Search

Search Results (316399 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-2160 2 Pega, Pegasystems 2 Pega Platform, Pega Infinity 2025-10-30 8.1 High
Pega Platform versions 8.4.3 to Infinity 24.2.1 are affected by an XSS issue with Mashup
CVE-2025-32809 1 Wwnorton 1 Inquizitive 2025-10-30 6.4 Medium
W. W. Norton InQuizitive through 2025-04-08 allows students to conduct stored XSS attacks against educators via a bonus description, feedback.choice_fb[], or question_id.
CVE-2025-32808 1 Wwnorton 1 Inquizitive 2025-10-30 7.7 High
W. W. Norton InQuizitive through 2025-04-08 allows students to insert arbitrary records of their quiz performance into the backend, because only client-side access control exists.
CVE-2025-30373 1 Graylog 1 Graylog 2025-10-30 6.5 Medium
Graylog is a free and open log management platform. Starting with 6.1, HTTP Inputs can be configured to check if a specified header is present and has a specified value to authenticate HTTP-based ingestion. Unfortunately, even though in cases of a missing header or a wrong value the correct HTTP response (401) is returned, the message will be ingested nonetheless. To mitigate the vulnerability, disable http-based inputs and allow only authenticated pull-based inputs. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.1.9.
CVE-2025-21825 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-10-30 4.7 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Cancel the running bpf_timer through kworker for PREEMPT_RT During the update procedure, when overwrite element in a pre-allocated htab, the freeing of old_element is protected by the bucket lock. The reason why the bucket lock is necessary is that the old_element has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems after alloc_htab_elem() returns. If freeing the old_element after the bucket lock is unlocked, the stashed element may be reused by concurrent update procedure and the freeing of old_element will run concurrently with the reuse of the old_element. However, the invocation of check_and_free_fields() may acquire a spin-lock which violates the lockdep rule because its caller has already held a raw-spin-lock (bucket lock). The following warning will be reported when such race happens: BUG: scheduling while atomic: test_progs/676/0x00000003 3 locks held by test_progs/676: #0: ffffffff864b0240 (rcu_read_lock_trace){....}-{0:0}, at: bpf_prog_test_run_syscall+0x2c0/0x830 #1: ffff88810e961188 (&htab->lockdep_key){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_map_update_elem+0x306/0x1500 #2: ffff8881f4eac1b8 (&base->softirq_expiry_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: hrtimer_cancel_wait_running+0xe9/0x1b0 Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(O) Preemption disabled at: [<ffffffff817837a3>] htab_map_update_elem+0x293/0x1500 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 676 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G ... 6.12.0+ #11 Tainted: [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x70 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __schedule_bug+0x120/0x170 __schedule+0x300c/0x4800 schedule_rtlock+0x37/0x60 rtlock_slowlock_locked+0x6d9/0x54c0 rt_spin_lock+0x168/0x230 hrtimer_cancel_wait_running+0xe9/0x1b0 hrtimer_cancel+0x24/0x30 bpf_timer_delete_work+0x1d/0x40 bpf_timer_cancel_and_free+0x5e/0x80 bpf_obj_free_fields+0x262/0x4a0 check_and_free_fields+0x1d0/0x280 htab_map_update_elem+0x7fc/0x1500 bpf_prog_9f90bc20768e0cb9_overwrite_cb+0x3f/0x43 bpf_prog_ea601c4649694dbd_overwrite_timer+0x5d/0x7e bpf_prog_test_run_syscall+0x322/0x830 __sys_bpf+0x135d/0x3ca0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xb0 x64_sys_call+0x1b5/0xa10 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 ... </TASK> It seems feasible to break the reuse and refill of per-cpu extra_elems into two independent parts: reuse the per-cpu extra_elems with bucket lock being held and refill the old_element as per-cpu extra_elems after the bucket lock is unlocked. However, it will make the concurrent overwrite procedures on the same CPU return unexpected -E2BIG error when