will do all the orphan subvolume cleanup at a read-write mount. So half-dropped subvolume should not exist after an RW mount, and balance itself is also exclusive to subvolume cleanup, meaning we shouldn't hit a subvolume half-dropped during relocation. The root cause is, there is no orphan item for this subvolume. In fact there are 5 subvolumes from around 2021 that have the same problem. It looks like the original report has some older kernels running, and caused those zombie subvolumes. Thankfully upstream commit 8d488a8c7ba2 ("btrfs: fix subvolume/snapshot deletion not triggered on mount") has long fixed the bug. [ENHANCEMENT] For repairing such old fs, btrfs-progs will be enhanced. Considering how delayed the problem will show up (at run delayed ref time) and at that time we have to abort transaction already, it is too late. Instead here we reject any half-dropped subvolume for reloc tree at the earliest time, preventing confusion and extra time wasted on debugging similar bugs.
CVE-2025-39737 2025-09-11 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup in __kmemleak_do_cleanup() A soft lockup warning was observed on a relative small system x86-64 system with 16 GB of memory when running a debug kernel with kmemleak enabled. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#8 stuck for 33s! [kworker/8:1:134] The test system was running a workload with hot unplug happening in parallel. Then kemleak decided to disable itself due to its inability to allocate more kmemleak objects. The debug kernel has its CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_MEM_POOL_SIZE set to 40,000. The soft lockup happened in kmemleak_do_cleanup() when the existing kmemleak objects were being removed and deleted one-by-one in a loop via a workqueue. In this particular case, there are at least 40,000 objects that need to be processed and given the slowness of a debug kernel and the fact that a raw_spinlock has to be acquired and released in __delete_object(), it could take a while to properly handle all these objects. As kmemleak has been disabled in this case, the object removal and deletion process can be further optimized as locking isn't really needed. However, it is probably not worth the effort to optimize for such an edge case that should rarely happen. So the simple solution is to call cond_resched() at periodic interval in the iteration loop to avoid soft lockup.
CVE-2025-39736 2025-09-11 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/kmemleak: avoid deadlock by moving pr_warn() outside kmemleak_lock When netpoll is enabled, calling pr_warn_once() while holding kmemleak_lock in mem_pool_alloc() can cause a deadlock due to lock inversion with the netconsole subsystem. This occurs because pr_warn_once() may trigger netpoll, which eventually leads to __alloc_skb() and back into kmemleak code, attempting to reacquire kmemleak_lock. This is the path for the deadlock. mem_pool_alloc() -> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&kmemleak_lock, flags); -> pr_warn_once() -> netconsole subsystem -> netpoll -> __alloc_skb -> __create_object -> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&kmemleak_lock, flags); Fix this by setting a flag and issuing the pr_warn_once() after kmemleak_lock is released.
CVE-2025-10254 2025-09-11 3.5 Low
A vulnerability was found in Ascensio System SIA OnlyOffice up to 12.7.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /Products/Projects/Messages.aspx of the component SVG Image Handler. Performing manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was informed early about this issue and replied: "We are already working on this case, and the issues will be resolved in one of the upcoming patches."
CVE-2025-47437 2 Litespeed Technologies, Wordpress 2 Litespeed Cache, Wordpress 2025-09-11 6.4 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in LiteSpeed Technologies LiteSpeed Cache. This issue affects LiteSpeed Cache: from n/a through 7.0.1.
CVE-2025-47695 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-09-11 7.5 High
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in solwin Blog Designer PRO. This issue affects Blog Designer PRO: from n/a through 3.4.7.
CVE-2025-39553 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-09-11 4.3 Medium
Missing Authorization vulnerability in andy_moyle Church Admin. This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through 5.0.9.
CVE-2025-39523 2 Goodbarber, Wordpress 2 Goodbarber, Wordpress 2025-09-11 4.7 Medium
URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in GoodBarber GoodBarber. This issue affects GoodBarber: from n/a through 1.0.26.
CVE-2025-53340 2 Getawesomesupport, Wordpress 2 Awesome Support, Wordpress 2025-09-11 5.3 Medium
Missing Authorization vulnerability in awesomesupport Awesome Support. This issue affects Awesome Support: from n/a through 6.3.4.
CVE-2025-53348 2 Laborator, Wordpress 2 Kalium, Wordpress 2025-09-11 5.3 Medium
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Laborator Kalium. This issue affects Kalium: from n/a through 3.18.3.
CVE-2025-53291 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-09-11 5.4 Medium
Missing Authorization vulnerability in spoddev2021 Spreadconnect. This issue affects Spreadconnect: from n/a through 2.1.5.
CVE-2025-39541 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-09-11 6.5 Medium
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Roland Murg WP Simple Booking Calendar. This issue affects WP Simple Booking Calendar: from n/a through 2.0.13.
CVE-2025-47569 3 Woocommerce, Wordpress, Wpswings 4 Gift Cards, Woocommerce, Wordpress and 1 more 2025-09-11 9.3 Critical
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in WPSwings WooCommerce Ultimate Gift Card - Create, Sell and Manage Gift Cards with Customized Email Templates. This issue affects WooCommerce Ultimate Gift Card - Create, Sell and Manage Gift Cards with Customized Email Templates: from n/a through 2.8.10.
CVE-2025-47570 2 Villatheme, Wordpress 2 Woocommerce Photo Reviews, Wordpress 2025-09-11 7.1 High
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in villatheme WooCommerce Photo Reviews. This issue affects WooCommerce Photo Reviews: from n/a through 1.3.13.
CVE-2025-47571 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-09-11 7.5 High
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in highwarden Super Store Finder. This issue affects Super Store Finder: from n/a through 6.9.7.
CVE-2025-47579 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-09-11 9 Critical
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in ThemeGoods Photography. This issue affects Photography: from n/a through 7.5.2.
CVE-2025-47694 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-09-11 7.1 High
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in solwin Blog Designer PRO. This issue affects Blog Designer PRO: from n/a through 3.4.7.
CVE-2025-48101 2 Webdevstudios, Wordpress 2 Constant Contact For Wordpress, Wordpress 2025-09-11 8.8 High
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in webdevstudios Constant Contact for WordPress allows Object Injection. This issue affects Constant Contact for WordPress: from n/a through 4.1.1.