the map is full. Therefore, the patch fixes the lock problem by breaking the cancelling of bpf_timer into two steps for PREEMPT_RT: 1) use hrtimer_try_to_cancel() and check its return value 2) if the timer is running, use hrtimer_cancel() through a kworker to cancel it again Considering that the current implementation of hrtimer_cancel() will try to acquire a being held softirq_expiry_lock when the current timer is running, these steps above are reasonable. However, it also has downside. When the timer is running, the cancelling of the timer is delayed when releasing the last map uref. The delay is also fixable (e.g., break the cancelling of bpf timer into two parts: one part in locked scope, another one in unlocked scope), it can be revised later if necessary. It is a bit hard to decide the right fix tag. One reason is that the problem depends on PREEMPT_RT which is enabled in v6.12. Considering the softirq_expiry_lock lock exists since v5.4 and bpf_timer is introduced in v5.15, the bpf_timer commit is used in the fixes tag and an extra depends-on tag is added to state the dependency on PREEMPT_RT. Depends-on: v6.12+ with PREEMPT_RT enabled
CVE-2024-30109 1 Hcltech 1 Dryice Aex 2025-10-30 3.7 Low
HCL DRYiCE AEX is impacted by a lack of clickjacking protection in the AEX web application. An attacker can use multiple transparent or opaque layers to trick a user into clicking on a button or link on another page than the one intended.
CVE-2024-30110 1 Hcltech 1 Dryice Aex 2025-10-30 3.7 Low
HCL DRYiCE AEX product is impacted by lack of input validation vulnerability in a particular web application. A malicious script can be injected into a system which can cause the system to behave in unexpected ways.
CVE-2025-53783 1 Microsoft 6 Dynamics 365 Guides, Dynamics 365 Remote Assist, Teams and 3 more 2025-10-30 7.5 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Teams allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2025-49736 2 Google, Microsoft 2 Android, Edge 2025-10-30 4.3 Medium
The ui performs the wrong action in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
CVE-2025-49712 1 Microsoft 3 Sharepoint Enterprise Server 2016, Sharepoint Server, Sharepoint Server 2010 2025-10-30 8.8 High
Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2025-49707 1 Microsoft 24 Azure, Azure Virtual Machine, Dcadsv5-series Azure Vm and 21 more 2025-10-30 7.9 High
Improper access control in Azure Virtual Machines allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing locally.
CVE-2025-55231 1 Microsoft 9 Server, Windows, Windows Server and 6 more 2025-10-30 7.5 High
Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Storage allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2025-55229 1 Microsoft 17 Windows, Windows 10, Windows 10 1507 and 14 more 2025-10-30 5.3 Medium
Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Windows Certificates allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
CVE-2025-49755 2 Google, Microsoft 2 Android, Edge 2025-10-30 4.3 Medium
User interface (ui) misrepresentation of critical information in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
CVE-2025-53787 1 Microsoft 3 365, 365 Copilot, 365 Copilot Chat 2025-10-30 8.2 High
Microsoft 365 Copilot BizChat Information Disclosure Vulnerability
CVE-2025-53774 1 Microsoft 3 365, 365 Copilot, 365 Copilot Chat 2025-10-30 6.5 Medium
Microsoft 365 Copilot BizChat Information Disclosure Vulnerability
CVE-2025-53767 1 Microsoft 2 Azure, Azure Openai 2025-10-30 10 Critical
Azure OpenAI Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2025-53792 1 Microsoft 2 Azure, Azure Portal 2025-10-30 9.1 Critical
Azure Portal Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2025-48807 1 Microsoft 17 Hyper-v, Server, Windows and 14 more 2025-10-30 6.7 Medium
Improper restriction of communication channel to intended endpoints in Windows Hyper-V allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.
CVE-2025-53793 1 Microsoft 1 Azure Stack Hub 2025-10-30 7.5 High
Improper authentication in Azure Stack allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.